Literature DB >> 26878076

An unsupervised MVA method to compare specific regions in human breast tumor tissue samples using ToF-SIMS.

Blake M Bluestein1, Fionnuala Morrish2, Daniel J Graham1, Jamie Guenthoer2, David Hockenbery2, Peggy L Porter2, Lara J Gamble1.   

Abstract

Imaging time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) and principal component analysis (PCA) were used to investigate two sets of pre- and post-chemotherapy human breast tumor tissue sections to characterize lipids associated with tumor metabolic flexibility and response to treatment. The micron spatial resolution imaging capability of ToF-SIMS provides a powerful approach to attain spatially-resolved molecular and cellular data from cancerous tissues not available with conventional imaging techniques. Three ca. 1 mm(2) areas per tissue section were analyzed by stitching together 200 μm × 200 μm raster area scans. A method to isolate and analyze specific tissue regions of interest by utilizing PCA of ToF-SIMS images is presented, which allowed separation of cellularized areas from stromal areas. These PCA-generated regions of interest were then used as masks to reconstruct representative spectra from specifically stromal or cellular regions. The advantage of this unsupervised selection method is a reduction in scatter in the spectral PCA results when compared to analyzing all tissue areas or analyzing areas highlighted by a pathologist. Utilizing this method, stromal and cellular regions of breast tissue biopsies taken pre- versus post-chemotherapy demonstrate chemical separation using negatively-charged ion species. In this sample set, the cellular regions were predominantly all cancer cells. Fatty acids (i.e. palmitic, oleic, and stearic), monoacylglycerols, diacylglycerols and vitamin E profiles were distinctively different between the pre- and post-therapy tissues. These results validate a new unsupervised method to isolate and interpret biochemically distinct regions in cancer tissues using imaging ToF-SIMS data. In addition, the method developed here can provide a framework to compare a variety of tissue samples using imaging ToF-SIMS, especially where there is section-to-section variability that makes it difficult to use a serial hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained section to direct the SIMS analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26878076      PMCID: PMC4783233          DOI: 10.1039/c5an02406d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Analyst        ISSN: 0003-2654            Impact factor:   4.616


  55 in total

1.  Systematic analysis of breast cancer morphology uncovers stromal features associated with survival.

Authors:  Andrew H Beck; Ankur R Sangoi; Samuel Leung; Robert J Marinelli; Torsten O Nielsen; Marc J van de Vijver; Robert B West; Matt van de Rijn; Daphne Koller
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Lipid analysis of eight human breast cancer cell lines with ToF-SIMS.

Authors:  Michael A Robinson; Daniel J Graham; Fionnuala Morrish; David Hockenbery; Lara J Gamble
Journal:  Biointerphases       Date:  2015-06-28       Impact factor: 2.456

3.  Desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry: Imaging drugs and metabolites in tissues.

Authors:  Justin M Wiseman; Demian R Ifa; Yongxin Zhu; Candice B Kissinger; Nicholas E Manicke; Peter T Kissinger; R Graham Cooks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Free radicals and antioxidants in chemotherapy-induced toxicity.

Authors:  N I Weijl; F J Cleton; S Osanto
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 12.111

5.  Lipid detection, identification, and imaging single cells with SIMS.

Authors:  Michael L Heien; Paul D Piehowski; Nicholas Winograd; Andrew G Ewing
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2010

6.  Lipid imaging by gold cluster time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry: application to Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  David Touboul; Alain Brunelle; Frédéric Halgand; Sabine De La Porte; Olivier Laprévote
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2005-04-16       Impact factor: 5.922

7.  Lipidomic analysis of phospholipids from human mammary epithelial and breast cancer cell lines.

Authors:  M Luísa Dória; Cândida Z Cotrim; Cláudia Simões; Bárbara Macedo; Pedro Domingues; M Rosário Domingues; Luisa A Helguero
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 8.  Microenvironmental regulation of metastasis.

Authors:  Johanna A Joyce; Jeffrey W Pollard
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 9.  Antioxidants and cancer therapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elena J Ladas; Judith S Jacobson; Deborah D Kennedy; Katherine Teel; Aaron Fleischauer; Kara M Kelly
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Molecular imaging of proteins in tissues by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Erin H Seeley; Richard M Caprioli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Unsupervised machine learning for exploratory data analysis in imaging mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Nico Verbeeck; Richard M Caprioli; Raf Van de Plas
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 10.946

Review 2.  Mass spectrometry imaging to detect lipid biomarkers and disease signatures in cancer.

Authors:  Matthias Holzlechner; Eliseo Eugenin; Brendan Prideaux
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-12

3.  Investigation of Inter- and Intratumoral Heterogeneity of Glioblastoma Using TOF-SIMS.

Authors:  Samvel K Gularyan; Alexander A Gulin; Ksenia S Anufrieva; Victoria O Shender; Michail I Shakhparonov; Soniya Bastola; Nadezhda V Antipova; Tatiana F Kovalenko; Yury P Rubtsov; Yaroslav A Latyshev; Alexander A Potapov; Marat S Pavlyukov
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Validation of Breast Cancer Margins by Tissue Spray Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Vitaliy V Chagovets; Natalia L Starodubtseva; Alisa O Tokareva; Vladimir E Frankevich; Valerii V Rodionov; Vlada V Kometova; Konstantin Chingin; Eugene N Kukaev; Huanwen Chen; Gennady T Sukhikh
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Successive High-Resolution (H2O)n-GCIB and C60-SIMS Imaging Integrates Multi-Omics in Different Cell Types in Breast Cancer Tissue.

Authors:  Hua Tian; Louis J Sparvero; Tamil Selvan Anthonymuthu; Wan-Yang Sun; Andrew A Amoscato; Rong-Rong He; Hülya Bayır; Valerian E Kagan; Nicholas Winograd
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 6.  Biomedical surface analysis: Evolution and future directions (Review).

Authors:  David G Castner
Journal:  Biointerphases       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.456

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.