| Literature DB >> 26881000 |
Seung Min Kathy Lee1, Kang Hyun Yoon1, Jimin Park1, Hyun Soo Kim2, Jong Shin Woo2, So Ra Lee2, Kyung Hye Lee2, Hyun-Hee Jang2, Jin-Bae Kim2, Woo Shik Kim2, Sanghoon Lee1, Weon Kim2.
Abstract
Many preclinical studies show that electroacupuncture (EA) on PC6 and ST36 can reduce infarct size after ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury. Yet studies to enhance the treatment effect size are limited. The purpose of this study was to explore whether EA has additional myocardial protective effects on an ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury rat model when back-shu EA and moxibustion are added. SD rats were divided into several groups and treated with either EA only, EA + back-shu EA (B), or EA + B + moxibustion (M) for 5 consecutive days. Transthoracic echocardiography and molecular and immunohistochemical evaluations were performed. It was found that although myocardial infarct areas were significantly lower and cardiac function was also significantly preserved in the three treatment groups compared to the placebo group, there were no additional differences between the three treatment groups. In addition, HSP20 and HSP27 were expressed significantly more in the treatment groups. The results suggest that adding several treatments does not necessarily increase protection. Our study corroborates previous findings that more treatment, such as prolonging EA duration or increasing EA intensity, does not always lead to better results. Other methods of increasing treatment effect size should be explored.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26881000 PMCID: PMC4736192 DOI: 10.1155/2015/625645
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Study protocol. The control group received 30 min of anesthesia every day and no other treatment. The placebo group received acupuncture on nonacupuncture points for 20 min at the point of IR injury. The EA group received electroacupuncture on PC5, PC6, ST36, and ST37 for 20 min at the point of IR injury. The EA + B group received electroacupuncture like the EA group but was also treated with electroacupuncture on BL14 and BL15 for 20 min at the point of IR injury. The EA + B + M group received electroacupuncture like the EA + B group but was also treated with moxibustion on PC6 for 15 min for 20 min at the point of IR injury. All treatments were performed every day, and treatment was purposefully designed to overlap with time of reperfusion on the first day (D1). D, day; ischemia, ischemia induced by ligation.
Acupuncture treatment according to STRASA.
| Intervention | Item | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental animals | (a) Animal model | Nonpain model |
| (b) Details for animals | Sprague-Dawley rats of 8 to 9 weeks of age, weighing 250–300 g each | |
| (c) Experimental environment | Room temperature 24 ± 1°C, room humidity 63 ± 5% | |
|
| ||
| Type of acupuncture | (a) Statement about the type of acupuncture used | Electroacupuncture (ES-160, ITO, Tokyo, Japan) |
| (b) Rationale for treatment | Literature review and previous studies | |
|
| ||
| List of points | (a) Name of points | PC5, PC6, ST36, ST37, BL14, BL15 |
| (b) Literature sources to justify rationale | Previous literature and animal studies (listed among references) | |
| (c) Location of point | (i) PC5: approximately 2-3 cm proximal to PC6, just above the median nerve | |
|
| ||
| Needle stimulation | (a) Depth of insertion | PC5, PC6: 5 mm ST36, ST37, BL14, BL15: 1 cm |
| (b) Needle stimulation technique | Electroacupuncture (2 Hz) | |
| (c) Needle retention time | 30 min | |
| (d) Specification of needle | 0.20 × 30 mm, Dongbang Acupuncture Inc., Gyeonggi-Do, Korea | |
| (e) Responses elicited | Motor threshold response (movement of the paw and visible muscle twitches of the stimulated leg) | |
|
| ||
| Treatment regimen | (a) Number of treatment sessions | Five sessions |
| (b) Frequency of treatment | Once per day | |
|
| ||
| Cointervention | Other interventions | None |
|
| ||
| Practitioner background | (a) Duration of relevant training | Six years |
| (b) Length of clinical experience | Four years | |
| (c) Expertise in specific condition | None | |
|
| ||
| Control interventions | (a) Active comparison point | Away from acupuncture points and away from near meridians, at a shallower depth of insertion |
| (b) Control stimulation | Manual acupuncture | |
| (c) Details of control intervention | Control points for PC5, PC6: two points located between the Triple Energizer meridian and the Small Intestine meridian | |
| (d) Sources that justify choice of control | Previous studies (the selection of acupuncture points was based on the results of previous studies) | |
Standards for Reporting in Animal Studies of Acupuncture (STRASA) guidelines; PC, pericardium; ST, stomach; BL, bladder.
