Edward J Carr1, James Dooley2,3, Michelle A Linterman1, Adrian Liston2,3, Josselyn E Garcia-Perez2,3, Vasiliki Lagou2,3,4, James C Lee5, Carine Wouters3, Isabelle Meyts3, An Goris4, Guy Boeckxstaens6. 1. Lymphocyte Signaling and Development ISP, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK. 2. Translational Immunology Laboratory, VIB, Leuven 3000, Belgium. 3. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium. 4. Department of Neurosciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 5. Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0XY, UK; Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK. 6. Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
Detailed population-level description of the human immune system has recently become achievable. We used a 'systems-level' approach to establish a resource of cellular immune profiles of 670 healthy individuals. We report a high level of interindividual variation, with low longitudinal variation, at the level of cellular subset composition of the immune system. Despite the profound effects of antigen exposure on individual antigen-specific clones, the cellular subset structure proved highly elastic, with transient vaccination-induced changes followed by a return to the individual's unique baseline. Notably, the largest influence on immunological variation identified was cohabitation, with 50% less immunological variation between individuals who share an environment (as parents) than between people in the wider population. These results identify local environmental conditions as a key factor in shaping the human immune system.
Detailed population-level description of the human immune system has recently become achievable. We used a 'systems-level' approach to establish a resource of cellular immune profiles of 670 healthy individuals. We report a high level of interindividual variation, with low longitudinal variation, at the level of cellular subset composition of the immune system. Despite the profound effects of antigen exposure on individual antigen-specific clones, the cellular subset structure proved highly elastic, with transient vaccination-induced changes followed by a return to the individual's unique baseline. Notably, the largest influence on immunological variation identified was cohabitation, with 50% less immunological variation between individuals who share an environment (as parents) than between people in the wider population. These results identify local environmental conditions as a key factor in shaping the human immune system.
Enormous progress has been made in understanding the cellular and molecular
components of the immune system. The key tool in this progression has been the use
of mouse models, especially genetically modified models that have allowed the
functional dissection of the myriad of interconnecting components. Despite this
progress in mouse models, or, perhaps because of it, it has been convincingly argued
that the focus of immunology should return to the human context1, including a comprehensive analysis of the full spectrum of
immunological diversity, and the causes thereof.Several recent studies have embraced this call for investigating human
immunological diversity, identifying genetic factors as accounting for
~25-50% of measured immunological variation 2, 3, 4. A recent twin-study indicated that at least half of the
immune trait variance is explained by non-genetic factors 3. Similarly the mean heritability of immune traits reported by
a quantitative trail locus (QTL) study in healthy Sardinians was 41% 2. The ImmVar project, which tested for gene
expression QTLs in circulating human immune cells, estimated that approximately 22%
of the variance in gene expression is explained by genetic factors 4. Together these studies suggest that the
immunoprofile of the healthy population is governed in a large part by non-genetic
factors. As these non-genetic factors predominate, and arguably are more amenable to
clinical manipulation, it is critical for us to identify and quantify the key
factors that shape the human immune landscape.Using hypothesis-based approaches, several non-genetic factors have already
been identified which influence the landscape of the human immune system. Chronic
infections, in particular latent herpesvirus infection, are associated with a
panoply of immunological changes and discordance for CMV seropositivity in
monozygotic twin pairs resulted in weaker pairwise correlations for many immune
parameters 3. Another important non-genetic
impact on the immune system is ageing, with potent effects on both the innate and
adaptive arms of the immune response 5. Within
the adaptive system, ageing is associated with a decline in naïve T cells
6. In mice, this is due to thymic
involution, however, in humans, loss of naïve CD4+ T cells is
primarily driven by a failure of peripheral replication of naïve cells 7, 8,
again demonstrating the importance of direct assessment of human immunology rather
than relying entirely on the mouse (and, indeed, far too often on a single inbred
strain).In the present study, we profiled the immune system of 670 healthy human
volunteers, aged 2 to 86 years old, to provide a description of the population-level
heterogeneity present in the cellular composition of the circulating immune system.
Through the targeted recruitment of sub-cohorts with longitudinal sampling before
and after severe immunological challenge, we were able to determine that the
immunological diversity between individuals is highly robust, with an elastic return
to the unique steady state of the individual following immunological challenge. We
report that co-parenting profoundly reduces the immunological variation between two
individuals, suggesting that environmental influences can drive convergence as well
as diversity within our immunological profile.
