Literature DB >> 26883127

High-Efficiency, Two-Step Scarless-Markerless Genome Genetic Modification in Salmonella enterica.

Shizhong Geng1, Qin Tian1, Shuming An1, Zhiming Pan1, Xiang Chen1, Xinan Jiao2.   

Abstract

We present a two-step method for scarless-markerless genome genetic modification in Salmonella enterica based on the improved suicide plasmid pGMB152. The whole LacZYA gene can provide a lacZ-based blue/white screening strategy for fast selection of double-crossover mutants by allelic exchange. The high efficiency of this genetic engineering strategy permits the study of gene function by gene knockin, site-directed mutagenesis, and gene knockout to construct live attenuated vaccines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26883127      PMCID: PMC4853454          DOI: 10.1007/s00284-016-1002-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Microbiol        ISSN: 0343-8651            Impact factor:   2.188


Introduction

Genome genetic modification, including gene knockout, gene knockin, and site-directed mutagenesis by replacing target genes with in vitro-modified alleles is an essential tool for studying the genetic basis of bacterial phenotypes at the molecular level [4, 17]. Current methods are largely based on the principles of allelic exchange using a conventional suicide plasmid, such as pGMB151 [8, 11]. pGMB151 is a derivative of the suicide plasmid pKNG101 [11] and includes oriR6K, RP4, sacBR, insB, and strAB with the bla gene from plasmid pBR322 cloned at the Xba I site. It is a suicide plasmid because of its requirement for the pir protein, which is supplied by λpir in certain strains of Escherichia coli, such as SM10 [18]. The current suicide plasmid method may not be very efficient because of low recombination rates or illegitimate recombination, so they are often improved [12, 17]. To improve the efficiency of selecting precise gene-deletion mutants and simplifying the process of genome genetic modification, the sacB gene was introduced into a suicide plasmid for a kind of counterselection. The sacB gene in the suicide plasmid encodes levansucrase, which hydrolyzes sucrose and glucose to fructose, resulting in the production of a toxic fructan that kills the recombinants containing the suicide plasmid. Thus, sucrose is often used to screen bacteria that have lost the suicide plasmid after a double-crossover event in a single-crossover recombinant. Loss of the suicide plasmid can be easily verified via loss of vector-encoded antibiotic resistance. However, this kind of sucrose counterselection only offers one possibility, and its susceptibility to sucrose is variable in different kinds of gram-negative bacteria: for example, in Salmonellaenterica, most single-crossover recombinant bacteria show resistance to sucrose, and a few single-crossover recombinant bacteria are sensitive to sucrose [7, 16]. Additionally, antibiotic resistance genes have been used to replace the target gene as selectable markers of successful gene deletion [8, 14, 15, 17]. Although some enzymes may also remove the antibiotic resistance gene, its flanking sequences may not be completely removed. This is an undesirable situation, particularly when precise and scarless–markerless genome genetic modifications are required, such as in genetically engineered attenuated vaccines. A precise and scarless–markerless genome genetic modification, such as gene knockout for attenuated Salmonella vaccines, gene knockin, and site-directed mutagenesis are more difficult without any exogenous nucleotide residuals. The main problem is that double-crossover events following the loss of a suicide plasmid are very difficult to distinguish because of the low frequency of allelic exchange and resistance to sucrose. We believe that a suicide plasmid should have another visual biomarker as a counter selectable tool. Thus, in this study, to improve the efficiency of allelic exchange for genome genetic modification, a novel pGMB152 vector was constructed with the lacZYA operon incorporated into pGMB151 to provide LacZ-based blue–white selection [1]. The LacZ gene, a well-known reporter gene expressing β-galactosidase, can provide blue–white selection to make the existence of molecular cloning visible [2, 6, 13] and could be used as a biomarker for the suicide plasmid. Bacteria colonies with pGMB152 will show as blue and those without pGMB152 will show as white; therefore, bacterial colonies with different colors could be distinguished easily during the different processes of genome genetic modification. The new plasmid was used to knock out the hsdM gene [9] in Salmonellapullorum to construct a candidate-attenuated Salmonella vaccine, to repair pseudogene flhA by knockin and pseudogene flgk by site-directed mutagenesis.

