Literature DB >> 26874797

Response of human macrophages to wound matrices in vitro.

Claire E Witherel1, Pamela L Graney1, Donald O Freytes2,3,4, Michael S Weingarten5, Kara L Spiller1.   

Abstract

Chronic wounds remain a major burden to the global healthcare system. Myriad wound matrices are commercially available but their mechanisms of action are poorly understood. Recent studies have shown that macrophages are highly influenced by their microenvironment, but it is not known how different biomaterials affect this interaction. Here, it was hypothesized that human macrophages respond differently to changes in biomaterial properties in vitro with respect to phenotype, including pro-inflammatory M1, anti-inflammatory M2a, known for facilitating extracellular matrix deposition and proliferation, and M2c, which has recently been associated with tissue remodeling. Using multiple donors, it was found that collagen scaffolds cross-linked with 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide and N-hydroxysuccinimide (EDC/NHS) promoted the least inflammatory phenotype in primary human macrophages compared with scaffolds cross-linked with formaldehyde or glutaraldehyde. Importantly, gene expression analysis trends were largely conserved between donors, especially TNFa (M1), CCL22 (M2a), and MRC1 (M2a). Then the response of primary and THP1 monocyte-derived macrophages to four commercially available wound matrices were compared-Integra Dermal Regeneration Template (Integra), PriMatrix Dermal Repair Scaffold (PriMatrix), AlloMend Acellular Dermal Matrix (AlloMend), and Oasis Wound Matrix (Oasis). Gene expression trends were different between primary and THP1 monocyte-derived macrophages for all six genes analyzed in this study. Finally, the behavior of primary macrophages cultured onto the wound matrices over time was analyzed. Integra and Oasis caused down-regulation of M2a markers CCL22 and TIMP3. PriMatrix caused up-regulation of TNFa (M1) and CD163 (M2c) and down-regulation of CCL22 and TIMP3 (both M2a). AlloMend caused up-regulation in CD163 (M2c). Lastly, Oasis promoted the largest increase in the combinatorial M1/M2 score, defined as the sum of M1 genes divided by the sum of M2 genes. This preliminary study suggested that biomaterials influenced the wound microenvironment to affect macrophage phenotype.
© 2016 by the Wound Healing Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26874797     DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  27 in total

1.  Characterizing the Macrophage Response to Immunomodulatory Biomaterials Through Gene Set Analyses.

Authors:  Sarah E Blatt; Emily B Lurier; Gregory E Risser; Kara L Spiller
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 2.  Extracellular Matrix-Based Strategies for Immunomodulatory Biomaterials Engineering.

Authors:  Andrew T Rowley; Raji R Nagalla; Szu-Wen Wang; Wendy F Liu
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 3.  Regenerative Scar-Free Skin Wound Healing.

Authors:  Mehri Monavarian; Safaa Kader; Seyedsina Moeinzadeh; Esmaiel Jabbari
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 6.389

4.  Reply to: Observation on the article "Long-term follow-up comparison of two different bilayer dermal substitutes in tissue regeneration: Clinical outcomes and histological findings".

Authors:  Barbara De Angelis; Pietro Gentile
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Transcriptome analysis of IL-10-stimulated (M2c) macrophages by next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Emily B Lurier; Donald Dalton; Will Dampier; Pichai Raman; Sina Nassiri; Nicole M Ferraro; Ramakrishan Rajagopalan; Mahdi Sarmady; Kara L Spiller
Journal:  Immunobiology       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 3.144

6.  Modulation of macrophage phenotype via phagocytosis of drug-loaded microparticles.

Authors:  Kathryn L Wofford; D Kacy Cullen; Kara L Spiller
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 4.396

7.  In vitro response of macrophages to ceramic scaffolds used for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Pamela L Graney; Seyed-Iman Roohani-Esfahani; Hala Zreiqat; Kara L Spiller
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Temporal and spatial distribution of macrophage phenotype markers in the foreign body response to glutaraldehyde-crosslinked gelatin hydrogels.

Authors:  Tony Yu; Wenbo Wang; Sina Nassiri; Thomas Kwan; Chau Dang; Wei Liu; Kara L Spiller
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.517

9.  Anti-inflammatory effects of octadecylamine-functionalized nanodiamond on primary human macrophages.

Authors:  A E Pentecost; C E Witherel; Y Gogotsi; K L Spiller
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 6.843

10.  Incorporation of the Amniotic Membrane as an Immunomodulatory Design Element in Collagen Scaffolds for Tendon Repair.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hortensius; Jill H Ebens; Marley J Dewey; Brendan A C Harley
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2018-10-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.