Results
Elasticity of the human cellular immune system
To investigate diversity in the composition of the human immune system,
we developed an immune phenotyping platform quantifying 54 distinct
immunological parameters by flow cytometry and serum analysis, with a focus on
cellular subsets within the adaptive immune system. Following optimization, we
recruited 638 healthy Belgian individuals for immune profiling, ranging from 2
to 86 years of age and free from self-reported gastrointestinal, autoimmune or
inflammatory disease (Supplementary Table 1). Of these, 140 individuals were recruited as
70 pairs (co-parents of children). 177 individuals were sampled at multiple
time-points (average of 6 months between sampling) to allow the measurement of
longitudinal variation. Within this longitudinal cohort we targeted individuals
who were planning to travel with a high risk of developing gastroenteritis and
obtained before and after travel samples for 50 individuals. In total, 921
samples from 638 individuals were assessed over a period of 3 years.As an exploratory analysis of the dataset, we examined the degree and
structure of the variation. Substantial variation was observed in all of the
immunological parameters measured (Supplementary Table 2). To determine whether there were
underlying patterns within the variation, we performed unsupervised hierarchical
clustering (Fig. 1a). The strongest
clustering was observed between parameters manually annotated as
“precursor” cell types, with recent thymic emigrant (RTE) CD4 T
cells, RTE CD8 T cells, naïve CD4 T cells and naïve CD8 T cells
forming a single cluster (Fig. 1). This
cluster was robust, being identified through iterative re-clustering (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Parameters within the other manually annotated groups (humoral, inflammatory,
regulatory, core cell types, cytokines) were distributed throughout the
hierarchy. Using multi-dimensional scaling (MDS), we identified, in a
data-driven manner, co-correlations between precursor populations (Fig. 1b). As precursor parameters separated
from the rest of the parameters along the first dimension, this represents the
largest source of variability between immune parameters, suggesting more
co-ordinated biological control of these particular subsets. These data
demonstrate that there is a high degree of variation in the immunological
profiles of healthy individuals, with the largest component of the variation
being a co-regulated change in the frequency of naïve or precursor cell
types. Activated cell types and products, by contrast, demonstrated only minor
co-regulation (with several biologically-relevant exceptions, such as between
TH1 and TC1 cells).
Figure 1
Data-driven analysis of immunological variation reveals biologically meaningful
co-correlations between individual immune parameters. (a) On the
complete dataset of 638 individuals (most recent sample only), a dendrogram of
immune parameters was generated by hierarchical clustering on Euclidean
distances of Spearman correlations between each parameter (left). Correlation
plots using pairwise Spearman correlation coefficients between each two
immunological parameters are shown (right). Coefficients are shown by the angle
of eclipse (left-leaning, negative; right-leaning, positive) and colour (blue,
negative; red, positive). Manually annotated thematic groups of immune
parameters are shown by the colour bar next to the dendrogram. (b)
Non-metric multidimensional scaling of pairwise Spearman correlations. The
dataset is reduced from 54 immune parameters (54 dimensions) to a 2 dimensional
representation, an exploratory approach to investigate the presence or absence
of inter-relatedness between immune parameters. Each immune parameter is a point
and the thematic groups are highlighted.
To determine whether immunological variation represented a dynamic
process of change within individuals or a spectrum of different stable
equilibria between individuals, we used the longitudinal sub-cohort of 177
individuals to ANOVA model with 2 independent variables – the
volunteer’s unique identifier and the sample time-point (Fig. 2). Each immune parameter (Supplementary Table 2)
was used as the response variable in these models (Fig. 2). The majority of the variation in each parameter was
explained by a model of stable intra-individual immune profiles over
longitudinal sampling (Fig. 2a), with a
median R of 0.84 across the parameters (range,
0.5-1.0) and 60% of models maintaining statistical significance after correction
for multiple testing (Fig. 2b). Variation
between repeat samples of individuals, by contrast, contributed very little to
the observed total variation, with a median proportion of
R of 0.017 (range, 0.004-0.066), whereas
intra-individual variation explained a much larger effect with a median
proportion of R of 0.983 (range, 0.934-0.996)
(Fig. 2c). Thus, of the total variation
observed within our dataset, the majority (84%) can be explained by a model that
includes both inter-individual and intra-individual variation, with just 1.4%
attributable to the intra-individual variation between sample time-points. This
stability in the cellular immune profile of individuals over an extended
sampling period is consistent with that observed by other flow cytometry-based
studies 2, 3, 9, and is consistent with a
diverse set of stable equilibria observed between individuals.
Figure 2
The human immune system is robustly maintained in multiple stable equilibriums.
177 individuals were sampled at least twice, allowing a dissection of inter-
versus intra-individual variation. (a) Linear models were made for
each immune parameter based on the multiple samples from each individual (ANOVA
model: immune parameter ~ subject identifier + visit number). Open
circles represent models built using all individuals (n=638)
with multiple visits (177 individuals with up to 3 repeat visits; 921 visits in
total). The filled circles represent models using only individuals who were
continuously healthy between visits (152 individuals), filled squares represent
models using only individuals who experienced acute gastroenteritis between
their samples (24 individuals). For each cohort, R
values and (b) -log10 of Bonferroni adjusted
P values are shown for the linear models. (c)
Proportion of the R values from all volunteers
attributable to either inter-individual differences or intra-individual
differences. (d) Multidimensional scaling of the pre- and
post-travel study visits. Each individual is represented twice; their first and
second visits depicted with a dot or diamond respectively and linked by a grey
line indicating immunological distance (50 individuals; 100 visits).
