Christian Herweh1, Peter A Ringleb2, Geraldine Rauch3, Steven Gerry4, Lars Behrens1, Markus Möhlenbruch1, Rebecca Gottorf2, Daniel Richter2, Simon Schieber2, Simon Nagel5. 1. Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany. 2. Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany. 3. Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Germany. 4. Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom. 5. Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany simon.nagel@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS) is an established 10-point quantitative topographic computed tomography scan score to assess early ischemic changes. We compared the performance of the e-ASPECTS software with those of stroke physicians at different professional levels. METHODS: The baseline computed tomography scans of acute stroke patients, in whom computed tomography and diffusion-weighted imaging scans were obtained less than two hours apart, were retrospectively scored by e-ASPECTS as well as by three stroke experts and three neurology trainees blinded to any clinical information. The ground truth was defined as the ASPECTS on diffusion-weighted imaging scored by another two non-blinded independent experts on consensus basis. Sensitivity and specificity in an ASPECTS region-based and an ASPECTS score-based analysis as well as receiver-operating characteristic curves, Bland-Altman plots with mean score error, and Matthews correlation coefficients were calculated. Comparisons were made between the human scorers and e-ASPECTS with diffusion-weighted imaging being the ground truth. Two methods for clustered data were used to estimate sensitivity and specificity in the region-based analysis. RESULTS: In total, 34 patients were included and 680 (34 × 20) ASPECTS regions were scored. Mean time from onset to computed tomography was 172 ± 135 min and mean time difference between computed tomographyand magnetic resonance imaging was 41 ± 31 min. The region-based sensitivity (46.46% [CI: 30.8;62.1]) of e-ASPECTS was better than three trainees and one expert (p ≤ 0.01) and not statistically different from another two experts. Specificity (94.15% [CI: 91.7;96.6]) was lower than one expert and one trainee (p < 0.01) and not statistically different to the other four physicians. e-ASPECTS had the best Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.44 (experts: 0.38 ± 0.08 and trainees: 0.19 ± 0.05) and the lowest mean score error of 0.56 (experts: 1.44 ± 1.79 and trainees: 1.97 ± 2.12). CONCLUSION: e-ASPECTS showed a similar performance to that of stroke experts in the assessment of brain computed tomographys of acute ischemic stroke patients with the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score method.
BACKGROUND: The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS) is an established 10-point quantitative topographic computed tomography scan score to assess early ischemic changes. We compared the performance of the e-ASPECTS software with those of stroke physicians at different professional levels. METHODS: The baseline computed tomography scans of acute strokepatients, in whom computed tomography and diffusion-weighted imaging scans were obtained less than two hours apart, were retrospectively scored by e-ASPECTS as well as by three stroke experts and three neurology trainees blinded to any clinical information. The ground truth was defined as the ASPECTS on diffusion-weighted imaging scored by another two non-blinded independent experts on consensus basis. Sensitivity and specificity in an ASPECTS region-based and an ASPECTS score-based analysis as well as receiver-operating characteristic curves, Bland-Altman plots with mean score error, and Matthews correlation coefficients were calculated. Comparisons were made between the human scorers and e-ASPECTS with diffusion-weighted imaging being the ground truth. Two methods for clustered data were used to estimate sensitivity and specificity in the region-based analysis. RESULTS: In total, 34 patients were included and 680 (34 × 20) ASPECTS regions were scored. Mean time from onset to computed tomography was 172 ± 135 min and mean time difference between computed tomographyand magnetic resonance imaging was 41 ± 31 min. The region-based sensitivity (46.46% [CI: 30.8;62.1]) of e-ASPECTS was better than three trainees and one expert (p ≤ 0.01) and not statistically different from another two experts. Specificity (94.15% [CI: 91.7;96.6]) was lower than one expert and one trainee (p < 0.01) and not statistically different to the other four physicians. e-ASPECTS had the best Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.44 (experts: 0.38 ± 0.08 and trainees: 0.19 ± 0.05) and the lowest mean score error of 0.56 (experts: 1.44 ± 1.79 and trainees: 1.97 ± 2.12). CONCLUSION: e-ASPECTS showed a similar performance to that of stroke experts in the assessment of brain computed tomographys of acute ischemic strokepatients with the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score method.
Authors: Garry Choy; Omid Khalilzadeh; Mark Michalski; Synho Do; Anthony E Samir; Oleg S Pianykh; J Raymond Geis; Pari V Pandharipande; James A Brink; Keith J Dreyer Journal: Radiology Date: 2018-06-26 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Juliane Goebel; Elena Stenzel; Nika Guberina; Isabel Wanke; Martin Koehrmann; Christoph Kleinschnitz; Lale Umutlu; Michael Forsting; Christoph Moenninghoff; Alexander Radbruch Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2018-09-15 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Nika Guberina; U Dietrich; A Radbruch; J Goebel; C Deuschl; A Ringelstein; M Köhrmann; C Kleinschnitz; M Forsting; C Mönninghoff Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2018-07-31 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: H Kuang; M Najm; D Chakraborty; N Maraj; S I Sohn; M Goyal; M D Hill; A M Demchuk; B K Menon; W Qiu Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: V K Sundaram; J Goldstein; D Wheelwright; A Aggarwal; P S Pawha; A Doshi; J T Fifi; R De Leacy; J Mocco; J Puig; K Nael Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Iris Q Grunwald; Johann Kulikovski; Wolfgang Reith; Stephen Gerry; Rafael Namias; Maria Politi; Panagiotis Papanagiotou; Marco Essig; Shrey Mathur; Olivier Joly; Khawar Hussain; Viola Wagner; Sweni Shah; George Harston; Julija Vlahovic; Silke Walter; Anna Podlasek; Klaus Fassbender Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2019-06-19 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Waleed Brinjikji; Mehdi Abbasi; Catherine Arnold; John C Benson; Sherry A Braksick; Norbert Campeau; Carrie M Carr; Petrice M Cogswell; James P Klaas; Greta B Liebo; Jason T Little; Patrick H Luetmer; Steven A Messina; Alex A Nagelschneider; Kara M Schwartz; Christopher P Wood; Deena M Nasr; David F Kallmes Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2021-04-14 Impact factor: 1.610