Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 The Nursing Home Compare Report Card: Perceptions of Residents and Caregivers Regarding Quality Ratings and Nursing Home Choice.

Literature DB >> 26867949

The Nursing Home Compare Report Card: Perceptions of Residents and Caregivers Regarding Quality Ratings and Nursing Home Choice.

Marilyn M Schapira^1,2, Judy A Shea^1,3, Katia A Duey¹, Carly Kleiman¹, Rachel M Werner^1,2,3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perceived usefulness of publicly reported nursing home quality indicators. STUDY
SETTING: Primary data were collected from October 2013 to August 2014 among a convenience sample of persons (or family member) recently admitted or anticipating admission to a nursing home within 75 miles of the city of Philadelphia. STUDY
DESIGN: Structured interviews were conducted to assess the salience of data on the Medicare Nursing Home Compare website, including star ratings, clinical quality measures, and benchmarking of individual nursing home quality with state and national data. DATA COLLECTION: Interviews were transcribed verbatim, independently coded by two reviewers, and agreement determined. A thematic analysis of transcripts was undertaken. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Thirty-five interviews were completed. Eighty-three percent (n = 29) were caregivers and 17 percent (n = 6) were residents. Star ratings, clinical quality measures, and benchmarking information were salient to decision making, with preferred formats varying across participants. Participants desired additional information on the source of quality data. Confusion was evident regarding the relationship between domain-specific and overall star quality ratings.
CONCLUSIONS: The Nursing Home Compare website provides salient content and formats for consumers. Increased awareness of this resource and clarity regarding the definition of measures could further support informed decision making regarding nursing home choice. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities: Species

Keywords: Nursing home; public reporting; quality indicators

Mesh：

Year: 2016 PMID： 26867949 PMCID： PMC4874934 DOI： 10.1111/1475-6773.12458

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Serv Res ISSN： 0017-9124 Impact factor: 3.402

18 in total

1. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors: M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 1975-11 Impact factor: 4.791

2. Connections between quality measurement and improvement.

Authors: Donald M Berwick; Brent James; Molly Joel Coye
Journal: Med Care Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 2.983

3. Do consumers respond to publicly reported quality information? Evidence from nursing homes.

Authors: Rachel M Werner; Edward C Norton; R Tamara Konetzka; Daniel Polsky
Journal: J Health Econ Date: 2012-01-10 Impact factor: 3.883

4. Effect of educational level and minority status on nursing home choice after hospital discharge.

Authors: Joseph Angelelli; David C Grabowski; Vincent Mor
Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-05-30 Impact factor: 9.308

5. Consumer competencies and the use of comparative quality information: it isn't just about literacy.

Authors: Judith H Hibbard; Ellen Peters; Anna Dixon; Martin Tusler
Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 3.929

Review 6. Disparities in long-term care: building equity into market-based reforms.

Authors: R Tamara Konetzka; Rachel M Werner
Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2009-02-18 Impact factor: 3.929

7. Public reporting of hospital quality: recommendations to benefit patients and hospitals.

Authors: Michael B Rothberg; Evan M Benjamin; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 2.960

8. Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree.

Authors: Daniel Kahneman; Gary Klein
Journal: Am Psychol Date: 2009-09

9. Does information matter? Competition, quality, and the impact of nursing home report cards.

Authors: David C Grabowski; Robert J Town
Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2011-07-25 Impact factor: 3.402

10. Impact of public reporting on quality of postacute care.

Authors: Rachel M Werner; R Tamara Konetzka; Elizabeth A Stuart; Edward C Norton; Daniel Polsky; Jeongyoung Park
Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2009-03-31 Impact factor: 3.734

18 in total

1. Medicare Advantage Enrollees More Likely To Enter Lower-Quality Nursing Homes Compared To Fee-For-Service Enrollees.

Authors: David J Meyers; Vincent Mor; Momotazur Rahman
Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 6.301

2. Medicaid and Nursing Home Choice: Why Do Duals End Up in Low-Quality Facilities?

Authors: Hari Sharma; Marcelo Coca Perraillon; Rachel M Werner; David C Grabowski; R Tamara Konetzka
Journal: J Appl Gerontol Date: 2019-04-08

3. New Evidence on What Works in Effective Public Reporting.

Authors: Brent Sandmeyer; Irene Fraser
Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2016-04-27 Impact factor: 3.402

4. Patients Are Not Given Quality-Of-Care Data About Skilled Nursing Facilities When Discharged From Hospitals.

Authors: Denise A Tyler; Emily A Gadbois; John P McHugh; Renée R Shield; Ulrika Winblad; Vincent Mor
Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 6.301

5. Quality of Nursing Homes and Admission of Residents With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: The Potential Influence of Market Factors and State Policies.

Authors: Di Yan; Sijiu Wang; Helena Temkin-Greener; Shubing Cai
Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2020-06-19 Impact factor: 4.669