| Literature DB >> 26870608 |
Nagaraju Indugu1, Kyle Bittinger2, Sanjay Kumar1, Bonnie Vecchiarelli1, Dipti Pitta1.
Abstract
Next generation sequencing (NGS) technology is a widely accepted tool used by microbial ecologists to explore complex microbial communities in different ecosystems. As new NGS platforms continue to become available, it becomes imperative to compare data obtained from different platforms and analyze their effect on microbial community structure. In the present study, we compared sequencing data from both the 454 and Ion Torrent (PGM) platforms on the same DNA samples obtained from the rumen of dairy cows during their transition period. Despite the substantial difference in the number of reads, error rate and length of reads among both platforms, we identified similar community composition between the two data sets. Procrustes analysis revealed similar correlations (M (2) = 0.319; P = 0.001) in the microbial community composition between the two platforms. Both platforms revealed the abundance of the same bacterial phyla which were Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes; however, PGM recovered an additional four phyla. Comparisons made at the genus level by each platforms revealed differences in only a few genera such as Prevotella, Ruminococcus, Succiniclasticum and Treponema (p < 0.05; chi square test). Collectively, we conclude that the output generated from PGM and 454 yielded concurrent results, provided stringent bioinformatics pipelines are employed.Entities:
Keywords: Dairy cows; Next generation sequencing; Rumen microbiome; Transition period
Year: 2016 PMID: 26870608 PMCID: PMC4748696 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1599
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Bacteria phyla during pre-calving (S1) and post-calving (S2) in Primiparous (Pp) and multiparous (Mp) dairy cows, as retrieved by the Roche 454 (A) and Ion Torrent (B) platforms.
Mean sample proportion of bacterial phyla by study group (Pp, primiparous and Mp, multiparous) and study day (S1, 3 weeks prior to calving; S2, 1–3 days after calving) in Roche 454 and Ion Torrent samples.
| Phylum | Platform | Study group (SG) | Study day (SD) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pp | Mp | S1 | S2 | |||||
| Bacteroidetes | Roche 454 | 0.8450 | 0.7700 | 0.7640 | 0.8400 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.7613 | 0.7032 | 0.6940 | 0.7610 | ||||
| Cyanobacteria | Roche 454 | 0.0040 | 0.0030 | 0.0060 | 0.0020 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0069 | 0.0050 | 0.0077 | 0.0047 | ||||
| Fibrobacteres | Roche 454 | 0.0110 | 0.0150 | 0.0140 | 0.0110 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0082 | 0.0115 | 0.0086 | 0.0108 | ||||
| Firmicutes | Roche 454 | 0.0800 | 0.1060 | 0.1200 | 0.0730 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.1164 | 0.1420 | 0.1492 | 0.1142 | ||||
| Proteobacteria | Roche 454 | 0.0080 | 0.0200 | 0.0150 | 0.0140 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0096 | 0.0097 | 0.0105 | 0.0090 | ||||
| Spirochaetes | Roche 454 | 0.0010 | 0.0040 | 0.0030 | 0.0020 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0035 | 0.0073 | 0.0067 | 0.0044 | ||||
| Tenericutes | Roche 454 | 0.0050 | 0.0110 | 0.0120 | 0.0050 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0094 | 0.0109 | 0.0136 | 0.0076 | ||||
| TM7 | Roche 454 | 0.0030 | 0.0050 | 0.0050 | 0.0040 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0050 | 0.0089 | 0.0093 | 0.0052 | ||||
Notes.
The magnitude of the p-values for the effect of study group (PSG), study day (PSD), and the interaction term (PSG∗SD) are shown on the right.
P < 0.001.
P < 0.01.
P < 0.05.
Mean sample proportion of bacterial genera by study group (Pp, primiparous and Mp, pluriparous) and study day (S1, 3 weeks prior to calving; S2, 1–3 days after calving) in 454 and Ion torrent samples.