Continuously healthy individuals (n=26) are shown in aqua,
individuals with intervening acute gastroenteritis (n=24) are
shown in orange. (e) Quantification of the immunological distance
between the first and second visits for continuously healthy individuals
(n=26) versus individuals with intervening acute
gastroenteritis (n=24). A two-tailed Mann-Whitney test was used
to compare the immunological distances.
Having established that the relationship between immune subsets within an
individual is highly stable over time, we sought to determine whether this
stability was elastic or fragile. Within our dataset, we included a sub-cohort
of fifty individuals who were sampled before and after travel to a developing
nation, where there is an elevated risk of acquiring gastrointestinal infection.
Of this sub-cohort, 24 individuals developed acute gastroenteritis whilst abroad
and 26 did not (Supplementary
Fig. 2a). Of these cases, 22 were classified as moderate or classic
gastroenteritis with a median of 2 days of diarrhoea. Individuals were requested
not to use antibiotics during this gastrointestinal challenge unless clinically
indicated (87.5% did not use antibiotics), to allow a natural immune response to
take course. Given the activation of the immune system during infection, as well
as the importance of the gut microbiome 10, this experimental design allowed the determination of whether a
combined immunological and microbiological disturbance would act as a
“reset” on the immunological landscape, with individuals
stabilising at an alternative equilibria point after the resolution of
infection. To test this hypothesis, we repeated our earlier analysis of
intra-individual variation by segregating the population into individuals that
were continuously healthy during the sampling period and individuals that
experienced acute gastrointestinal challenge between samples. No substantive
effect was seen for gastrointestinal interlude on any single immunological
parameter, with the modest changes in R (Fig. 2a) being driven by reduced numbers in
subsets, as indicated by the accompanying reductions in P
values (Fig. 2b). Notably TH17
cells, the cell type with the most compelling microbiome-interaction evidence
11, were unaffected in this analysis
(Fig. 2a,b and Supplementary Fig. 3).
Having failed to identify single immune parameters altered by immunological
perturbation, we performed multi-dimensional scaling on paired samples to test
whether severe gastrointestinal infection had an effect via the cumulative
effect of minor changes on multiple parameters (Fig. 2d). In this analysis, multi-dimensions (representing each of
54 immune parameters) are reduced to 2 dimensions. Samples (either different
visits or different individuals) that are closer together are more similar;
those further apart are more dissimilar. The individuals affected by the
diarrhoeal immunological insult did not separate from the rest of the data and
the “immunological distance” between longitudinal samples was no
greater than that of individuals who were continuously healthy (Fig. 2e). Even among the subset of patients
with the longest duration of gastroenteritis (≥4 days) no increase in
immunological distance was observed (Supplementary Fig. 2). Together our analyses demonstrate
that not only can the human immune system exist in a diverse set of stable
equilibria, but that these equilibria are maintained following immunological and
microbiological disturbances, with each individual returning back to the
original steady state following the resolution of infection. This result does
not exclude functional or numerical changes within the response clones
(expansion, conversion to a memory phenotype), but instead refers to the overall
cell subset structure of the immune system. One possible explanation for this is
that the number of antigen-specific memory cells remaining following
immunological challenge are few in number 12, 13, 14, and the intrinsic biases in the individual that make up
the prior immune status also apply to newly expanded clones. Thus, while
individual responding T cell and B cell clones may change markedly as a response
to activation, the functional landscape in which they assimilate remains
intact.The real world context of gastrointestinal infection results in several
study limitations, with the inability to take a peak-infection sample and
variation in the sampling schedule and infection. To overcome these intrinsic
caveats, we initiated an independent cohort to assess how a defined
immunological stimulus, influenza vaccination, impacts on the immune landscape.
32 healthy English individuals, between 53 and 64 years of age, were recruited
during the 2014-2015 winter influenza vaccination season. Volunteers were
sampled prior to intramuscular vaccination with the standard seasonal
inactivated influenza vaccine, and at 7 and 42 days post-vaccination. Samples
were then phenotyped on a parallel immune phenotyping platform, which replicated
the variation structure and substructure present in the Belgian cohort (Supplementary Fig. 4).
Analysis of individual immune parameters indicated that most parameters remained
unchanged throughout the study (Fig. 3a and
Supplementary Fig.
5). The exceptions were circulating follicular T helper-like cells
(cTFH), proliferating CD4+ T cells (Ki67+)
and plasmablasts, all of which demonstrated marked increases at day 7, before
returning to baseline at day 42 (Fig. 3b).
