Literature DB >> 26869364

Consenting postpartum women for use of routinely collected biospecimens and/or future biospecimen collection.

Claudia A Kozinetz1, Kathryn Royse2, Sarah C Graham3, Xiaoying Yu2, Jack Moye4, Beatrice J Selwyn5, Michele R Forman6, Chantal Caviness3.   

Abstract

The National Children's Study (NCS) Harris County, Texas Study Center participated in the NCS Provider Based Sampling (PBS) substudy of the NCS Vanguard Phase pilot. As part of the hospital-based birth cohort component of the PBS substudy, we conducted a secondary data analysis to evaluate the proportion of postpartum women who consented to future biospecimen collection alone and to both future collection and use of residual birth biospecimens. In phase 1, 32 postpartum women at one hospital were asked to consent only to maternal future biospecimen collection. In phase 2, 40 other postpartum women from the same hospital were asked for an additional consent to use residual clinical biospecimens from the birth event that otherwise would be discarded, including cord blood and maternal blood and urine. Among 103 eligible women, a total of 72 participated. They were 28.3 ± 5.9 years old on average; 58 % were Hispanic; 63 % consented in English, and 37 % in Spanish; 39 % had some college education; 42 % were married; 60 % had an annual family income <$30,000; and 51 % were employed. In phase 1, 59 % consented to future biospecimen collection, and in phase 2, 95 % consented to both future collection and use of at least one residual birth biospecimen, with a difference between phases of 36 % [95 % CI 17-54 %]. Demographic characteristics did not differ among those who did and did not consent. Postpartum women were significantly more likely to grant consent for use of future and residual hospital-obtained biospecimens than future biospecimen collection alone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biospecimen; Consent; Postpartum; Residual

Year:  2016        PMID: 26869364      PMCID: PMC4796041          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-016-0261-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  16 in total

1.  Turning residual human biological materials into research collections: playing with consent.

Authors:  Eugenijus Gefenas; Vilius Dranseika; Jurate Serepkaite; Asta Cekanauskaite; Luciana Caenazzo; Bert Gordijn; Renzo Pegoraro; Elizabeth Yuko
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  The ethics of research using biobanks: reason to question the importance attributed to informed consent.

Authors:  Klaus Hoeyer; Bert-Ove Olofsson; Tom Mjörndal; Niels Lynöe
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-01-10

3.  Native Hawaiian preferences for informed consent and disclosure of results from research using stored biological specimens.

Authors:  Megan Fong; Kathryn L Braun; R Mei-Ling Chang
Journal:  Pac Health Dialog       Date:  2004-09

4.  Ownership and use of tissue specimens for research.

Authors:  Rina Hakimian; David Korn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The National Children's Study: a 21-year prospective study of 100,000 American children.

Authors:  Philip J Landrigan; Leonardo Trasande; Lorna E Thorpe; Charon Gwynn; Paul J Lioy; Mary E D'Alton; Heather S Lipkind; James Swanson; Pathik D Wadhwa; Edward B Clark; Virginia A Rauh; Frederica P Perera; Ezra Susser
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Alaska native people's perceptions, understandings, and expectations for research involving biological specimens.

Authors:  Vanessa Y Hiratsuka; Jennifer K Brown; Theresa J Hoeft; Denise A Dillard
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 1.228

7.  Challenges in creating an opt-in biobank with a registrar-based consent process and a commercial EHR.

Authors:  Keith Marsolo; Jeremy Corsmo; Michael G Barnes; Carrie Pollick; Jamie Chalfin; Jeremy Nix; Christopher Smith; Rajesh Ganta
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Biobanking research on oncological residual material: a framework between the rights of the individual and the interest of society.

Authors:  Luciana Caenazzo; Pamela Tozzo; Renzo Pegoraro
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  A trial of consent procedures for future research with clinically derived biological samples.

Authors:  E Vermeulen; M K Schmidt; N K Aaronson; M Kuenen; M-J Baas-Vrancken Peeters; H van der Poel; S Horenblas; H Boot; V J Verwaal; A Cats; F E van Leeuwen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Consent for the use of human biological samples for biomedical research: a mixed methods study exploring the UK public's preferences.

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Margaret Clotworthy; Shona Hilton; Caroline Magee; Mark J Robertson; Lesley J Stubbins; Julie Corfield
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  2 in total

1.  Willingness of women to participate in obstetrical and pediatric research involving biobanks.

Authors:  Renate D Savich; Beth B Tigges; Lisbeth Iglesias Rios; Joanne McCloskey; Kristine Tollestrup; Robert D Annett
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-11-28

2.  The National Children's Study Archive Model: A 3-Tier Framework for Dissemination of Data and Specimens for General Use and Secondary Analysis.

Authors:  Peter K Gilbertson; Susan Forrester; Linda Andrews; Kathleen McCann; Lydia Rogers; Christina Park; Jack Moye
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-03-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.