| Taxon | Platform | Study group (SG) | Study day (SD) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pp | Mp | S1 | S2 | |||||
| Paraprevotellaceae | Roche 454 | 0.0040 | 0.0080 | 0.0040 | 0.0070 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0070 | 0.0070 | 0.0070 | 0.0070 | ||||
| Bacteroidales | Roche 454 | 0.0420 | 0.0720 | 0.0620 | 0.0540 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0430 | 0.0630 | 0.0560 | 0.0500 | ||||
| BF311 | Roche 454 | ND | ND | ND | ND | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0020 | 0.0040 | 0.0040 | 0.0020 | ||||
| CF231 | Roche 454 | 0.0130 | 0.0180 | 0.0150 | 0.0150 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0160 | 0.0170 | 0.0150 | 0.0170 | ||||
| Prevotella | Roche 454 | 0.7200 | 0.5680 | 0.5820 | 0.6900 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.6280 | 0.5270 | 0.5250 | 0.6170 | ||||
| Prevotellaceae | Roche 454 | 0.0040 | 0.0060 | 0.0030 | 0.0070 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0040 | 0.0050 | 0.0040 | 0.0040 | ||||
| RF16 | Roche 454 | 0.0350 | 0.0430 | 0.0610 | 0.0230 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0360 | 0.0420 | 0.0520 | 0.0290 | ||||
| S24-7 | Roche 454 | 0.0150 | 0.0360 | 0.0140 | 0.0340 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0120 | 0.0190 | 0.0090 | 0.0200 | ||||
| YRC22 | Roche 454 | 0.0100 | 0.0100 | 0.0130 | 0.0080 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0110 | 0.0110 | 0.0110 | 0.0110 | ||||
| Mogibacteriaceae | Roche 454 | ND | ND | ND | ND | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0020 | 0.0030 | 0.0030 | 0.0020 | ||||
| Butyrivibrio | Roche 454 | 0.0040 | 0.0020 | 0.0030 | 0.0030 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0070 | 0.0050 | 0.0060 | 0.0050 | ||||
| Clostridiales | Roche 454 | 0.0240 | 0.0290 | 0.0370 | 0.0180 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0330 | 0.0380 | 0.0460 | 0.0270 | ||||
| Coprococcus | Roche 454 | 0.0020 | 0.0020 | 0.0030 | 0.0020 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0060 | 0.0030 | 0.0040 | 0.0050 | ||||
| Lachnospiraceae | Roche 454 | 0.0130 | 0.0140 | 0.0150 | 0.0120 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0210 | 0.0190 | 0.0230 | 0.0180 | ||||
| RFN20 | Roche 454 | 0.0040 | 0.0150 | 0.0130 | 0.0060 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0040 | 0.0150 | 0.0110 | 0.0090 | ||||
| Ruminococcaceae | Roche 454 | 0.0060 | 0.0120 | 0.0140 | 0.0060 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0080 | 0.0210 | 0.0170 | 0.0120 | ||||
| Ruminococcus | Roche 454 | 0.0040 | 0.0080 | 0.0070 | 0.0050 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0100 | 0.0110 | 0.0110 | 0.0100 | ||||
| Selenomonas | Roche 454 | ND | ND | ND | ND | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0030 | 0.0020 | 0.0010 | 0.0040 | ||||
| Succiniclasticum | Roche 454 | 0.0110 | 0.0070 | 0.0130 | 0.0060 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0100 | 0.0070 | 0.0110 | 0.0070 | ||||
| Veillonellaceae | Roche 454 | 0.0020 | 0.0020 | 0.0010 | 0.0030 | |||
| Ion Torrent | 0.0030 | 0.0040 | 0.0030 | 0.0040 | ||||
Notes.
ND, Not Detected; The magnitude of the p-values for the effect of study group (PSG), study day (PSD), and the interaction term (PSG∗SD) are shown on the right.
P < 0.001.
P < 0.01.
P < 0.05.
Figure 4Proportion of Prevotella among all Bacteroidetes in the rumen samples collected during the pre-calving (S1) and post-calving (S2) in both Primiparous (Pp) and multiparous (Mp) dairy cows, as retrieved by the Roche 454 (A) and Ion Torrent (B) platforms.
Figure 2Alpha diversity of samples sequenced on the Roche 454 and Ion Torrent platforms.
The rarefaction curves show the mean value for number of OTUs observed and Shanonn diversity at various sequencing depths.
Figure 3Procrustes analysis of Roche 454 and Ion Torrent samples.
This analysis compares the principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of UniFrac distance between samples for each platform, showing the best superimposition of one plot on the other. Samples in Roche 454 (orange circle) and Ion Torrent (green circle) are connected by a line. The blue line indicates Roche 454 samples and the red line indicates Ion Torrent samples. A lower distance between the circles indicates a higher degree of concordance between the plots.