Literature DB >> 26884095

A two-step patterning process increases the robustness of periodic patterning in the fly eye.

Avishai Gavish1,2, Naama Barkai3.   

Abstract

Complex periodic patterns can self-organize through dynamic interactions between diffusible activators and inhibitors. In the biological context, self-organized patterning is challenged by spatial heterogeneities ('noise') inherent to biological systems. How spatial variability impacts the periodic patterning mechanism and how it can be buffered to ensure precise patterning is not well understood. We examine the effect of spatial heterogeneity on the periodic patterning of the fruit fly eye, an organ composed of ∼800 miniature eye units (ommatidia) whose periodic arrangement along a hexagonal lattice self-organizes during early stages of fly development. The patterning follows a two-step process, with an initial formation of evenly spaced clusters of ∼10 cells followed by a subsequent refinement of each cluster into a single selected cell. Using a probabilistic approach, we calculate the rate of patterning errors resulting from spatial heterogeneities in cell size, position and biosynthetic capacity. Notably, error rates were largely independent of the desired cluster size but followed the distributions of signaling speeds. Pre-formation of large clusters therefore greatly increases the reproducibility of the overall periodic arrangement, suggesting that the two-stage patterning process functions to guard the pattern against errors caused by spatial heterogeneities. Our results emphasize the constraints imposed on self-organized patterning mechanisms by the need to buffer stochastic effects. Author summary Complex periodic patterns are common in nature and are observed in physical, chemical and biological systems. Understanding how these patterns are generated in a precise manner is a key challenge. Biological patterns are especially intriguing, as they are generated in a noisy environment; cell position and cell size, for example, are subject to stochastic variations, as are the strengths of the chemical signals mediating cell-to-cell communication. The need to generate a precise and robust pattern in this 'noisy' environment restricts the space of patterning mechanisms that can function in the biological setting. Mathematical modeling is useful in comparing the sensitivity of different mechanisms to such variations, thereby highlighting key aspects of their design.We use mathematical modeling to study the periodic patterning of the fruit fly eye. In this system, a highly ordered lattice of differentiated cells is generated in a two-dimensional cell epithelium. The pattern is first observed by the appearance of evenly spaced clusters of ∼10 cells that express specific genes. Each cluster is subsequently refined into a single cell, which initiates the formation and differentiation of a miniature eye unit, the ommatidium. We formulate a mathematical model based on the known molecular properties of the patterning mechanism, and use a probabilistic approach to calculate the errors in cluster formation and refinement resulting from stochastic cell-to-cell variations ('noise') in different quantitative parameters. This enables us to define the parameters most influencing noise sensitivity. Notably, we find that this error is roughly independent of the desired cluster size, suggesting that large clusters are beneficial for ensuring the overall reproducibility of the periodic cluster arrangement. For the stage of cluster refinement, we find that rapid communication between cells is critical for reducing error. Our work provides new insights into the constraints imposed on mechanisms generating periodic patterning in a realistic, noisy environment, and in particular, discusses the different considerations in achieving optimal design of the patterning network.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila eye; Lateral inhibition; Mathematical modeling; Noise; Robust periodic patterning; Spatial heterogeneity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26884095      PMCID: PMC4942416          DOI: 10.1007/s10867-016-9409-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Phys        ISSN: 0092-0606            Impact factor:   1.365


  26 in total

1.  Specificity of Drosophila cytonemes for distinct signaling pathways.

Authors:  Sougata Roy; Frank Hsiung; Thomas B Kornberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Variability and robustness in biomolecular systems.

Authors:  Naama Barkai; Ben-Zion Shilo
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  A dynamical model of ommatidial crystal formation.

Authors:  David K Lubensky; Matthew W Pennington; Boris I Shraiman; Nicholas E Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Retinal differentiation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jessica E Treisman
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 5.814

5.  A primary role for the epidermal growth factor receptor in ommatidial spacing in the Drosophila eye.

Authors:  A Baonza; T Casci; M Freeman
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-03-20       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Atonal is the proneural gene for Drosophila photoreceptors.

Authors:  A P Jarman; E H Grell; L Ackerman; L Y Jan; Y N Jan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-06-02       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Switch and template pattern formation in a discrete reaction-diffusion system inspired by the Drosophila eye.

Authors:  M W Pennington; D K Lubensky
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 1.890

8.  Sequence-specific DNA-binding activities of the gap proteins encoded by hunchback and Krüppel in Drosophila.

Authors:  D Stanojević; T Hoey; M Levine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-09-28       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Notch signalling and the initiation of neural development in the Drosophila eye.

Authors:  A Baonza; M Freeman
Journal:  Development       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Periodic patterning of the Drosophila eye is stabilized by the diffusible activator Scabrous.

Authors:  Avishai Gavish; Arkadi Shwartz; Abraham Weizman; Eyal Schejter; Ben-Zion Shilo; Naama Barkai
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  3 in total

1.  Defect patterns on the curved surface of fish retinae suggest a mechanism of cone mosaic formation.

Authors:  Hayden Nunley; Mikiko Nagashima; Kamirah Martin; Alcides Lorenzo Gonzalez; Sachihiro C Suzuki; Declan A Norton; Rachel O L Wong; Pamela A Raymond; David K Lubensky
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 2.  Hexagonal patterning of the Drosophila eye.

Authors:  Ruth I Johnson
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.148

3.  Threshold response to stochasticity in morphogenesis.

Authors:  George Courcoubetis; Sammi Ali; Sergey V Nuzhdin; Paul Marjoram; Stephan Haas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.