Literature DB >> 26873225

Clinical evaluation of the effect of diquafosol ophthalmic solution in glaucoma patients with dry eye syndrome.

Sang Wook Jin1, Ji Sang Min2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of diquafosol on intraocular pressure (IOP) and dry eye symptoms in glaucoma patients with dry eye syndrome (DES).
METHODS: This study evaluated a total of 138 glaucoma patients with DES who were treated with diquafosol ophthalmic solution (DIQUAS(®)). Before treatment and 1, 4, 12, 36, and 52 weeks after treatment, IOP, ocular surface disease index (OSDI), tear film break-up time (BUT), Schirmer I test scores, fluorescein staining, conjunctival impression cytology, and adverse drug reactions were evaluated.
RESULTS: Throughout the treatment period, the mean IOP for all the patients remained stable after treatment with diquafosol (15.4 ± 2.8 mmHg at baseline and 16.0 ± 2.8 mmHg at 52 weeks). The mean OSDI score improved significantly at 4, 12, and 52 weeks after diquafosol treatment. The BUT and Schirmer I test scores were significantly increased after diquafosol treatment. The Oxford scheme score was significantly decreased at 1, 4, 12, 36, and 52 weeks after diquafosol treatment. A significant improvement in goblet cell density was observed after 4 weeks of treatment with diquafosol. Adverse drug reactions were reported in 22 (15.9 %) patients. There were no serious adverse drug reactions.
CONCLUSIONS: Diquafosol was effective in improving objective and subjective symptoms and maintained a stable IOP in glaucoma patients with DES. Therefore, the addition of diquafosol treatment in glaucoma patients with DES or ocular surface side effects using anti-glaucoma medication may be beneficial.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DIQUAS; Diquafosol; Dry eye; Glaucoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26873225     DOI: 10.1007/s10384-016-0430-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0021-5155            Impact factor:   2.447


  26 in total

1.  Rabbit conjunctival epithelium transports fluid, and P2Y2(2) receptor agonists stimulate Cl(-) and fluid secretion.

Authors:  Y Li; K Kuang; B Yerxa; Q Wen; H Rosskothen; J Fischbarg
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.249

2.  Focus on molecules: purinergic P2Y(2) receptor.

Authors:  Ana Guzman-Aranguez; Jesús Pintor
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 3.467

3.  Dysfunctional tear syndrome: a Delphi approach to treatment recommendations.

Authors:  Ashley Behrens; John J Doyle; Lee Stern; Roy S Chuck; Peter J McDonnell; Dimitri T Azar; Harminder S Dua; Milton Hom; Paul M Karpecki; Peter R Laibson; Michael A Lemp; David M Meisler; Juan Murube Del Castillo; Terrence P O'Brien; Stephen C Pflugfelder; Maurizio Rolando; Oliver D Schein; Berthold Seitz; Scheffer C Tseng; Gysbert van Setten; Steven E Wilson; Samuel C Yiu
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Goblet cell numbers and epithelial proliferation in the conjunctiva of patients with dry eye syndrome treated with cyclosporine.

Authors:  Kathleen S Kunert; Ann S Tisdale; Ilene K Gipson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-03

5.  INS365 suppresses loss of corneal epithelial integrity by secretion of mucin-like glycoprotein in a rabbit short-term dry eye model.

Authors:  Tsutomu Fujihara; Tadahiro Murakami; Takashi Nagano; Masatsugu Nakamura; Katsuhiko Nakata
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.671

6.  Presence of diadenosine polyphosphates in the aqueous humor: their effect on intraocular pressure.

Authors:  Jesús Pintor; Assumpta Peral; Teresa Peláez; Silvia Martín; Charles H V Hoyle
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Minimal clinically important difference for the ocular surface disease index.

Authors:  Kimberly L Miller; John G Walt; David R Mink; Sacha Satram-Hoang; Steven E Wilson; Henry D Perry; Penny A Asbell; Stephen C Pflugfelder
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-01

8.  Age changes in rhesus monkey ciliary muscle: light and electron microscopy.

Authors:  E Lütjen-Drecoll; E Tamm; P L Kaufman
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.467

9.  Ocular symptoms and signs with preserved and preservative-free glaucoma medications.

Authors:  N Jaenen; C Baudouin; P Pouliquen; G Manni; A Figueiredo; T Zeyen
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.597

10.  A randomised, double-masked comparison study of diquafosol versus sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solutions in dry eye patients.

Authors:  Etsuko Takamura; Kazuo Tsubota; Hitoshi Watanabe; Yuichi Ohashi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effect of diquafosol tetrasodium 3% on the conjunctival surface and clinical findings after cataract surgery in patients with dry eye.

Authors:  Lian Cui; Ying Li; Hyo Seok Lee; Jee Myung Yang; Won Choi; Kyung Chul Yoon
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Intense pulsed light-based treatment for the improvement of symptoms in glaucoma patients treated with hypotensive eye drops.

Authors:  Jose Maria Martinez-de-la-Casa; Carlos Oribio-Quinto; Almudena Milans-Del-Bosch; Pilar Perez-Garcia; Laura Morales-Fernandez; Javier Garcia-Bella; Jose Manuel Benitez-Del-Castillo; Julian Garcia-Feijoo; David P Piñero
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2022-04-01

Review 3.  A Narrative Review of Ocular Surface Disease Related to Anti-Glaucomatous Medications.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Zhou; Xinyue Zhang; Dengming Zhou; Yang Zhao; Xuanchu Duan
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-08-09

4.  The protective effect of 3% diquafosol on meibomian gland morphology in glaucoma patients treated with prostaglandin analogs: a 12-month follow-up study.

Authors:  Yue Guo; Jun Young Ha; He Long Piao; Mi Sun Sung; Sang Woo Park
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.209

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.