To determine whether the immunological challenge of vaccination disrupted the
immune landscape of the volunteers, we built a longitudinal ANOVA model. Between
day 0 and day 7, almost the entire variation could be accounted for by
inter-individual variation, with the exception of the three vaccination response
parameters, where sample time-point (intra-individual variation)(Fig. 3c). With the resolution of the vaccine
response (assessing day 0 and 42 time-points), even the vaccination response
parameters showed no substantial time-point (intra-individual) variation (Fig. 3d), demonstrating that even perturbed
parameters rebounded to pre-challenge settings. This is consistent with previous
systems vaccinology papers that describe an alteration in the gene expression
profile of peripheral blood samples in the first two-weeks following
vaccination, followed by a return to baseline state 12, 15, 16. To demonstrate the global robustness of
the immunological landscape, we used multidimensional scaling. This analysis
indicated clustering of samples by individual rather than time-point (Fig. 3e), with low immunological distances
between samples (Fig. 3f). To test whether
the return to baseline was a population level process or whether each individual
returned to their own unique baseline, we calculated a Z-score for each
immunological parameter for each individual at day 0 and day 7. A strong
correlation (R2 0.74, P<2x10-16) was observed
(Fig. 3g), indicating that individuals
regained their relative inter-individual differences after vaccination. In all,
using an independent immunological challenge, these results show significant
stability of human immune cell subsets, and indicate an elastic ability to
respond to antigen before returning to a baseline state.
Figure 3
Immunologial equilibria demonstrate elasticity following influenza vaccination.
In a parallel cohort of 32 English individuals, volunteers were sampled prior to
vaccination, with follow-up samples at day 7 and day 42 post-vaccination.
(a) Samples were phenotyped, normalised to the day 0 value and
assessed for change using paired t-tests. Unchanged variables are shown in grey,
significantly modified variables are shown in red, with (b)
boxplots for each significant immune parameter. Each parameter is labeled on the
graph with an (uncorrected, two tailed) paired t-test P value.
Boxes show median and interquartile ranges (IQRs), whiskers extend to 1.5 x IQR.
(c) A linear model was made for each immune parameter based on
the multiple samples from each individual (ANOVA model: immune parameter
~ subject identifier + visit number). For each parameter the proportion
of the R values from all volunteers attributable to
either inter-individual differences or intra-individual differences was assessed
for day 0 and 7 or (d) day 0 and 42. (e)
Multidimensional scaling of the vaccination time-points. Each individual is
represented at day 0 (green), 7 (red) and 42 (blue) and linked by a grey line
indicating immunological distance (32 individuals; 96 visits). (f)
Quantification of the immunological distance between day 0 and 7, 7 and 42, and
0 and 42 for each volunteer (n=32), with paired t-test.
(g) For each volunteer, a Z-score was calculated for each
parameter at day 0 and 42, indicating standard deviations from the mean value.
Correlation analysis indicates the line of best fit. *, p<0.001;
**,p<0.0001.
Age and cohabitation affect the immunological landscape
Having established the diversity of elastic stable equilibria in the
human immune system, we sought to determine the underlying biological drivers.
As the variability was greatest in the precursor populations, we first
investigated the effect of age on immune profile. Our dataset includes
individuals ranging from 2 to 86 years of age, with substantial numbers of both
children (<18 years, n=40) and older persons (>65
years, n=54). Strong relationships, both positive and negative,
were observed between immune parameters and age (Fig. 4a-c). Using a threshold of adjusted
p<0.01 and r<-0.35 or
r>0.35 (see Supplementary Fig. 6 and Supplementary Table 2),
three immune parameters had a negative relationship with age and seven had a
positive relationship with age. CD4+ RTE (Fig. 4b), transitional B cells (Fig. 4c) and CD8+ RTE (Fig. 4d) were all reduced in a linear fashion as individuals
aged, consistent with an age-dependent reduction in thymus and bone-marrow
activity. We observed a positive relationship of several inflammatory
populations with age, namely TH1 cells (Figure 4E), CD4+IL-2+ cells (Fig. 4f), TC1 cells (Fig. 4g), CD8+IL-2+
cells (Fig. 4h) and iNKT
cells (Fig. 4j), and an age-associated
increase in CD8+ T cells (Fig.
4i). Despite finding significantly more Th1-associated cells with
age, serum IFN-γ did not reach our threshold for correlation coefficient
(r=0.18 [95% CI 0.06-0.29]; adjusted
P=5.2x10-3). We did, however, identify IL-6,
another pro-inflammatory cytokine as significantly increased with age (Fig. 4k). Together these data demonstrate
that age is a major contributor to the immune profile of healthy individuals,
with a successive downregulation of precursor populations and an upregulation of
TH1-associated inflammatory populations with age. Interestingly,
the data-points from two extremes of age (<18 and >65 years old),
do not have larger variances than the central ages. This observation suggests,
at least for these immune parameters, that paediatric and geriatric immunology
are not “special cases” with different rules, but rather follow a
set of continuous influences.