Figure 2Schematic diagram of treatment and acupuncture points. (a) PC5, PC6, ST35, ST36, BL14, and BL15. To needle BL14 and BL15, the back was shaved and the location of the T4/T5 thoracic spine was estimated by palpation of significant anatomical structures. (b) Placebo acupuncture points were located away from any acupuncture points or meridians. (c) Schematic diagram showing electroacupuncture (EA) and moxibustion (M) treatment of the Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. The temperature was continuously monitored using a digital thermometer (Giltron GT309, Seoul, Korea). (d) For moxibustion treatment, indirect moxibustion (M) was applied on the left PC6.
Figure 3Infarct size and fibrosis area. (a) Representative TTC staining and MTC staining heart slices of LV area. (b) Infarct size expressed as a percentage of the area at risk in rats. p < 0.05 versus the placebo group. (c) Fibrotic area of selected points expressed as a percentage of the total area. p < 0.05 versus the placebo group. EA, electroacupuncture group; EA + B, electroacupuncture + back-shu electroacupuncture group; and EA + B + M, electroacupuncture + back-shu electroacupuncture + moxibustion group.
Results of transthoracic echocardiography.
| Group |
| LVEF (%) | LVFS (%) | LVIDd (mm) | LVIDs (mm) | EDV (mL) | ESV (mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 7 | 74.91 ± 8.30 | 39.56 ± 7.80 | 6.77 ± 0.65 | 4.13 ± 0.85 | 0.72 ± 0.18 | 0.19 ± 0.09 |
| Placebo | 7 | 56.73 ± 3.89# | 25.98 ± 2.41# | 7.32 ± 0.84 | 5.42 ± 0.66 | 0.73 ± 0.34 | 0.39 ± 0.13 |
| EA | 7 | 69.03 ± 3.68 | 34.23 ± 2.83 | 7.05 ± 0.76 | 4.64 ± 0.55 | 0.81 ± 0.24 | 0.25 ± 0.08 |
| EA + B | 7 | 67.87 ± 4.19 | 33.49 ± 3.03 | 7.57 ± 0.79 | 5.03 ± 0.56 | 0.98 ± 0.28 | 0.31 ± 0.09 |
| EA + B + M | 7 | 67.72 ± 11.21 | 33.93 ± 7.26 | 7.65 ± 0.43 | 5.05 ± 0.62 | 1.00 ± 0.16 | 0.32 ± 0.12 |
Values are mean ± SE. EA, electroacupuncture group; EA + B, electroacupuncture + back-shu electroacupuncture group; EA + B + M, electroacupuncture + back-shu electroacupuncture + moxibustion group. n, number of rats in each group; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVFS, left ventricular fractional shortening; LVIDd, left ventricular internal diameters in diastole; LVIDs, left ventricular internal diameters in systole; EDV, end diastolic volume; ESV, end systolic volume. # p < 0.05 versus the control group. p < 0.05 versus the placebo group.
Figure 4Results of 2D echocardiography. (a) Ejection fraction and (b) fractional shortening of the five groups. Both ejection fraction and fractional shortening were significantly different between the placebo group and the three treatment groups. EA, electroacupuncture group; EA + B, electroacupuncture + back-shu electroacupuncture group; and EA + B + M, electroacupuncture + back-shu electroacupuncture + moxibustion group. ### p < 0.05 versus the control group and p < 0.05 versus the placebo group. p < 0.01 versus the placebo group.
Figure 5HSP20, HSP27, and HSP70 expression. (a) The production of HSP20, HSP27, and HSP70 as detected by Western blotting. (b) Overexpression of HSP20 and HSP27 in the three treatment groups compared to placebo group. EA, electroacupuncture group; EA + B, electroacupuncture group + back-shu electroacupuncture group; EA + B + M, electroacupuncture group + back-shu + moxibustion group.