Literature DB >> 26871375

Virtual and stereoscopic anatomy: when virtual reality meets medical education.

Jose Weber Vieira de Faria1, Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira2, Leonardo de Moura Sousa Júnior3, Jose Pinhata Otoch2, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The authors sought to construct, implement, and evaluate an interactive and stereoscopic resource for teaching neuroanatomy, accessible from personal computers. METHODS Forty fresh brains (80 hemispheres) were dissected. Images of areas of interest were captured using a manual turntable and processed and stored in a 5337-image database. Pedagogic evaluation was performed in 84 graduate medical students, divided into 3 groups: 1 (conventional method), 2 (interactive nonstereoscopic), and 3 (interactive and stereoscopic). The method was evaluated through a written theory test and a lab practicum. RESULTS Groups 2 and 3 showed the highest mean scores in pedagogic evaluations and differed significantly from Group 1 (p < 0.05). Group 2 did not differ statistically from Group 3 (p > 0.05). Size effects, measured as differences in scores before and after lectures, indicate the effectiveness of the method. ANOVA results showed significant difference (p < 0.05) between groups, and the Tukey test showed statistical differences between Group 1 and the other 2 groups (p < 0.05). No statistical differences between Groups 2 and 3 were found in the practicum. However, there were significant differences when Groups 2 and 3 were compared with Group 1 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The authors conclude that this method promoted further improvement in knowledge for students and fostered significantly higher learning when compared with traditional teaching resources.

Keywords:  QT = QuickTime; QTVR = QT virtual reality; anatomy; education; medical; multimedia; neuroanatomy; teaching materials; teaching methods

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26871375     DOI: 10.3171/2015.8.JNS141563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  11 in total

1.  Stereoscopic three-dimensional visualization: interest for neuroanatomy teaching in medical school.

Authors:  Timothée Jacquesson; Emile Simon; Corentin Dauleac; Loïc Margueron; Philip Robinson; Patrick Mertens
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2020-02-29       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Operative Anatomy of the Skull Base: 3D Exploration with a Highly Detailed Interactive Atlas.

Authors:  Ralf A Kockro; Eike Schwandt; Florian Ringel; Christian Valentin Eisenring; Wieslaw Lucjan Nowinski
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-06-03

3.  A hybrid simulation model for pre-operative planning of transsphenoidal encephalocele.

Authors:  Giselle Coelho; Nicollas Nunes Rabelo; Eduardo Varjão; Thailane Marie; Daniella Brito; Emilio C Del Massa; Henrique Zuppani; Belmiro Matos; Maurício Yoshida; João Paulo Mota Telles; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Effects of Virtual Reality training on medical students' learning motivation and competency.

Authors:  Mian Usman Sattar; Sellappan Palaniappan; Asiah Lokman; Atif Hassan; Nauman Shah; Zurabia Riaz
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.088

Review 5.  Does three-dimensional anatomy improve student understanding?

Authors:  Charlotte P R Triepels; Carlijn F A Smeets; Kim J B Notten; Roy F P M Kruitwagen; Jurgen J Futterer; Tineke F M Vergeldt; Sander M J Van Kuijk
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 2.414

6.  Impact of virtual reality anatomy training on ultrasound competency development: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kai-Chun Hu; Daniel Salcedo; Yi-No Kang; Che-Wei Lin; Chin-Wang Hsu; Chung-Yi Cheng; Fat-Moon Suk; Wen-Cheng Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Methodological and institutional considerations for the use of 360-degree video and pet animals in human subject research: An experimental case study from the United States.

Authors:  Martin Swobodzinski; Mika Maruyama; Eric Mankowski
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-06

8.  The effectiveness of virtual reality-based technology on anatomy teaching: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

Authors:  Jingjie Zhao; Xinliang Xu; Hualin Jiang; Yi Ding
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Virtual reality technology for teaching neurosurgery of skull base tumor.

Authors:  Xuefei Shao; Quan Yuan; Daqing Qian; Zheng Ye; Gao Chen; Kang le Zhuang; Xiaochun Jiang; Yuelong Jin; Di Qiang
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Stereoscopic three-dimensional visualisation technology in anatomy learning: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katerina Bogomolova; Beerend P Hierck; Agnes E M Looijen; Johanne N M Pilon; Hein Putter; Bruce Wainman; Steven E R Hovius; Jos A van der Hage
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 6.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.