Figure 4
Age is a major determinant of immunological equilibria. (a) Each
immune parameter was correlated with age and each other immune parameter using
pairwise Spearman r values. The arrangement of the immune
parameters is determined by their correlation with age. Inset panels show
Spearman’s r (upper) and -log10 Bonferroni
corrected P values (lower) plotted against age.
(b)
R for each immune parameter for models
incorporating gender (filled circles), age (grey squares) or both gender and age
(open circles) as the independent variable(s), with (c)
accompanying -log10 of Bonferroni corrected P
values. (d) to (m) Individual scatterplots for each of
the immune parameters with significant association with age. The percentage
values of the flow parameters, or log10 cytokine concentrations, are
plotted against age, with women in red, men in blue and linear regression lines
for the whole cohort in black. Data shown for (d) CD4+
RTE (p=3x10-18), (e) transitional B cells
(p=8x10-7), (f) CD8+ RTE
(p=1x10-8), (g) TH1
(p=3x10-20), (h) CD4+ IL-2+ T
cells (p=5x10-23), (i) Tc1 (p=5x10-31),
(j) CD8+ IL-2+ T cells
(p=8x10-33), (k) CD8+ T cells
(p=8x10-11) (l)
iNKT cells (p=6x10-10) and (m) serum
IL-6 (p=7x10-11).
There are well-defined differences in ageing-related diseases between
the genders. We therefore assessed whether any of the immune parameters were
associated with gender, while controlling for age. We found that gender added no
explanatory power to a model already including age, with essentially no effect
on the variance of each immune parameter with a median difference in
R of 0.006 (Fig. 4b,c). The only significant effects of gender on the immune
profile was an increase in CD4+ T cell numbers in women compared to
men, with a median CD4+ T cell frequency of 17.8% in women and 14.6%
in men (adjusted P=1.3x10-3), consistent with
previous reports 17.To extend the analysis on physiological influences on immune profiles,
we assessed body mass index (BMI), anxiety and depression in a subset of adult
volunteers (>18 years). BMI provided two significant associations with
immune parameters: CD4+IL-2+ (adjusted
P=0.03) and IL-6 (P=0.007), however their
effect sizes were modest, with an R of 0.06 and
0.09, respectively (Fig. 5a,b). As an extra
complexity, there is a relationship between BMI and age (Fig. 5c), with a tendency for BMI to increase with age. To
control for this, we built both age and BMI into our model. For all the age-BMI
immune associations, with the exception of IL-6, BMI was the minor contributor
to the observed variation, with age playing a much greater role (Fig. 5d). By contrast, serum concentrations
of IL-6, an adipose-associated cytokine, was equally influenced by both age and
BMI (Fig. 5d). Many of the other changes
associated with BMI in the literature 18,
19, 20, 21 were not observed in
our dataset. This discrepancy may be due to inadequate controlling for age in
prior studies (based on the relative strength of associations observed here,
using age as a category rather than as a linear variable would substantially
over-estimate the effect of BMI), or a relative lack of individuals at the
extreme ends of the BMI scale in the current study. To investigate a potential
neuro-immunological connection, we sought to determine whether anxiety and
depression scores 19 altered immune
parameters, however no substantial or significant effects were observed (Fig. 5e). Together, these data indicate that
BMI, depression or anxiety do not substantively alter immune equilibria point of
healthy individuals, beyond the association of BMI with serum IL-6
concentrations.
Figure 5
Immunoprofile is not influenced by BMI, depression, or anxiety. (a)
R for each immune parameter for models
incorporating BMI (filled circles; 213 individuals), age (filled squares; 367
individuals) or both BMI and age (open circles; 213 individuals) as the
independent variable(s), with (b) accompanying -log10 of
Bonferroni corrected P values. Analysis excluded children
(<18 years). (c) Relationship between BMI and age in the
analysed cohort. (d) The relative R
contributions of age and BMI to immune parameters that were significant in a
model including both BMI and age (adjusted P<0.05).
(e)
R and -log10 adjusted P
values for each immune parameter for a model incorporating HADS anxiety score
and HADS depression score (235 individuals).
Finally, we sought to determine whether cohabitation had an impact on
immune equilibria. Within our study, we sampled 70 parental pairs (adults, 18 to
65, with one or more children living at home). From these 140 individuals we
could ask whether a shared environment altered immunoprofiles. Our hypothesis
was that the immunoprofiles of a parental pair would be more closely related
than a random in silico male:female pairing. To test this
assertion, we used multi-dimensional scaling to reduce the diversity of the
immune system down to two dimensions (Fig.
