Literature DB >> 33352615

A machine learning compatible method for ordinal propensity score stratification and matching.

Thomas J Greene1, Stacia M DeSantis2, Derek W Brown3,4, Anna V Wilkinson5, Michael D Swartz2.   

Abstract

Although machine learning techniques that estimate propensity scores for observational studies with multivalued treatments have advanced rapidly in recent years, the development of propensity score adjustment techniques has not kept pace. While machine learning propensity models provide numerous benefits, they do not produce a single variable balancing score that can be used for propensity score stratification and matching. This issue motivates the development of a flexible ordinal propensity scoring methodology that does not require parametric assumptions for the propensity model. The proposed method fits a one-parameter power function to the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the generalized propensity score (GPS) vector resulting from any machine learning propensity model, and is henceforth called the GPS-CDF method. The estimated parameter from the GPS-CDF method, ã , is a scalar balancing score that can be used to group similar subjects in outcome analyses. Specifically, subjects who received different levels of the treatment are stratified or matched based on their ã value to produce unbiased estimates of the average treatment effect (ATE). Simulation studies presented show remediation of covariate balance, minimal bias in ATEs, and maintain coverage probability. The proposed method is applied to the Mexican-American Tobacco use in Children (MATCh) study to determine whether an ordinal treatment of exposure to smoking imagery in movies causes cigarette experimentation in Mexican-American adolescents.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  causal inference; observational data; ordinal treatment; smoking experimentation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33352615      PMCID: PMC8919399          DOI: 10.1002/sim.8846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  49 in total

Review 1.  Invited commentary: propensity scores.

Authors:  M M Joffe; P R Rosenbaum
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Type I error rates, coverage of confidence intervals, and variance estimation in propensity-score matched analyses.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 0.968

3.  Variable selection for propensity score models.

Authors:  M Alan Brookhart; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Kenneth J Rothman; Robert J Glynn; Jerry Avorn; Til Stürmer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Paul Grootendorst; Geoffrey M Anderson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Matching by propensity score in cohort studies with three treatment groups.

Authors:  Jeremy A Rassen; Abhi A Shelat; Jessica M Franklin; Robert J Glynn; Daniel H Solomon; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Propensity score matching and subclassification in observational studies with multi-level treatments.

Authors:  Shu Yang; Guido W Imbens; Zhanglin Cui; Douglas E Faries; Zbigniew Kadziola
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea.

Authors:  Patrick Royston; Douglas G Altman; Willi Sauerbrei
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  A Tutorial and Case Study in Propensity Score Analysis: An Application to Estimating the Effect of In-Hospital Smoking Cessation Counseling on Mortality.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Correlates of susceptibility to smoking among Mexican origin youth residing in Houston, Texas: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Anna V Wilkinson; Andrew J Waters; Vandita Vasudevan; Melissa L Bondy; Alexander V Prokhorov; Margaret R Spitz
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  1 in total

1.  Propensity score stratification methods for continuous treatments.

Authors:  Derek W Brown; Thomas J Greene; Michael D Swartz; Anna V Wilkinson; Stacia M DeSantis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 2.373

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.