Bülent Cengiz1, H Evren Boran2. 1. Motor Control Laboratory, The Clinical Neurophysiology Division of the Department of Neurology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address: bcengiz@gazi.edu.tr. 2. Motor Control Laboratory, The Clinical Neurophysiology Division of the Department of Neurology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Although it is well documented that the cerebellum plays a role in motor imagery (MI), its exact role in MI is still obscure. Since motor imagery and execution of movement share common pathways, and the cerebellum has an inhibitory effect on the motor cortex, we speculated that the cerebellum also has an inhibitory role on MI. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, 12 healthy individuals aged 27-47 years (mean age 33.3 years) were enrolled in the study. Subjects were asked to imagine two different tasks, one complex (MI-c) and one simple (MI-s) motor task. The intensity of anodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) was set at 2 mA for 20 min. Sham ctDCS consisted of 30s current stimulation. RESULTS: MI-s resulted in significantly increased log MEP amplitude during MI, compared with control MEP amplitude,(p=0.000). The increase in log MEP amplitude during MI disappeared after anodal ctDCS. Before sham ctDCS, both MI-s and MI-c resulted in log MEP amplitude increases (p=0.000). This facilitator effect of both MI-c and MI-s on log MEP amplitude was also persistent after sham ctDCS (p=0.000). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates for the first time that the cerebellum has an inhibitory effect on MI. SIGNIFICANCE: Combining ctDCS with MI significantly modulates corticomotor excitability.
OBJECTIVE: Although it is well documented that the cerebellum plays a role in motor imagery (MI), its exact role in MI is still obscure. Since motor imagery and execution of movement share common pathways, and the cerebellum has an inhibitory effect on the motor cortex, we speculated that the cerebellum also has an inhibitory role on MI. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, 12 healthy individuals aged 27-47 years (mean age 33.3 years) were enrolled in the study. Subjects were asked to imagine two different tasks, one complex (MI-c) and one simple (MI-s) motor task. The intensity of anodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) was set at 2 mA for 20 min. Sham ctDCS consisted of 30s current stimulation. RESULTS:MI-s resulted in significantly increased log MEP amplitude during MI, compared with control MEP amplitude,(p=0.000). The increase in log MEP amplitude during MI disappeared after anodal ctDCS. Before sham ctDCS, both MI-s and MI-c resulted in log MEP amplitude increases (p=0.000). This facilitator effect of both MI-c and MI-s on log MEP amplitude was also persistent after sham ctDCS (p=0.000). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates for the first time that the cerebellum has an inhibitory effect on MI. SIGNIFICANCE: Combining ctDCS with MI significantly modulates corticomotor excitability.
Authors: Yanna Tong; John T Pendy; William A Li; Huishan Du; Tong Zhang; Xiaokun Geng; Yuchuan Ding Journal: Aging Dis Date: 2017-05-02 Impact factor: 6.745
Authors: Maria de la Soledad Rodriguez-Ugarte; Eduardo Iáñez; Mario Ortiz-Garcia; José M Azorín Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2018-04-08 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: John G Samuelsson; Padmavathi Sundaram; Sheraz Khan; Martin I Sereno; Matti S Hämäläinen Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 5.038