| Literature DB >> 26868756 |
Juthamard Limkul1, Sayoko Iizuka2, Yohei Sato2, Ryo Misaki1, Takao Ohashi1, Toya Ohashi2, Kazuhito Fujiyama1.
Abstract
For the production of therapeutic proteins in plants, the presence of β1Entities:
Keywords: N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase I; Nicotiana benthamiana; glyco-engineered plant; human glucocerebrosidase; plant-made pharmaceuticals
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26868756 PMCID: PMC5067671 DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12529
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Biotechnol J ISSN: 1467-7644 Impact factor: 9.803
Figure 3T 2 generation of cross‐pollinated GNTI‐RNAi and At‐GC‐HSP19 ( GC ) plants. Total soluble protein (1 μg) was loaded in each lane on 10% SDS‐PAGE gel and then analysed by immunoblotting using (a) anti‐GC antibody or (b) anti‐HRP antibody. (c) Silver staining serves as the loading control.
Figure 1Generation of GNTI suppression in plants. (a) Schematic representation of a construct used to generate GNTI suppression in plants. 35Sp and 35St represent sequences of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter and terminator sequences, respectively. Antisense and sense sequences were derived from a coding mRNA sequence of β‐1,2‐N‐acetylglucosaminyltransferase. (b–c) Protein extracts were separated by 10% SDS‐PAGE and detected by immunoblotting using an antihorseradish peroxidase (anti‐HRP) antibody specific for plant complex‐type N‐glycans. (b) The GNTI‐RNAi transgenic lines 7, 8, 10, 11 and 12 referred to an independent GNTI suppression transgenic line of T 2 generation plants. WT, wild‐type plant; cgl, plant. (c) The seven independent transgenic plants of GNTI‐RNAi7 (T 6 generation) and two independent WT plants (WT1 and WT2) were analysed with anti‐HRP. Silver (S.) staining serves as the loading control.
Figure 2Glycan profiles of WT and GNTI‐RNAi7 (T 5 generation). Total N‐glycans from glycoproteins were prepared by hydrazinolysis and labelled with 2‐aminopyridine (PA). PA‐labelled glycans were analysed by RP‐HPLC using a C 18 column. All peaks (indicated by a broken line) were then subjected to LC–MS/MS. The glycan structures identified from deconvoluted MS/MS spectra are indicated in the box. The M5 structure of GNTI‐RNAi7 eluted earlier (indicated by a broken line box) are not included in the calculation.
Composition of sugar chain structures of WT and GNTI‐RNAi7
| Abbreviation | Structure | Relative amount (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WT |
| ||
| M2XF | Man2XylFucGlcNAc2 | 4.3 | – |
| M3X | Man3XylGlcNAc2 | 6.4 | – |
| M3XF | Man3XylFucGlcNAc2 | 48.2 | 1.2 |
| GNM3X | GlcNAcMan3XylGlcNAc2 | 3.6 | – |
| GNM3XF | GlcNAcMan3XylFucGlcNAc2 | 7.8 | 2.7 |
| GN2M3XF | GlcNAc2Man3XylFucGlcNAc2 | 19.0 | 5.2 |
|
|
|
| |
| M5 | Man5GlcNAc2 | 4.8 | 82.4 |
| M6 | Man6GlcNAc2 | 2.4 | – |
| M7 | Man7GlcNAc2 | – | 4.1 |
| M8 | Man8GlcNAc2 | 3.5 | 4.4 |
|
|
|
| |
Figure 4Glycan characterization of purified GC produced in WT (GC WT) and GNTI suppression (GC ) plants. The purified GC WT and GC were analysed on 5%–20% SDS‐PAGE gel and (a) stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (1 μg), and also analysed by immunoblot (100 ng) using (b) anti‐GC antibody or (c) anti‐HRP antibody. (a–b) Equal amounts of purified GC WT and GC were analysed while (c) the purified GC showed a smaller amount of plant complex N‐glycans compared with GC WT. (d) One hundred ng of each sample was digested in the absence (−) or presence (+) of either EndoH f or PNGase F and analysed on 7.5% SDS‐PAGE gel. The GC bands were visualized by immunoblotting.
Figure 5Nano LC–MS spectra of tryptic glycopeptides derived from purified GC WT and GC . The purified GC WT and GC were excised from a gel, trypsinized and then subjected to nano LC–MS/MS. (a) The elution pattern of tryptic peptide derived from Cerezyme®, GC WT and GC on nano HPLC. The glycan structures were identified from deconvoluted MS/MS spectra. (b–e) show the glycoforms of glycopeptides with N‐glycosylation sites N19, N59, N146 and N270, respectively.
Composition of sugar chain structures attached on GC WT and GC
| Abbreviation | Structure | N19 (S8‐R39) | N59 (R48‐K74) | N146 (T132‐K155) | N270 (D263‐R277) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCWT | GC | GCWT | GC | GCWT | GC | GCWT | GC | ||
| Relative amount (%) | |||||||||
| M2X | Man2XylGlcNAc2 | – | – | – | – | 2.7 | – | – | – |
| M2F | Man2FucGlcNAc2 | 5.7 | – | – | – | – | – | 6.7 | 2.7 |
| M2XF | Man2XylFucGlcNAc2 | 20.0 | – | 11.3 | 3.4 | 16.5 | – | 23.9 | 0.7 |
| M3X | Man3XylGlcNAc2 | 6.3 | 2.5 | 1.8 | – | 5.5 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 0.9 |
| M3F | Man3FucGlcNAc2 | – | 2.5 | 4.0 | – | 4.6 | 2.5 | 9.2 | 2.7 |
| M3XF | Man3XylFucGlcNAc2 | 68.1 | 20.6 | 56.1 | 11.1 | 65.5 | 18.6 | 43.5 | 9.1 |
| GNM3XF | GlcNAcMan3XylFucGlcNAc2 | – | 1.1 | 19.5 | – | 5.2 | – | 10.0 | 1.9 |
| GN2M3XF | GlcNAc2Man3XylFucGlcNAc2 | – | – | 7.2 | – | – | – | 5.2 | – |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| M2 | Man2GlcNAc2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.3 |
| M3 | Man3GlcNAc2 | – | 3.2 | – | 5.1 | – | – | – | 8.3 |
| M4 | Man4GlcNAc2 | – | 6.9 | – | 18.0 | – | 3.5 | – | 23.9 |
| M5 | Man5GlcNAc2 | – | 63.2 | – | 62.5 | – | 73.0 | – | 48.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Figure 6Uptake of GC WT or GC by macrophages via mannose receptors. The macrophage cells were stained with the macrophage marker CD11b. Unstained cells (negative control, grey) and macrophages (black) were analysed by flow cytometry (a). The effect of mannan on the specific uptake of GC WT and GC was determined (b), and the cellular activities of GC WT and GC were compared (c). The cellular activities of GC WT, GC and Cerezyme® were compared (d). The results and error bars represent the mean ± SE (n = 3), significantly different at the level of **P < 0.05; *P = 0.05.
Figure 7Uptake of GC WT or GC into the organs of C57BL/6J mice. The distribution to the liver, spleen, kidney and lungs of mice was evaluated by enzymatic activity at 60 min postinjection. The results and error bars represent the mean ± SE (n = 3 mice).