PURPOSE: To develop current treatment recommendations for dry eye disease from consensus of expert advice. METHODS: Of 25 preselected international specialists on dry eye, 17 agreed to participate in a modified, 2-round Delphi panel approach. Based on available literature and standards of care, a survey was presented to each panelist. A two-thirds majority was used for consensus building from responses obtained. Treatment algorithms were created. Treatment recommendations for different types and severity levels of dry eye disease were the main outcome. RESULTS: A new term for dry eye disease was proposed: dysfunctional tear syndrome (DTS). Treatment recommendations were based primarily on patient symptoms and signs. Available diagnostic tests were considered of secondary importance in guiding therapy. Development of algorithms was based on the presence or absence of lid margin disease and disturbances of tear distribution and clearance. Disease severity was considered the most important factor for treatment decision-making and was categorized into 4 levels. Severity was assessed on the basis of tear substitute requirements, symptoms of ocular discomfort, and visual disturbance. Clinical signs present in lids, tear film, conjunctiva, and cornea were also used for categorization of severity. Consensus was reached on treatment algorithms for DTS with and without concurrent lid disease. CONCLUSION: Panelist opinion relied on symptoms and signs (not tests) for selection of treatment strategies. Therapy is chosen to match disease severity and presence versus absence of lid margin disease or tear distribution and clearance disturbances.
PURPOSE: To develop current treatment recommendations for dry eye disease from consensus of expert advice. METHODS: Of 25 preselected international specialists on dry eye, 17 agreed to participate in a modified, 2-round Delphi panel approach. Based on available literature and standards of care, a survey was presented to each panelist. A two-thirds majority was used for consensus building from responses obtained. Treatment algorithms were created. Treatment recommendations for different types and severity levels of dry eye disease were the main outcome. RESULTS: A new term for dry eye disease was proposed: dysfunctional tear syndrome (DTS). Treatment recommendations were based primarily on patient symptoms and signs. Available diagnostic tests were considered of secondary importance in guiding therapy. Development of algorithms was based on the presence or absence of lid margin disease and disturbances of tear distribution and clearance. Disease severity was considered the most important factor for treatment decision-making and was categorized into 4 levels. Severity was assessed on the basis of tear substitute requirements, symptoms of ocular discomfort, and visual disturbance. Clinical signs present in lids, tear film, conjunctiva, and cornea were also used for categorization of severity. Consensus was reached on treatment algorithms for DTS with and without concurrent lid disease. CONCLUSION: Panelist opinion relied on symptoms and signs (not tests) for selection of treatment strategies. Therapy is chosen to match disease severity and presence versus absence of lid margin disease or tear distribution and clearance disturbances.
Authors: Geraint P Williams; Annette Pachnio; Heather M Long; Saaeha Rauz; S John Curnow Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Niral B Gandhi; Zhitao Su; Xiaobo Zhang; Eugene A Volpe; Flavia S A Pelegrino; Salman A Rahman; De-Quan Li; Stephen C Pflugfelder; Cintia S de Paiva Journal: J Leukoc Biol Date: 2013-08-27 Impact factor: 4.962
Authors: Alan Tomlinson; Anthony J Bron; Donald R Korb; Shiro Amano; Jerry R Paugh; E Ian Pearce; Richard Yee; Norihiko Yokoi; Reiko Arita; Murat Dogru Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-03-30 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Rohan Bir Singh; Ann Yung; Giulia Coco; Shruti Sinha; Thomas H Dohlman; Jia Yin; Reza Dana Journal: Ocul Surf Date: 2020-07-30 Impact factor: 5.033
Authors: Helene Lam; Lauren Bleiden; Cintia S de Paiva; William Farley; Michael E Stern; Stephen C Pflugfelder Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2008-11-07 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Amalia Enríquez-de-Salamanca; Evangelina Castellanos; Michael E Stern; Itziar Fernández; Ester Carreño; Carmen García-Vázquez; Jose M Herreras; Margarita Calonge Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2010-05-19 Impact factor: 2.367
Authors: Ki Cheol Chang; Joo Youn Oh; Youn Seok In; Mee Kum Kim; Ki Cheul Shin; Won Ryang Wee; Jin Hak Lee; Myung Gyu Park Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2009-07-30 Impact factor: 2.153