6a) and linked each pair with a line. We measured the distance
between mother and father for all parental pairs (Fig. 6b) and compared this to the distance between randomly
generated pairings (Fig. 6b). We found that
there was a significant and substantial (~50%) reduction in the immune
variability between genuine parental pairs compared to the randomised, null
pairs, suggesting that a shared environment drives a convergence between
immunoprofile. This effect was independent of age, as exclusion of the
identified age-related parameters gave no difference in the result (Supplementary Fig. 7).
Likewise, measurement of cytokine production following in vitro
stimulations of PBMCs demonstrated significant convergence between the profiles
of parents (Supplementary Fig.
8), demonstrating that the effect extends to alternative
methodologies. These results demonstrate that while the immunological equilibria
point is robust and stable within an individual, two individuals in a close
relationship converge towards a single immunological equilibria point.
Figure 6
Parenthood shapes the immune system towards a shared equilibria. (a)
140 individuals were identified as adult (18-65 years) biological parents with a
child still living at home. The immune profile (54 parameters) was compressed
using multidimensional scaling (k=2) of the correlation matrix between
individuals, visualising pairwise Spearman’s correlation coefficients
between each individual. The immunological distance between each male:female
pair is indicated by the connecting gray line. (b) The
immunological distance, as measured by multidimensional scaling, between
parental pairs versus random male:female pairs. To generate the random
distribution, each male was computationally paired in a random fashion with 5
females from the parental dataset. Distributions were compared using a
two-tailed Mann-Whitney test. *, p=8x10-11.
Discussion
Non-genetic factors are estimated to account for ~50-75% of
immunological variation between healthy individuals 2, 3, 4, yet a thorough understanding of the causative factors at play
remains lacking. Through the use of a systems immunology approach and targeted
sub-cohorts of healthy individuals, we were able to assess the main non-genetic
factors. Of the intrinsic factors of age, BMI, sex and psychological state, an
individual’s age was the most important influence on their immunological
landscape. This result complements longstanding observations that immune function
(response to vaccination, infection, cancer immunosurveillance) deteriorates with
age. The reduction in T cell precursors may be explained by thymic involution 22, however the highly concordant decrease in
transitional B cells, suggests a common root cause, such as impaired bone-marrow
function 23. The age-dependent increase in
TH1-associated populations is striking because TH2 and
TH17 cell populations did not show an association with age,
demonstrating that this effect is specific to the TH1 arm of the immune
system, rather than a generic increase in T cell activation. Overall, for the 10
age-associated traits, the combined effect of age and genetics appears to account
for almost the entire variability in the human population. In the current study, the
median age-dependent R for these traits was 0.13. The
median published heritability for these traits (R for
genetic effects) 3, is 0.67. We estimate that
for age-related immune parameters, ~80% of their variation would be
explicable by age and genetic factors, with more variability potentially explained
by age-genetic interaction. It is intriguing that the immune parameters that are
age-related have higher heritability estimates than the rest of the immunoprofile
3.The immunological effect of BMI could perhaps be best regarded as a minor
acceleration in the normal immunoageing process. The striking exception to the
negligible effect of BMI was the positive association with serum IL-6
concentrations. One possibility is that this IL-6 is “non-immune” in
origin, as monocytes from older individuals secrete less IL-6 in response to TLR
ligation 5. While the precise cellular origin
of increased IL-6 in aged and high BMI humans is unknown, a plausible candidate is
vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). Aged VSMC from mice and non-human primates
produce more IL-6 than younger controls 24,
25, while obesity increases the
inflammatory phenotype of VSMCs 26. With the
complex biological functions of IL-6 27, this
effect could partially account for the alteration of clinical outcomes that obesity
has on diseases such heart failure.We found very little effect of gender on the immune landscape. This is at
odds to the longstanding observation that autoimmune diseases are, in general, more
frequent in women than men (at pre-menopausal ages) and that vaccine responses are
reportedly more robust in women than men 28,
although the sex difference in vaccine response varies greatly 28
29
30. Notably, the gender-based differences are
more limited at the cellular level compared to the molecular level 31. The incomplete correlation between gene
signature and cell type suggests that the discrepancy can be resolved by a model
where high diversity in molecular expression is largely compensated for at the
cellular level.One of the most surprising results from our study was the degree to which
the immune profiles of parents were more similar to one another than to unrelated
pairs. This suggests that a shared environment acts in some way to bring
immunoprofiles towards a convergent equilibria. Within the environment shared by
parents, there is a panoply of plausible biological mechanisms. For example, an
individual’s microbiome converges with those that they live with 32, even including their dogs 33. Individuals in a relationship, rather than
just co-habiting, have a more similar microbiome 34, possibly via direct transmission 35, which would make the microbial convergence even stronger for
parents. Within our study design, this shared environment also includes a shared
vector (the child), the significance of which requires further investigation. Beyond
the bacterial components of the microbiome, close proximity allows the transmission
of viral pathogens, including CMV, which was found to influence twin concordance in
more than half of their immune traits 3. A
shared environment, including, presumably, socio-economic status, will also bring
shared behaviours, a process called spousal concordance: diet (which can also
influence gut microbiome 36), smoking 37, alcohol intake 38, exercise levels and even control of chronic diseases like
hypertension 39 are all likely to be
influenced by a partner’s attitudes towards them. It is fascinating to
speculate that partner choice may also influence response to immunity and immune
pathologies. Finally, we also note, but decline to comment further, that this
“parenthood effect” is a far stronger influence on the immune system
than acute and untreated gastroenteritis.
