Literature DB >> 26867974

Nurses' role in medical error recovery: an integrative review.

Theresa A Gaffney1, Barbara J Hatcher1, Renee Milligan1.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to conduct an integrative review of the literature to fully understand nurses' role in medical error recovery.
BACKGROUND: Despite focused efforts on error prevention, the prevalence of medical errors occurring in the health care system remains a concern. Patient harm can be reduced or prevented by adequate recovery processes that include identifying, interrupting and correcting medical errors in a timely fashion. Both medical error prevention and recovery are critical components in advancing patient safety, yet little is known about nurses' role in medical error recovery.
DESIGN: An integrative review of the literature, guided by Whittmore and Knafl's (Journal of Advanced Nursing, 5, 2005, 546) five-step process, was conducted for the period between 2000-2015. A comprehensive search yielded twelve articles for this review.
METHODS: The level and quality of evidence of the included articles was rated using a five-level rating system and the Johns Hopkins Nursing Quality of Evidence Appraisal developed by ©The Johns Hopkins Hospital/The Johns Hopkins University.
RESULTS: The medical error recovery rate varied across specialty nursing populations with nurses recovering, on average, as many as one error per shift to as few as one error per week. Nurses rely on knowing the patient, environment and plan of care to aid in medical error recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: Nurses play a unique yet invisible role in identifying, interrupting and recovering medical errors. Individual and organisational factors influencing nurses' ability to recover medical errors remain unclear. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Greater understanding of nurse characteristics and organisational factors that influence error recovery can foster the development of effective strategies to detect and correct medical errors and enable organisations to reduce negative outcomes.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  medical errors; near miss; nurses; patient safety; recovery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26867974     DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  6 in total

Review 1.  Nurse workarounds in the electronic health record: An integrative review.

Authors:  Dan Fraczkowski; Jeffrey Matson; Karen Dunn Lopez
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Medication incident recovery and prevention utilising an Australian community pharmacy incident reporting system: the QUMwatch study.

Authors:  Khaled Adie; Romano A Fois; Andrew J McLachlan; Timothy F Chen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Patient involvement for improved patient safety: A qualitative study of nurses' perceptions and experiences.

Authors:  Janna Skagerström; Carin Ericsson; Per Nilsen; Mirjam Ekstedt; Kristina Schildmeijer
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2017-08-29

4.  Medication-related incidents at 19 hospitals: A retrospective register study using incident reports.

Authors:  Maria Cottell; Inger Wätterbjörk; Maria Hälleberg Nyman
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2020-05-31

Review 5.  Nurses' Adherence to Patient Safety Principles: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mojtaba Vaismoradi; Susanna Tella; Patricia A Logan; Jayden Khakurel; Flores Vizcaya-Moreno
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Can we add another C to the 6Cs: C for Clever?

Authors:  Parveen Ali
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2019-12-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.