Materials and Methods

Strains, Plasmids, and Media

The strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. Strains were grown routinely in rich liquid or solid Luria Broth media (LB). The media was supplemented with kanamycin (50 μg/mL), ampicillin (100 μg/mL), and streptomycin (25 μg/mL) as required. Solid LB media with 10 % sucrose and without NaCl was used to screen for gene-deletion mutants during the process of allelic exchange.
Table 1

Strains and plasmids used in this study

MaterialNameUseSourceReference
Bacteria S.Pullorum S06004Recipient strainOur laboratory[9]
E.coli. χ7213Donor strainGift from Dr. R. Curtiss III[10]
E.coli.spy372For cloningGift from Dr. R. Curtiss III
E.coli. DH5αFor cloningTakara company
PlasmidspGMB151Suicide plasmidOur laboratory[11]
pGMB152Suicide plasmidThis study
pFUSETo offer LacZYA geneOur laboratory[1]
pMD20-TFor cloningTakara company
Strains and plasmids used in this study

Construction of Suicide Plasmid pGMB152

The lacZYA cassette was excised from pFUSE (Deng et al. [4]) using restriction endonucleases Sam I and Sal I and ligated into pGMB151 digested with the same restriction recognition sites. This novel plasmid was named pGMB152.

Two-Step Scarless–Markerless Knockout of hsdM Gene

The chloramphenicol resistance gene (Cm) from plasmid pKD3, with 54 bp of homologous sequences of the hsdM gene flanking the two ends of Cm, was PCR amplified using primers hsdM-λ-F/R. This fragment was transformed into S. pullorum S06004 to inactivate the hsdM gene, with the help of plasmid pKD46 by the λ-red method, to construct S. Pullorum hsdM::Cm with an antibiotic marker [3]. An in vitro-modified allele was constructed into pGMB152. Two DNA fragments (1083-bp hsdM12 and 1103-bp hsdM34) flanking the hsdM gene were amplified by PCR using the primers shown in Table 2. The in vitro-modified allele of hsdM 12-34 (ΔhsdM) was amplified using splicing by overlapping Extension PCR using primers hsdM12-F and hsdM34-R, because the primer hsdM 34-F was the reverse complement of the primer hsdM 12-R [5]. The amplified fragment was sub-cloned into the Sal I site of pMD20-T. A kanamycin-resistant gene cassette (Km) was inserted at the Xho I in the middle of the fragment, with a Sal I site at each end [3, 8]. Subsequently, the DNA fragment between the two Sal I sites in the plasmid pMD20T-ΔhsdM was introduced into the Sal I cloning site of suicide plasmid pGMB152 to construct recombinant suicide plasmid pGMB152-ΔhsdM.
Table 2

Primers used in this study (enzyme sites are shown in lower case)

