Literature DB >> 26883158

Conversion of a Surgically Arthrodesed Knee to a Total Knee Arthroplasty-Is it Worth it? A Meta-Analysis.

Julio J Jauregui1, Carlos A Buitrago1, Sergei A Pushilin1, Benjamin B Browning1, Neil B Mulchandani1, Aditya V Maheshwari1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conversion of a surgically arthrodesed knee to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an option for a select group of patients who are not satisfied with their results. However, there is a paucity of literature on this topic. A systematic review of literature was performed to (1) describe the overall demographic characteristics; (2) evaluate the clinical outcomes; (3) determine the overall rate of complications; and (4) evaluate the overall satisfaction of patients who underwent conversion of an arthrodesed knee to TKA.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was systematically performed to evaluate all studies included in the literature until July 2015. The specific search terms used were "fusion knee" and "arthrodesis knee," which revealed a total of 2206 studies. A review and selection of these abstracts were then performed based on inclusion and/or exclusion criteria; a total of 10 articles were used for final review.
RESULTS: There were a total of 98 surgically arthrodesed knees that subsequently underwent TKA. Patients had a mean age of 55 years and were followed up for a mean of 5 years. Using a random effects model, there was an overall complication rate of 47%, an overall revision rate of 25%, and an overall failure rate of 11%. However, most patients were overall satisfied with the procedure.
CONCLUSION: Fusion takedown is a challenging procedure that should only be performed by experienced surgeons after extensive discussion with the patients. The clinical outcomes are good with overall patient satisfaction, but complication rates are high including risk of repeat fusion or amputation.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroplasty; knee arthrodesis; knee fusion; revision knee arthroplasty; takedown

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26883158     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

1.  Classification-Based Management of Stiff/Ankylosed Knees.

Authors:  Mrinal Sharma; Saurabh Sharma; Akshay Raj Upadhyaya
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 1.033

2.  A comparative study of total knee arthroplasty outcome for stiff knee with or without sequential antirheumatic drug treatment.

Authors:  Ji-Ying Chen; Xiang Li; Cheng-Qi Jia; Xiao-Rui Guan; Zhi-Lai Zhao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Conversion From Knee Arthrodesis Back to Arthroplasty: A Particular Challenge in Combination With Fungal Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Sven Frieler; Emre Yilmaz; Ryan Goodmanson; Yannik Hanusrichter; Thomas A Schildhauer; Hinnerk Baecker
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-12-05

4.  Outcomes of Second-stage Reimplantation After Modular Knee Arthrodesis for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Alexandra Stavrakis; Erik N Mayer; Sai Devana; Madhav Chowdhry; Matthew Dipane; Edward McPherson
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2022-08-11

5.  Knee arthrodesis: procedures and perspectives in the US from 1993 to 2011.

Authors:  Eric M Lucas; Nicholas C Marais; John D DesJardins
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-09-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.