On-line Methods
Participant selection and ethical approval
All participants were Caucasian in origin and all sampling was conducted
in Belgium, except for the vaccination cohort, who were Caucasian and sampled in
England. All individuals, or their legal guardians, gave written informed
consent and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University
Hospitals Leuven. The influenza vaccination study protocol was approved by the
Health Research Authority, National Research Ethics Service committee South
Central, Hampshire A, UK (REC reference:14/SC/1077). Demographic and clinical
data were collected through a questionnaire. Exclusion criteria were cancer,
autoimmunity or gastrointestinal complaints. Individuals that were parents of
the same child were considered to be cohabiting. Individuals from the travel
clinic planning a trip to developing countries in South America, Africa or Asia
were considered to be at elevated risk of gastrointestinal infection. Acute
gastroenteritis was defined as self-reported diarrhoea (passage of unformed
stools), with or without additional symptoms of nausea, vomiting, abdominal
cramps, pain, fever or blood in stools (using ROME-III criteria).
Gasteroenteritis was classified as mild if no additional symptoms were reported,
moderate with at least one additional symptom and classic with at least three
diarrhoeal episodes per day and at least one additional symptom. Anxiety and
depression was assessing using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15). For recruitment to the
vaccination study potential participants were excluded if they have already
received the 2014-2015 seasonal influenza vaccination, if they have had a
previous adverse reaction to any vaccination, a known allergy to any components
of the vaccine, were taking immune modulating medication, and women who are
pregnant or breastfeeding. In total 32 healthy donors between 53 and 64 years of
age were recruited from the Cambridge BioResource as part of the vaccination
study during the 2014-2015 winter. Participants were administered the
inactivated influenza vaccine (split virion) BP vaccine (Sanofi Pasteur) by
intramuscular injection in the right deltoid.
Blood sampling and peripheral blood mononuclear cell isolation
Blood samples from Belgian participants were collected in Heparin tubes
and rested at 22°C for four hours prior to separation of serum and
peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) using lymphocyte separation medium
(LSM, MP Biomedicals). PBMCs were frozen in 10% DMSO (Dimethyl sulfoxide, Sigma)
and stored at -80°C for a maximum of 10 weeks. For the vaccination
cohort, research nurses at the Cambridge BioResource collected blood samples
into EDTA coated tubes on the day of vaccination (prior to administration of the
vaccine), seven days and 42 days following vaccination. PBMC were isolated using
15mL of Histopaque-1077 (Sigma) then frozen in Foetal Bovine Serum supplemented
with 10% Dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma) overnight at -80°C, then stored in
the liquid nitrogen freezer prior to analysis by flow cytometry.
Flow cytometry phenotyping
Thawed cells were stained with antibodies as listed in Supplementary Table 3.
Ki67 and Foxp3 staining was performed following treatment with
fixation/permeabilization buffer (eBioscience). Cytokine staining was performed
following ex vivo stimulation for five hours in 50 ng/ml PMA
(Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, Sigma) and 500 ng/ml ionomycin (Sigma) in the
presence of GolgiStop (BD Biosciences). Stimulated cells were surface stained,
fixed and permeabilized with Cytofix/cytoperm (BD), prior to staining for
cytokines. Additional cells were stimulated for 72 h for supernatant assessment
by MSD (see below). Data was acquired on a BD FACSCantoII and analyzed with
FlowJo (Tree star). The vaccination cohort data was acquired on a BD LSRFORTESSA
and analysed using FlowJo (Tree star).
Serological assessment
Plasma samples collected were stored at -80°C. Circulating levels
of MBL were quantified in plasma using the MBL Oligomer ELISA Kit form
Bioporto® (Copenhagen, Denmark). Circulating levels of BAFF were measured
using a human BAFF Quantikine ELISA (R&D Systems). Cytokine plasma
concentrations were quantified by an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay format
using the V-Plex™ human Pro-inflammatory panel MSD (Meso Scale Discovery.
Rockville, Maryland, USA) plates. All reagents and standards were provided by
each manufacturer. Samples and standards were prepared according to each
manufacturer’s instructions.