Fragments amplifiedPrimersPrimer sequences (5′-3′)Amplicon size (bp)Note
hsdM-λ hsdM-λ CTGCTGACCGAAATGCTCGAACCGTTCCAGGGCAAAATTTATGACCCCTGCTGCtgtgtaggctggagctgcttcg
hsdM-λ TCGGCTTCGCCGCTGGTGTTGGAGCTCATCGAGCCGTTCGCCAGCACAAAACCGcatatgaatatcctccttag
hsdM12 hsdM12-FaagtcgacctcgagATGCGGGTTCGGTTTGTTTG1083 Sal I, Xho I
hsdM12-RTTCCTGATTGAGTTCATCATGGCCTGAAAAGACAATCCCACTCAATG
hsdM34 hsdM34-FCATTGAGTGGGATTGTCTTTTCAGGCCATGATGAACTCAATCAGGAA1103 Sal I
hsdM34-RaagtcgacTGGTCCGAGCCGGATAAATG
ΔhsdM-YZΔhsdM-YZ-FTGACCACCACCAATGCTACC1920 (wt) 301 (Δ)
ΔhsdM-YZ-RGTGGAACTGCTGGATGTGGA
flhA-λ flhA-λ-FCCTTTAATATTGCGCTATCGATCATGGTGCTGCTGGTGGCGATGTTTACCCAGAtgtgtaggctggagctgcttcg
flhA-λ-RCCAGCGCCGGGATCTGGGCGACCAGGCCGTCGCCAATGGTCAGCAGGGTGTAGCcatatgaatatcctccttag
flhA(P125109) flhA-FAAgtcgac ctcgag CGGTAAGTCGCTACAGCCAA2349 Sal I, Xho I
flhA-RAAgtcgac agatct CCTGAGACACGATCCAAC Sal I
flgK-λ flgK-λ-FTATTCTGGCGCAGGCAAACAGTACGTTAGGGGCTGGCGGCTGGATAGGTAATGGtgtgtaggctggagctgcttcg
flgK-λ-RTGCGCCACGCTGGAGCCAATCGCGATATTGACCTGTTTATCCTGATCGCGCAGAcatatgaatatcctccttag
flgK(P125109) flgK-FAAcccggg CTCGAGGCTGAAAAGTATGCGCGAGG2240 Sma I, Xho I
flgK-R cccggg AAGTTATCGCTGTCGCCGGTAT Sma I
Primers used in this study (enzyme sites are shown in lower case)

Blue–White Selection for White Double-Crossover from Blue Single-Crossover Bacteria

Following a previous protocol [8], the plasmid pGMB152-ΔhsdM was electroporated into E. coli χ7213, which is diaminopimelic acid (DAP) dependent and kanamycin resistant. Blue colonies were selected on LB agar with 40 μg/ml X-gal, 1 % DAP, and three antibiotics (kanamycin, ampicillin, and streptomycin). Conjugation was then carried out between a donor of blue E. coli χ7213 (pGMB152-ΔhsdM) and a recipient of S. Pullorum hsdM::Cm. Equal volumes of 24-h LB cultures from the donor and recipient were mixed and spotted immediately onto a nylon filter on an LB plate [8, 9]. After 36 h of conjugation at 37 °C, the filter was washed with 10 mM MgSO4 and the bacteria were plated onto LB plates containing X-gal and the three antibiotics (kanamycin, ampicillin, and streptomycin). The blue colonies presumably resulted from a single-crossover event where the suicide plasmid pGMB152 was integrated into the chromosome at hsdM. A random single colony was purified and sub-cultured 4–5 times in liquid LB with 10 % sucrose and without NaCl [7, 16]. Bacteria were then plated onto LB agar plates and screened for white colonies without chloramphenicol resistance to confirm the presence of plasmid excised double-crossover events. All white colonies were detected again with chloramphenicol selection: the double-crossover deletants should be susceptible to chloramphenicol because Cm gene was replaced by in vitro-modified allele.

Confirmation of Deletants by PCR

The chromosomal duplication was segregated by homologous recombination between the flanking direct repeats, ultimately leaving one copy of the gene on the chromosome: either the wild-type copy or the deletant copy, and the suicide plasmid pGMB152 were lost simultaneously. The white colonies were further identified by PCR using primers ΔhsdM-YZ-F and ΔhsdM-YZ-R to distinguish the deletants from the wild-type bacteria.

Two-Step Knockin of the flhA and Site-Directed Mutagenesis of flgk

Following the process of scarless–markerless knockout of hsdM gene, all primers were in the Table 2. The λ-red method was used to respectively insert the Cm gene into pseudogene flhA in which 23 bp from 601 to 623 was lost, using primers flhA-λ-F/R, and into the flgK gene in which a nucleotide GAA at 373 was changed to TAA to make a termination codon, using primers flgK-λ-F/R in S. pullorum. We then cloned a real gene from S. enteritidis P125109 to replace the pseudogene in S. pullorum to construct an in vitro-modified allele. Using the blue/white screen strategy in addition to counter selection screening (sacB gene), the mutants with a knocked-in flhA gene and mutated flgk gene were screened. The two genes were amplified by PCR and sequenced for further confirmation.

