Literature DB >> 23953384

Cardioprotective and prognostic effects of remote ischaemic preconditioning in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: a single-centre randomised, double-blind, controlled trial.

Matthias Thielmann1, Eva Kottenberg, Petra Kleinbongard, Daniel Wendt, Nilgün Gedik, Susanne Pasa, Vivien Price, Konstantinos Tsagakis, Markus Neuhäuser, Jürgen Peters, Heinz Jakob, Gerd Heusch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Remote ischaemic preconditioning has been associated with reduced risk of myocardial injury after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. We investigated the safety and efficacy of this procedure.
METHODS: Eligible patients were those scheduled to undergo elective isolated first-time CABG surgery under cold crystalloid cardioplegia and cardiopulmonary bypass at the West-German Heart Centre, Essen, Germany, between April, 2008, and October, 2012. Patients were prospectively randomised to receive remote ischaemic preconditioning (three cycles of 5 min ischaemia and 5 min reperfusion in the left upper arm after induction of anaesthesia) or no ischaemic preconditioning (control). The primary endpoint was myocardial injury, as reflected by the geometric mean area under the curve (AUC) for perioperative concentrations of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) in serum in the first 72 h after CABG. Mortality was the main safety endpoint. Analysis was done in intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01406678.
FINDINGS: 329 patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics and perioperative data did not differ between groups. cTnI AUC was 266 ng/mL over 72 h (95% CI 237-298) in the remote ischaemic preconditioning group and 321 ng/mL (287-360) in the control group. In the intention-to-treat population, the ratio of remote ischaemic preconditioning to control for cTnI AUC was 0·83 (95% CI 0·70-0·97, p=0·022). cTnI release remained lower in the per-protocol analysis (0·79, 0·66-0·94, p=0·001). All-cause mortality was assessed over 1·54 (SD 1·22) years and was lower with remote ischaemic preconditioning than without (ratio 0·27, 95% CI 0·08-0·98, p=0·046).
INTERPRETATION: Remote ischaemic preconditioning provided perioperative myocardial protection and improved the prognosis of patients undergoing elective CABG surgery. FUNDING: German Research Foundation.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23953384     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61450-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  153 in total

1.  Interventional cardiology: ischaemic POSTconditioning-a long harvest for a little corn.

Authors:  Michel Ovize; Nathan Mewton
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Current Modalities and Mechanisms Underlying Cardioprotection by Ischemic Conditioning.

Authors:  John H Rosenberg; John H Werner; Michael J Moulton; Devendra K Agrawal
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 3.  Ischaemic conditioning: pitfalls on the path to clinical translation.

Authors:  Karin Przyklenk
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Can the interchangeability of somatic oximeters in cardiac surgery inform cerebral applications?

Authors:  Hessam H Kashani; Hilary P Grocott
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 5.  Practical guidelines for rigor and reproducibility in preclinical and clinical studies on cardioprotection.

Authors:  Hans Erik Bøtker; Derek Hausenloy; Ioanna Andreadou; Salvatore Antonucci; Kerstin Boengler; Sean M Davidson; Soni Deshwal; Yvan Devaux; Fabio Di Lisa; Moises Di Sante; Panagiotis Efentakis; Saveria Femminò; David García-Dorado; Zoltán Giricz; Borja Ibanez; Efstathios Iliodromitis; Nina Kaludercic; Petra Kleinbongard; Markus Neuhäuser; Michel Ovize; Pasquale Pagliaro; Michael Rahbek-Schmidt; Marisol Ruiz-Meana; Klaus-Dieter Schlüter; Rainer Schulz; Andreas Skyschally; Catherine Wilder; Derek M Yellon; Peter Ferdinandy; Gerd Heusch
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 17.165

Review 6.  Cardioprotection by remote ischemic conditioning and its signal transduction.

Authors:  Petra Kleinbongard; Andreas Skyschally; Gerd Heusch
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 7.  Cardioprotection by remote ischemic conditioning: Mechanisms and clinical evidences.

Authors:  Alberto Aimo; Chiara Borrelli; Alberto Giannoni; Luigi Emilio Pastormerlo; Andrea Barison; Gianluca Mirizzi; Michele Emdin; Claudio Passino
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-26

8.  Organ protective mechanisms common to extremes of physiology: a window through hibernation biology.

Authors:  Quintin J Quinones; Qing Ma; Zhiquan Zhang; Brian M Barnes; Mihai V Podgoreanu
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.326

Review 9.  [Acute kidney injury in the perioperative setting].

Authors:  D Kindgen-Milles
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 10.  Perioperative cognitive protection.

Authors:  C Brown; S Deiner
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 9.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.