Literature DB >> 26874597

ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations thresholds for adopting real-time imaging-assisted endoscopic targeted biopsy during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus.

Nirav Thosani, Barham K Abu Dayyeh, Prateek Sharma, Harry R Aslanian, Brintha K Enestvedt, Sri Komanduri, Michael Manfredi, Udayakumar Navaneethan, John T Maple, Rahul Pannala, Mansour A Parsi, Zachary L Smith, Shelby A Sullivan, Subhas Banerjee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic real-time imaging of Barrett's esophagus (BE) with advanced imaging technologies enables targeted biopsies and may eliminate the need for random biopsies to detect dysplasia during endoscopic surveillance of BE. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Technology Committee to specifically assess whether acceptable performance thresholds outlined by the ASGE Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations (PIVI) document for clinical adoption of these technologies have been met.
METHODS: We conducted meta-analyses calculating the pooled sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), and specificity for chromoendoscopy by using acetic acid and methylene blue, electronic chromoendoscopy by using narrow-band imaging, and confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) for the detection of dysplasia. Random effects meta-analysis models were used. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated by means of I(2) statistics.
RESULTS: The pooled sensitivity, NPV, and specificity for acetic acid chromoendoscopy were 96.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95-98), 98.3% (95% CI, 94.8-99.4), and 84.6% (95% CI, 68.5-93.2), respectively. The pooled sensitivity, NPV, and specificity for electronic chromoendoscopy by using narrow-band imaging were 94.2% (95% CI, 82.6-98.2), 97.5% (95% CI, 95.1-98.7), and 94.4% (95% CI, 80.5-98.6), respectively. The pooled sensitivity, NPV, and specificity for endoscope-based CLE were 90.4% (95% CI, 71.9-97.2), 98.3% (95% CI, 94.2-99.5), and 92.7% (95% CI, 87-96), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis indicates that targeted biopsies with acetic acid chromoendoscopy, electronic chromoendoscopy by using narrow-band imaging, and endoscope-based CLE meet the thresholds set by the ASGE PIVI, at least when performed by endoscopists with expertise in advanced imaging techniques. The ASGE Technology Committee therefore endorses using these advanced imaging modalities to guide targeted biopsies for the detection of dysplasia during surveillance of patients with previously nondysplastic BE, thereby replacing the currently used random biopsy protocols.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26874597     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  54 in total

Review 1.  Barrett's esophagus: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Swathi Eluri; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Evaluation of Dysplasia in Barrett Esophagus.

Authors:  Seth A Gross; Joseph Kingsbery; Janice Jang; Michelle Lee; Abraham Khan
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2018-04

Review 3.  Barrett's esophagus: best practices for treatment and post-treatment surveillance.

Authors:  Nabil M Mansour; Hashem B El-Serag; Sharmila Anandasabapathy
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-03

Review 4.  Early Esophageal Cancer: A Gastroenterologist's Disease.

Authors:  Joseph Spataro; Alvin M Zfass; Mitchell Schubert; Tilak Shah
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Shining a White Light on Barrett's Esophagus: What Does the BING Classification Bring?

Authors:  Shajan Peter
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  Natural History of the Post-ablation Esophagus.

Authors:  Craig C Reed; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Point-Counterpoint: Screening and Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus, Is It Worthwhile?

Authors:  Fouad Otaki; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 8.  Recent Advances in Non-invasive Esophageal Tissue Sampling.

Authors:  David A Katzka
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2017-03

Review 9.  Durability of Endoscopic Treatment for Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Craig C Reed; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-06

10.  Usefulness of Non-magnifying Narrow Band Imaging in EVIS EXERA III Video Systems and High-Definition Endoscopes to Diagnose Dysplasia in Barrett's Esophagus Using the Barrett International NBI Group (BING) Classification.

Authors:  Oscar Nogales; Arancha Caballero-Marcos; Ana Clemente-Sánchez; Javier García-Lledó; Leticia Pérez-Carazo; Beatriz Merino; Carlos Carbonell; María López-Ibáñez; Cecilia González-Asanza
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.