Results and Discussion

After construction of the recombinant suicide plasmid pGMB152-ΔhsdM/Km and conjugation, only S. pullorum hsdM::Cm pGMB152-ΔhsdM/Km grew as single-crossover recombinants on LB plates with the antibiotics (chloramphenicol, streptomycin, ampicillin, kanamycin) and without DAP, all colonies were blue (Fig. 1 left-hand panel).
Fig. 1

Construction of an in vitro-modified allele

Construction of an in vitro-modified allele When blue S. pullorum hsdM::Cm pGMB152-ΔhsdM/Km was sub-cultured in liquid media with sucrose and without NaCl, a few bacteria turned white, indicating that plasmid excision double-crossover had occurred (Fig. 1 right-hand panel). The theoretical probability of finding deletants among the white colonies would be 50 %, because the two gene arms have an identical chance to exchange with the homologous sequence in the target genome. Approximately 10 % of all white colonies were found to be deletants based on incomplete statistics. White deletants were confirmed by PCR with ΔhsdM-YZ primers based on their amplicon size and antibiotic resistances; wild-type colonies were excluded (Fig. 2). The amplicon size should be 301 bp for the white deletants, 1920 bp for white wild-type strain, and both 1920 bp and 301 bp for the blue clones as a control. The amplicon sizes were consistent with the expected results.
Fig. 2

Blue–white selection. Left-hand panel shows blue colonies resulting from a single-crossover event, and the right-hand panel shows the white colonies (possible hsdM deletants) from a double-crossover event (example of hsdM) (Color figure online)

Blue–white selection. Left-hand panel shows blue colonies resulting from a single-crossover event, and the right-hand panel shows the white colonies (possible hsdM deletants) from a double-crossover event (example of hsdM) (Color figure online) Gene knockin and site-directed mutagenesis might be more difficult than gene knockout. We believed that improved plasmid could also be applied successfully for scarless–markerless gene knockin to repair the flhB and flgK pseudogenes in S.pullorum, following the process summarized in Fig. 3. After repair, the two genes, flhA and flgK, were amplified and sequenced for further confirmation. The results showed that the original pseudogenes were replaced by real genes. We successfully generated the knockin of the real flhA gene using 23 bp from 601 to 623 and performed site-directed mutagenesis of flgK to change nucleotide 373 from TAA, which is a termination codon, to GAA in S. pullorum (Fig. 4).
Fig. 3

PCR identification of hsdM deletants from white colonies. M: DNA Marker DL2000; lane1: S06004 as a control; lane2: White colony 1(wild type S06004); lane3: White colony 2 (S06004ΔhsdM); lane4: Blue colony(S06004(pGMB152-ΔhsdM)).

Fig. 4

The process of two-step scarless–markerless genome genetic modification based on suicide plasmid pGMB152

PCR identification of hsdM deletants from white colonies. M: DNA Marker DL2000; lane1: S06004 as a control; lane2: White colony 1(wild type S06004); lane3: White colony 2 (S06004ΔhsdM); lane4: Blue colony(S06004(pGMB152-ΔhsdM)). The process of two-step scarless–markerless genome genetic modification based on suicide plasmid pGMB152 In this study, we found that sucrose-counter selection was relatively inefficient, as indicated by the presence of large numbers of blue colonies among the transformants (Fig. 1 right-hand panel) in S.pullorum, possibly because of host adaptation. This further confirmed that double-crossover events occurred rarely in bacteria following the traditional method [7, 16]. The results indicated that we could select random single-crossover recombinant bacteria without needing to reassess their sucrose sensitivity [8]. The larger size of vector pGMB152 might make molecular manipulations more difficult. To overcome this problem, an antibiotic resistance gene was cloned in one flank of the in vitro-modified allele for easy selection of recombinants, such as the kanamycin resistance gene in this study (Fig. 1). This study is the first report of a suicide plasmid comprising the complete lacZ gene that allows visual selection of double-crossover mutants. Although pGMB152 had only one modification, i.e., the entire lacZYA operon, compared with pGMB151, it was more efficient and less time consuming in producing allelic exchanges of gram-negative bacteria because of its color discrimination. Thus, the improved suicide plasmid, pGMB152, will be helpful for precise and scarless–markerless genome genetic modification.
  17 in total

1.  Improvement of pCVD442, a suicide plasmid for gene allele exchange in bacteria.

Authors:  Nadège Philippe; Jean-Pierre Alcaraz; Evelyne Coursange; Johannes Geiselmann; Dominique Schneider
Journal:  Plasmid       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Conditionally replicative and conjugative plasmids carrying lacZ alpha for cloning, mutagenesis, and allele replacement in bacteria.

