Literature DB >> 26877909

A Boosting Algorithm for Estimating Generalized Propensity Scores with Continuous Treatments.

Yeying Zhu1, Donna L Coffman2, Debashis Ghosh3.   

Abstract

In this article, we study the causal inference problem with a continuous treatment variable using propensity score-based methods. For a continuous treatment, the generalized propensity score is defined as the conditional density of the treatment-level given covariates (confounders). The dose-response function is then estimated by inverse probability weighting, where the weights are calculated from the estimated propensity scores. When the dimension of the covariates is large, the traditional nonparametric density estimation suffers from the curse of dimensionality. Some researchers have suggested a two-step estimation procedure by first modeling the mean function. In this study, we suggest a boosting algorithm to estimate the mean function of the treatment given covariates. In boosting, an important tuning parameter is the number of trees to be generated, which essentially determines the trade-off between bias and variance of the causal estimator. We propose a criterion called average absolute correlation coefficient (AACC) to determine the optimal number of trees. Simulation results show that the proposed approach performs better than a simple linear approximation or L2 boosting. The proposed methodology is also illustrated through the Early Dieting in Girls study, which examines the influence of mothers' overall weight concern on daughters' dieting behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  boosting; distance correlation; dose–response function; generalized propensity scores; high dimensional

Year:  2014        PMID: 26877909      PMCID: PMC4749263          DOI: 10.1515/jci-2014-0022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Causal Inference        ISSN: 2193-3685


  13 in total

1.  Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study.

Authors:  Jared K Lunceford; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies.

Authors:  Daniel F McCaffrey; Greg Ridgeway; Andrew R Morral
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2004-12

3.  On the use of discrete choice models for causal inference.

Authors:  Rusty Tchernis; Marcela Horvitz-Lennon; Sharon-Lise T Normand
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Comment: Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data.

Authors:  Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.901

5.  Dieting and unhealthy weight control behaviors during adolescence: associations with 10-year changes in body mass index.

Authors:  Dianne Neumark-Sztainer; Melanie Wall; Mary Story; Amber R Standish
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 5.012

6.  An information criterion for marginal structural models.

Authors:  Robert W Platt; M Alan Brookhart; Stephen R Cole; Daniel Westreich; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Mothers' child-feeding practices influence daughters' eating and weight.

Authors:  L L Birch; J O Fisher
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research.

Authors:  Valerie S Harder; Elizabeth A Stuart; James C Anthony
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2010-09

9.  Average causal effects from nonrandomized studies: a practical guide and simulated example.

Authors:  Joseph L Schafer; Joseph Kang
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2008-12

10.  Eating in the absence of hunger and overweight in girls from 5 to 7 y of age.

Authors:  Jennifer Orlet Fisher; Leann L Birch
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.045

View more
  20 in total

1.  Comment.

Authors:  Min Qian
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  A Kernel-Based Metric for Balance Assessment.

Authors:  Yeying Zhu; Jennifer S Savage; Debashis Ghosh
Journal:  J Causal Inference       Date:  2018-05-18

3.  Propensity score weighting for a continuous exposure with multilevel data.

Authors:  Megan S Schuler; Wanghuan Chu; Donna Coffman
Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol       Date:  2016-08-25

4.  Personalized Dose Finding Using Outcome Weighted Learning.

Authors:  Guanhua Chen; Donglin Zeng; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  Nonparametric Estimation of Population Average Dose-Response Curves using Entropy Balancing Weights for Continuous Exposures.

Authors:  Brian G Vegetabile; Beth Ann Griffin; Donna L Coffman; Matthew Cefalu; Michael W Robbins; Daniel F McCaffrey
Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol       Date:  2021-02-13

6.  Estimating controlled direct effects of restrictivefeeding practices in the 'Early dieting in girls' study.

Authors:  Yeying Zhu; Debashis Ghosh; Donna L Coffman; Jennifer S Savage
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2015-06-28       Impact factor: 1.864

7.  Landmark estimation of survival and treatment effects in observational studies.

Authors:  Layla Parast; Beth Ann Griffin
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  A machine learning compatible method for ordinal propensity score stratification and matching.

Authors:  Thomas J Greene; Stacia M DeSantis; Derek W Brown; Anna V Wilkinson; Michael D Swartz
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Propensity score stratification methods for continuous treatments.

Authors:  Derek W Brown; Thomas J Greene; Michael D Swartz; Anna V Wilkinson; Stacia M DeSantis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Adolescent Substance Use Prevention: Long-Term Benefits of School Engagement.

Authors:  Hyanghee Lee; Kimberly L Henry
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 2.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.