Data handling
Data (phenotypic, flow cytometric and serological) were collated and
stored in Microsoft Excel. All data analysis was performed using R (http://www.r-project.org version 3.1.0 40) via the RStudio IDE (http://www.rstudio.com
version 0.98.1102). Figures were drawn using knitr 41, which produces pdf output via LaTeX.ELISA and MSD data were pre-processed as follows: Any experimental value
lower than the lower limit of detection for the assay was replaced with the
lower limit of detection of that cytokine. After this step, all ELISA and MSD
data were log10 transformed. The flow cytometry data was used as
percentage as exported from FlowJo. No data was excluded from analysis.
Inter-quartile range, median, number of missing values for each immune parameter
(flow cytometry derived and serologically derived parameters together) are shown
in Supplementary Table
2. For non-longitudinal analyses only the most recent sampling of
each individual was used. The original data (phenotypic, flow cytometric and
serological) is available to download as an xls or an RData file.
Statistical analysis
All sample collection, data acquisition and data processing was
performed blind prior to statistical analysis. Spearman’s rank
correlation coefficient was used throughout for pairwise correlation
comparisons. Euclidean distances were calculated from correlation matrices
(using Spearman) as pre-processing for multi-dimensional scaling (using either
cmdscale in base R, or monoMDS from the vegan package 42) or hierarchical clustering (using heatmap in stats
package 40). Consensus clustering was
performed using the R package ConsensusClusterPlus, an R implementation of the
original algorithm 43. Correlation plots
were drawn using the plotcorr function in the ellipse package 44. Linear regression modelling was
performed using base R function (lm), with the proportions of
R calculated with the relaimpo package
45. Lm will provide differing
statistical models depending upon the input data. For most of the modelling
shown, a continuous variable (immune parameter) is modelled using a categorical
variable (such as subject identifier, visit number). In this scenario, lm
provides an ANOVA model. If both variables are continuous, linear regression
modelling is used. Two group comparisons were made using two-tailed Mann-Whitney
tests, except for the paired vaccination data, where a paired t-test was used to
compare samples from the same individual at different time points. Bonferroni
correction was used for all corrections for multiple testing, as implemented in
base R.
Code availability
Original datasets are provided as both .xls and .RData files, split into
the Belgian profiling cohort and the English vaccination cohort. The code used
to produce our figures is provided as both a pdf (for easier reading) or as an R
markdown file (for easier re-running or evaluation).
Authors: David Furman; Boris P Hejblum; Noah Simon; Vladimir Jojic; Cornelia L Dekker; Rodolphe Thiébaut; Robert J Tibshirani; Mark M Davis Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-12-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: A Amadori; R Zamarchi; G De Silvestro; G Forza; G Cavatton; G A Danieli; M Clementi; L Chieco-Bianchi Journal: Nat Med Date: 1995-12 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Petter Brodin; Vladimir Jojic; Tianxiang Gao; Sanchita Bhattacharya; Cesar J Lopez Angel; David Furman; Shai Shen-Orr; Cornelia L Dekker; Gary E Swan; Atul J Butte; Holden T Maecker; Mark M Davis Journal: Cell Date: 2015-01-15 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Mara McAdams DeMarco; Josef Coresh; Mark Woodward; Kenneth R Butler; W H Linda Kao; Thomas H Mosley; Michelle Hindin; Cheryl A M Anderson Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-08-12 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: John S Tsang; Pamela L Schwartzberg; Yuri Kotliarov; Angelique Biancotto; Zhi Xie; Ronald N Germain; Ena Wang; Matthew J Olnes; Manikandan Narayanan; Hana Golding; Susan Moir; Howard B Dickler; Shira Perl; Foo Cheung Journal: Cell Date: 2014-04-10 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Zicheng Hu; Chethan Jujjavarapu; Jacob J Hughey; Sandra Andorf; Hao-Chih Lee; Pier Federico Gherardini; Matthew H Spitzer; Cristel G Thomas; John Campbell; Patrick Dunn; Jeff Wiser; Brian A Kidd; Joel T Dudley; Garry P Nolan; Sanchita Bhattacharya; Atul J Butte Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2018-07-31 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: D Franckaert; R Collin; J Dooley; R H Wallis; P Poussier; A Liston; E E Hillhouse; S Lesage Journal: Genes Immun Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 2.676
Authors: Allison R Greenplate; Daniel D McClanahan; Brian K Oberholtzer; Deon B Doxie; Caroline E Roe; Kirsten E Diggins; Nalin Leelatian; Megan L Rasmussen; Mark C Kelley; Vivian Gama; Peter J Siska; Jeffrey C Rathmell; P Brent Ferrell; Douglas B Johnson; Jonathan M Irish Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2018-11-09 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: Kevin J Kaczorowski; Karthik Shekhar; Dieudonné Nkulikiyimfura; Cornelia L Dekker; Holden Maecker; Mark M Davis; Arup K Chakraborty; Petter Brodin Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-07-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: G Elias; A Souquette; S Heynderickx; I De Meester; H Jansens; P Beutels; P Van Damme; E Smits; P G Thomas; V Van Tendeloo; B Ogunjimi Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2018-09-19 Impact factor: 4.330