Literature DB >> 26866387

Meeting the Needs for Released Nanomaterials Required for Further Testing-The SUN Approach.

Bernd Nowack1, Alessio Boldrin2, Alejandro Caballero1, Steffen Foss Hansen2, Fadri Gottschalk3, Laura Heggelund2, Michael Hennig4, Aiga Mackevica2, Hanna Maes4, Jana Navratilova5, Nicole Neubauer6, Ruud Peters7, Jerome Rose8, Andreas Schäffer4, Lorette Scifo8, Stefan van van Leeuwen7, Frank von der Kammer5, Wendel Wohlleben6, Anne Wyrwoll4, Danail Hristozov9.   

Abstract

The analysis of the potential risks of engineered nanomaterials (ENM) has so far been almost exclusively focused on the pristine, as-produced particles. However, when considering a life-cycle perspective, it is clear that ENM released from genuine products during manufacturing, use, and disposal is far more relevant. Research on the release of materials from nanoproducts is growing and the next necessary step is to investigate the behavior and effects of these released materials in the environment and on humans. Therefore, sufficient amounts of released materials need to be available for further testing. In addition, ENM-free reference materials are needed since many processes not only release ENM but also nanosized fragments from the ENM-containing matrix that may interfere with further tests. The SUN consortium (Project on "Sustainable Nanotechnologies", EU seventh Framework funding) uses methods to characterize and quantify nanomaterials released from composite samples that are exposed to environmental stressors. Here we describe an approach to provide materials in hundreds of gram quantities mimicking actual released materials from coatings and polymer nanocomposites by producing what is called "fragmented products" (FP). These FP can further be exposed to environmental conditions (e.g., humidity, light) to produce "weathered fragmented products" (WFP) or can be subjected to a further size fractionation to isolate "sieved fragmented products" (SFP) that are representative for inhalation studies. In this perspective we describe the approach, and the used methods to obtain released materials in amounts large enough to be suitable for further fate and (eco)toxicity testing. We present a case study (nanoparticulate organic pigment in polypropylene) to show exemplarily the procedures used to produce the FP. We present some characterization data of the FP and discuss critically the further potential and the usefulness of the approach we developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26866387     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b04472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  7 in total

Review 1.  Nanotechnology in Transportation Vehicles: An Overview of Its Applications, Environmental, Health and Safety Concerns.

Authors:  Muhammad Shafique; Xiaowei Luo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  The Impacts of Moisture and Ultraviolet Light on the Degradation of Graphene Oxide/Polymer Nanocomposites.

Authors:  David G Goodwin; Trinny Lai; Yadong Lyu; Chen Yuan Lu; Alejandro Campos; Vytas Reipa; Tinh Nguyen; Lipiin Sung
Journal:  NanoImpact       Date:  2020

3.  Copper oxide nanoparticles trigger macrophage cell death with misfolding of Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1).

Authors:  Govind Gupta; Francesca Cappellini; Lucian Farcal; Rosalba Gornati; Giovanni Bernardini; Bengt Fadeel
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 9.112

4.  Environmental Risk Assessment Strategy for Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Janeck J Scott-Fordsmand; Willie J G M Peijnenburg; Elena Semenzin; Bernd Nowack; Neil Hunt; Danail Hristozov; Antonio Marcomini; Muhammad-Adeel Irfan; Araceli Sánchez Jiménez; Robert Landsiedel; Lang Tran; Agnes G Oomen; Peter M J Bos; Kerstin Hund-Rinke
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  In vitro detection of in vitro secondary mechanisms of genotoxicity induced by engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  Stephen J Evans; Martin J D Clift; Neenu Singh; John W Wills; Nicole Hondow; Thomas S Wilkinson; Michael J Burgum; Andy P Brown; Gareth J Jenkins; Shareen H Doak
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 9.400

6.  Risks, Release and Concentrations of Engineered Nanomaterial in the Environment.

Authors:  Bernd Giese; Fred Klaessig; Barry Park; Ralf Kaegi; Michael Steinfeldt; Henning Wigger; Arnim von Gleich; Fadri Gottschalk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  NanoRelease: Pilot interlaboratory comparison of a weathering protocol applied to resilient and labile polymers with and without embedded carbon nanotubes.

Authors:  Wendel Wohlleben; Christopher Kingston; Janet Carter; E Sahle-Demessie; Socorro Vázquez-Campos; Brad Acrey; Chia-Ying Chen; Ernest Walton; Heiko Egenolf; Philipp Müller; Richard Zepp
Journal:  Carbon N Y       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 9.594

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.