Literature DB >> 26883091

Heritability of non-speech auditory processing skills.

Carmen C Brewer1, Christopher K Zalewski1, Kelly A King1, Oliver Zobay2, Alison Riley2, Melanie A Ferguson2,3, Jonathan E Bird4, Margaret M McCabe5, Linda J Hood6, Dennis Drayna7, Andrew J Griffith1, Robert J Morell4,8, Thomas B Friedman4, David R Moore2,9.   

Abstract

Recent insight into the genetic bases for autism spectrum disorder, dyslexia, stuttering, and language disorders suggest that neurogenetic approaches may also reveal at least one etiology of auditory processing disorder (APD). A person with an APD typically has difficulty understanding speech in background noise despite having normal pure-tone hearing sensitivity. The estimated prevalence of APD may be as high as 10% in the pediatric population, yet the causes are unknown and have not been explored by molecular or genetic approaches. The aim of our study was to determine the heritability of frequency and temporal resolution for auditory signals and speech recognition in noise in 96 identical or fraternal twin pairs, aged 6-11 years. Measures of auditory processing (AP) of non-speech sounds included backward masking (temporal resolution), notched noise masking (spectral resolution), pure-tone frequency discrimination (temporal fine structure sensitivity), and nonsense syllable recognition in noise. We provide evidence of significant heritability, ranging from 0.32 to 0.74, for individual measures of these non-speech-based AP skills that are crucial for understanding spoken language. Identification of specific heritable AP traits such as these serve as a basis to pursue the genetic underpinnings of APD by identifying genetic variants associated with common AP disorders in children and adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26883091      PMCID: PMC4872837          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  29 in total

1.  Genetic correlates of musical pitch recognition in humans.

Authors:  D Drayna; A Manichaikul; M de Lange ; H Snieder; T Spector
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-09       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Auditory processing deficits in reading disabled adults.

Authors:  Sygal Amitay; Meray Ahissar; Israel Nelken
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-02-27

3.  Survey of the diagnosis and management of auditory processing disorder.

Authors:  Diana C Emanuel; Kristen N Ficca; Peggy Korczak
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 1.493

4.  Simple non-invasive method to obtain DNA for gene analysis.

Authors:  N Lench; P Stanier; R Williamson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-06-18       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  The conundrums of understanding genetic risks for autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Matthew W State; Pat Levitt
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Using different criteria to diagnose (central) auditory processing disorder: how big a difference does it make?

Authors:  Wayne J Wilson; Wendy Arnott
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 7.  The importance of rapid auditory processing abilities to early language development: evidence from converging methodologies.

Authors:  April A Benasich; Jennifer J Thomas; Naseem Choudhury; Paavo H T Leppänen
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.038

8.  Nature of auditory processing disorder in children.

Authors:  David R Moore; Melanie A Ferguson; A Mark Edmondson-Jones; Sonia Ratib; Alison Riley
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Using a parental checklist to identify diagnostic groups in children with communication impairment: a validation of the Children's Communication Checklist--2.

Authors:  Courtenay Frazier Norbury; Marysia Nash; Gillian Baird; Dorothy Bishop
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  DCDC2, KIAA0319 and CMIP are associated with reading-related traits.

Authors:  Tom S Scerri; Andrew P Morris; Lyn-Louise Buckingham; Dianne F Newbury; Laura L Miller; Anthony P Monaco; Dorothy V M Bishop; Silvia Paracchini
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 13.382

View more
  5 in total

1.  Multi-level evidence of an allelic hierarchy of USH2A variants in hearing, auditory processing and speech/language outcomes.

Authors:  Peter A Perrino; Lidiya Talbot; Rose Kirkland; Amanda Hill; Amanda R Rendall; Hayley S Mountford; Jenny Taylor; Alexzandrea N Buscarello; Nayana Lahiri; Anand Saggar; R Holly Fitch; Dianne F Newbury
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2020-04-20

2.  Peripheral Anomalies in USH2A Cause Central Auditory Anomalies in a Mouse Model of Usher Syndrome and CAPD.

Authors:  Peter A Perrino; Dianne F Newbury; R Holly Fitch
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 4.096

3.  Analysis of the auditory processing skills in 1,012 children aged 6-9 confirms the adequacy of APD testing in 6-year-olds.

Authors:  Anna Guzek; Katarzyna Iwanicka-Pronicka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Effectiveness of the Auditory Temporal Ordering and Resolution Tests to Detect Central Auditory Processing Disorder in Adults With Evidence of Brain Pathology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sanathorn Chowsilpa; Doris-Eva Bamiou; Nehzat Koohi
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 5.  Is atypical rhythm a risk factor for developmental speech and language disorders?

Authors:  Enikő Ladányi; Valentina Persici; Anna Fiveash; Barbara Tillmann; Reyna L Gordon
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-04-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.