Literature DB >> 26865621

Mind the Gap: Two Dissociable Mechanisms of Temporal Processing in the Auditory System.

Lucy A Anderson1, Jennifer F Linden2.   

Abstract

High temporal acuity of auditory processing underlies perception of speech and other rapidly varying sounds. A common measure of auditory temporal acuity in humans is the threshold for detection of brief gaps in noise. Gap-detection deficits, observed in developmental disorders, are considered evidence for "sluggish" auditory processing. Here we show, in a mouse model of gap-detection deficits, that auditory brain sensitivity to brief gaps in noise can be impaired even without a general loss of central auditory temporal acuity. Extracellular recordings in three different subdivisions of the auditory thalamus in anesthetized mice revealed a stimulus-specific, subdivision-specific deficit in thalamic sensitivity to brief gaps in noise in experimental animals relative to controls. Neural responses to brief gaps in noise were reduced, but responses to other rapidly changing stimuli unaffected, in lemniscal and nonlemniscal (but not polysensory) subdivisions of the medial geniculate body. Through experiments and modeling, we demonstrate that the observed deficits in thalamic sensitivity to brief gaps in noise arise from reduced neural population activity following noise offsets, but not onsets. These results reveal dissociable sound-onset-sensitive and sound-offset-sensitive channels underlying auditory temporal processing, and suggest that gap-detection deficits can arise from specific impairment of the sound-offset-sensitive channel. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The experimental and modeling results reported here suggest a new hypothesis regarding the mechanisms of temporal processing in the auditory system. Using a mouse model of auditory temporal processing deficits, we demonstrate the existence of specific abnormalities in auditory thalamic activity following sound offsets, but not sound onsets. These results reveal dissociable sound-onset-sensitive and sound-offset-sensitive mechanisms underlying auditory processing of temporally varying sounds. Furthermore, the findings suggest that auditory temporal processing deficits, such as impairments in gap-in-noise detection, could arise from reduced brain sensitivity to sound offsets alone.
Copyright © 2016 Anderson and Linden.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory; gap detection; hearing; mouse; temporal processing; thalamus

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26865621      PMCID: PMC4748080          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1652-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  68 in total

Review 1.  On the classification of pathways in the auditory midbrain, thalamus, and cortex.

Authors:  Charles C Lee; S Murray Sherman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Responses to tones and noise of single cells in dorsal cochlear nucleus of unanesthetized cats.

Authors:  E D Young; W E Brownell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Formation of spike response to sound tones in cat auditory cortex neurons: interaction of excitatory and inhibitory effects.

Authors:  I O Volkov; A V Galazjuk
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  A circuit for motor cortical modulation of auditory cortical activity.

Authors:  Anders Nelson; David M Schneider; Jun Takatoh; Katsuyasu Sakurai; Fan Wang; Richard Mooney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Gain control mechanisms in the auditory pathway.

Authors:  Benjamin Louis Robinson; David McAlpine
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Evidence for aberrant auditory anatomy in developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  A M Galaburda; M T Menard; G D Rosen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-08-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  An opinion on the assessment of people who may have an auditory processing disorder.

Authors:  Harvey Dillon; Sharon Cameron; Helen Glyde; Wayne Wilson; Dani Tomlin
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Connections of the superior paraolivary nucleus of the rat: projections to the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  E Saldaña; M-A Aparicio; V Fuentes-Santamaría; A S Berrebi
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Spontaneous murine lupus-like syndromes. Clinical and immunopathological manifestations in several strains.

Authors:  B S Andrews; R A Eisenberg; A N Theofilopoulos; S Izui; C B Wilson; P J McConahey; E D Murphy; J B Roths; F J Dixon
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1978-11-01       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  Excitatory and inhibitory projections in parallel pathways from the inferior colliculus to the auditory thalamus.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Mellott; Nichole L Foster; Andrew P Ohl; Brett R Schofield
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.856

View more
  18 in total

1.  Spectral and spatial tuning of onset and offset response functions in auditory cortical fields A1 and CL of rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Deepa L Ramamurthy; Gregg H Recanzone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Emergence and function of cortical offset responses in sound termination detection.

Authors:  Magdalena Solyga; Tania Rinaldi Barkat
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Leveling up: a long-range olivary projection to the medial geniculate without collaterals to the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus in rats.

Authors:  Alyson Burchell; Yusra Mansour; Randy Kulesza
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Synaptic Recruitment Enhances Gap Termination Responses in Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Bshara Awwad; Maciej M Jankowski; Israel Nelken
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Phasic Off responses of auditory cortex underlie perception of sound duration.

Authors:  Haifu Li; Jian Wang; Guilong Liu; Jinfeng Xu; Weilong Huang; Changbao Song; Dijia Wang; Huizhong W Tao; Li I Zhang; Feixue Liang
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 9.423

6.  Temporal asymmetries in auditory coding and perception reflect multi-layered nonlinearities.

Authors:  Thomas Deneux; Alexandre Kempf; Aurélie Daret; Emmanuel Ponsot; Brice Bathellier
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Knockout Mice for Dyslexia Susceptibility Gene Homologs KIAA0319 and KIAA0319L have Unaffected Neuronal Migration but Display Abnormal Auditory Processing.

Authors:  Luiz G Guidi; Jane Mattley; Isabel Martinez-Garay; Anthony P Monaco; Jennifer F Linden; Antonio Velayos-Baeza; Zoltán Molnár
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Experience-Dependent Coding of Time-Dependent Frequency Trajectories by Off Responses in Secondary Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Kelly K Chong; Dakshitha B Anandakumar; Alex G Dunlap; Dorottya B Kacsoh; Robert C Liu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Slow NMDA-Mediated Excitation Accelerates Offset-Response Latencies Generated via a Post-Inhibitory Rebound Mechanism.

Authors:  Ezhilarasan Rajaram; Carina Kaltenbach; Matthew J Fischl; Leander Mrowka; Olga Alexandrova; Benedikt Grothe; Matthias H Hennig; Conny Kopp-Scheinpflug
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-06-18

10.  A Cortico-Collicular Amplification Mechanism for Gap Detection.

Authors:  Aldis P Weible; Iryna Yavorska; Michael Wehr
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.