Authors:  W W Metcalf; W Jiang; L L Daniels; S K Kim; A Haldimann; B L Wanner
Journal:  Plasmid       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.466

3.  One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products.

Authors:  K A Datsenko; B L Wanner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Recombination in mycobacteria.

Authors:  J McFadden
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.501

5.  Salmonella typhi rpoS mutant is less cytotoxic than the parent strain but survives inside resting THP-1 macrophages.

Authors:  A Q Khan; L Zhao; K Hirose; M Miyake; T Li; Y Hashimoto; Y Kawamura; T Ezaki
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 2.742

6.  Identification and mutagenesis by allelic exchange of choE, encoding a cholesterol oxidase from the intracellular pathogen Rhodococcus equi.

Authors:  J Navas; B González-Zorn; N Ladrón; P Garrido; J A Vázquez-Boland
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Cloning structural gene sacB, which codes for exoenzyme levansucrase of Bacillus subtilis: expression of the gene in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  P Gay; D Le Coq; M Steinmetz; E Ferrari; J A Hoch
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Identification of a new iron regulated locus of Salmonella typhi.

Authors:  A J Bäumler; R M Tsolis; A W van der Velden; I Stojiljkovic; S Anic; F Heffron
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1996-12-12       Impact factor: 3.688

9.  Immune responses to recombinant pneumococcal PspA antigen delivered by live attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium vaccine.

Authors:  Ho Young Kang; Jay Srinivasan; Roy Curtiss
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Dissecting virulence: systematic and functional analyses of a pathogenicity island.

Authors:  Wanyin Deng; José L Puente; Samantha Gruenheid; Yuling Li; Bruce A Vallance; Alejandra Vázquez; Jeannette Barba; J Antonio Ibarra; Paul O'Donnell; Pavel Metalnikov; Keith Ashman; Sansan Lee; David Goode; Tony Pawson; B Brett Finlay
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Phage Therapy: What Have We Learned?

Authors:  Andrzej Górski; Ryszard Międzybrodzki; Małgorzata Łobocka; Aleksandra Głowacka-Rutkowska; Agnieszka Bednarek; Jan Borysowski; Ewa Jończyk-Matysiak; Marzanna Łusiak-Szelachowska; Beata Weber-Dąbrowska; Natalia Bagińska; Sławomir Letkiewicz; Krystyna Dąbrowska; Jacques Scheres
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 2.  Controversy Surrounding the Function of SpiC Protein in Salmonella: An Overview.

Authors:  Yaonan Wang; Yuan Cai; Jian Zhang; Dong Liu; Xiao Gong; Zhiming Pan; Shizhong Geng; Xin'an Jiao
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Small noncoding RNA sRNA0426 is involved in regulating biofilm formation in Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  Luoping Yin; Wenhui Zhu; Dongru Chen; Yan Zhou; Huancai Lin
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  The Loss of focA Gene Increases the Ability of Salmonella Enteritidis to Exit from Macrophages and Boosts Early Extraintestinal Spread for Systemic Infection in a Mouse Model.

Authors:  Ran Gao; Jian Zhang; Haoyu Geng; Yaonan Wang; Xilong Kang; Shizhong Geng; Xin'an Jiao; Paul Barrow
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-08-02

5.  Development of a Method for Simultaneous Generation of Multiple Genetic Modification in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium.

Authors:  Wenxian Jing; Juan Liu; Shanshan Wu; Qiwei Chen; Xuerui Li; Yongsheng Liu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 4.599

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.