Literature DB >> 26872851

Role of contralesional hemisphere in paretic arm reaching in patients with severe arm paresis due to stroke: A preliminary report.

Sambit Mohapatra1, Rachael Harrington2, Evan Chan3, Alexander W Dromerick4, Erika Y Breceda5, Michelle Harris-Love6.   

Abstract

Stroke is highly prevalent and a leading cause of serious, long-term disability among American adults. Impaired movement (i.e. paresis) of the stroke-affected arm is a major contributor to post-stroke disability, yet the mechanisms of upper extremity motor recovery are poorly understood, particularly in severely impaired patients who lack hand function. To address this problem, we examined the functional relevance of the contralesional hemisphere in paretic arm motor performance in individuals with severe arm paresis. Twelve individuals with severe stroke-induced arm paresis (Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment=17.1 ± 8.5; maximum score=66) participated in the study. Participants performed a reaching response time task with their paretic arm. At varying time intervals following a 'Go' cue, a pair of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses were delivered to contralesional hemisphere primary motor (M1) or dorsal pre-motor cortex (PMd) to momentarily disrupt the pattern of neural firing. Response time components and hand-path characteristics were compared across the 2 sites for trials with and without TMS disruption. There was no significant effect of TMS disruption on overall Response time or Reaction time, but Movement time was significantly longer (i.e. slower) with disruption of the contralesional hemisphere (p=0.015), regardless of which area was stimulated. Peak hand-path velocity and hand-path smoothness were also significantly lower (p=0.005 and p<0.0001, respectively) with TMS disruption of the contralesional hemisphere. The data from this study provide evidence supporting a functionally relevant role of contralesional hemisphere motor areas in paretic arm reaching movements in individuals with severe post-stroke arm impairment.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Paresis; Reaching; Stroke; TMS

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26872851     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  18 in total

1.  Stratifying chronic stroke patients based on the influence of contralesional motor cortices: An inter-hemispheric inhibition study.

Authors:  Yin-Liang Lin; Kelsey A Potter-Baker; David A Cunningham; Manshi Li; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; John Lee; Stephen Jones; Ken Sakaie; Xiaofeng Wang; Andre G Machado; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Type-2 diabetes mellitus reduces cortical thickness and decreases oxidative metabolism in sensorimotor regions after stroke.

Authors:  Jennifer K Ferris; Sue Peters; Katlyn E Brown; Katherine Tourigny; Lara A Boyd
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 6.200

3.  Inhibition versus facilitation of contralesional motor cortices in stroke: Deriving a model to tailor brain stimulation.

Authors:  Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Andre G Machado; Adriana B Conforto; Kelsey A Potter-Baker; David A Cunningham; Nicole M Varnerin; Xiaofeng Wang; Ken Sakaie; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 4.  Motor compensation and its effects on neural reorganization after stroke.

Authors:  Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 5.  Spontaneous and Therapeutic-Induced Mechanisms of Functional Recovery After Stroke.

Authors:  Jessica M Cassidy; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 6.829

6.  Ipsilateral primary motor cortex and behavioral compensation after stroke: a case series study.

Authors:  Ali Bani-Ahmed; Carmen M Cirstea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Roles of Lesioned and Nonlesioned Hemispheres in Reaching Performance Poststroke.

Authors:  Rachael M Harrington; Evan Chan; Amanda K Rounds; Clinton J Wutzke; Alexander W Dromerick; Peter E Turkeltaub; Michelle L Harris-Love
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Motor skill changes and neurophysiologic adaptation to recovery-oriented virtual rehabilitation of hand function in a person with subacute stroke: a case study.

Authors:  Gerard G Fluet; Jigna Patel; Qinyin Qiu; Matthew Yarossi; Supriya Massood; Sergei V Adamovich; Eugene Tunik; Alma S Merians
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.033

9.  Using theoretical models from adult stroke recovery to improve use of noninvasive brain stimulation for children with congenital hemiparesis.

Authors:  Yin-Liang Lin; Kelsey A Potter-Baker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Neurophysiological Changes Induced by Music-Supported Therapy for Recovering Upper Extremity Function after Stroke: A Case Series.

Authors:  Shashank Ghai; Fabien Dal Maso; Tatiana Ogourtsova; Alba-Xifra Porxas; Myriam Villeneuve; Virginia Penhune; Marie-Hélène Boudrias; Sylvain Baillet; Anouk Lamontagne
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.