Literature DB >> 26863276

Individual finger control of a modular prosthetic limb using high-density electrocorticography in a human subject.

Guy Hotson1, David P McMullen2, Matthew S Fifer3, Matthew S Johannes4, Kapil D Katyal4, Matthew P Para4, Robert Armiger4, William S Anderson2, Nitish V Thakor3, Brock A Wester4, Nathan E Crone5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We used native sensorimotor representations of fingers in a brain-machine interface (BMI) to achieve immediate online control of individual prosthetic fingers. APPROACH: Using high gamma responses recorded with a high-density electrocorticography (ECoG) array, we rapidly mapped the functional anatomy of cued finger movements. We used these cortical maps to select ECoG electrodes for a hierarchical linear discriminant analysis classification scheme to predict: (1) if any finger was moving, and, if so, (2) which digit was moving. To account for sensory feedback, we also mapped the spatiotemporal activation elicited by vibrotactile stimulation. Finally, we used this prediction framework to provide immediate online control over individual fingers of the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory modular prosthetic limb. MAIN
RESULTS: The balanced classification accuracy for detection of movements during the online control session was 92% (chance: 50%). At the onset of movement, finger classification was 76% (chance: 20%), and 88% (chance: 25%) if the pinky and ring finger movements were coupled. Balanced accuracy of fully flexing the cued finger was 64%, and 77% had we combined pinky and ring commands. Offline decoding yielded a peak finger decoding accuracy of 96.5% (chance: 20%) when using an optimized selection of electrodes. Offline analysis demonstrated significant finger-specific activations throughout sensorimotor cortex. Activations either prior to movement onset or during sensory feedback led to discriminable finger control. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results demonstrate the ability of ECoG-based BMIs to leverage the native functional anatomy of sensorimotor cortical populations to immediately control individual finger movements in real time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26863276      PMCID: PMC4875758          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/2/026017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  54 in total

1.  The cortical representation of the hand in macaque and human area S-I: high resolution optical imaging.

Authors:  D Shoham; A Grinvald
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Cortical activity during motor execution, motor imagery, and imagery-based online feedback.

Authors:  Kai J Miller; Gerwin Schalk; Eberhard E Fetz; Marcel den Nijs; Jeffrey G Ojemann; Rajesh P N Rao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

4.  Phantom limb imaginary fingertapping causes primary motor cortex activation: an fMRI study.

Authors:  L Ersland; G Rosén; A Lundervold; A I Smievoll; T Tillung; H Sundberg; K Hugdahl
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-12-20       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  BOLD matches neuronal activity at the mm scale: a combined 7T fMRI and ECoG study in human sensorimotor cortex.

Authors:  Jeroen C W Siero; Dora Hermes; Hans Hoogduin; Peter R Luijten; Nick F Ramsey; Natalia Petridou
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Responsive cortical stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy.

Authors:  Felice T Sun; Martha J Morrell; Robert E Wharen
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.620

7.  Simultaneous neural control of simple reaching and grasping with the modular prosthetic limb using intracranial EEG.

Authors:  Matthew S Fifer; Guy Hotson; Brock A Wester; David P McMullen; Yujing Wang; Matthew S Johannes; Kapil D Katyal; John B Helder; Matthew P Para; R Jacob Vogelstein; William S Anderson; Nitish V Thakor; Nathan E Crone
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Cortical adaptation to a chronic micro-electrocorticographic brain computer interface.

Authors:  Adam G Rouse; Jordan J Williams; Jesse J Wheeler; Daniel W Moran
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Electrocorticographically controlled brain-computer interfaces using motor and sensory imagery in patients with temporary subdural electrode implants. Report of four cases.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Felton; J Adam Wilson; Justin C Williams; P Charles Garell
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm.

Authors:  Leigh R Hochberg; Daniel Bacher; Beata Jarosiewicz; Nicolas Y Masse; John D Simeral; Joern Vogel; Sami Haddadin; Jie Liu; Sydney S Cash; Patrick van der Smagt; John P Donoghue
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  47 in total

1.  A low-power band of neuronal spiking activity dominated by local single units improves the performance of brain-machine interfaces.

Authors:  Samuel R Nason; Alex K Vaskov; Matthew S Willsey; Elissa J Welle; Hyochan An; Philip P Vu; Autumn J Bullard; Chrono S Nu; Jonathan C Kao; Krishna V Shenoy; Taekwang Jang; Hun-Seok Kim; David Blaauw; Parag G Patil; Cynthia A Chestek
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 25.671

2.  Decoding Native Cortical Representations for Flexion and Extension at Upper Limb Joints Using Electrocorticography.

Authors:  Tessy M Thomas; Daniel N Candrea; Matthew S Fifer; David P McMullen; William S Anderson; Nitish V Thakor; Nathan E Crone
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  Histological evaluation of a chronically-implanted electrocorticographic electrode grid in a non-human primate.

Authors:  Alan D Degenhart; James Eles; Richard Dum; Jessica L Mischel; Ivan Smalianchuk; Bridget Endler; Robin C Ashmore; Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos; Wei Wang; Aaron P Batista; X Tracy Cui
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 4.  Improving the functionality, robustness, and adaptability of myoelectric control for dexterous motion restoration.

Authors:  Dapeng Yang; Yikun Gu; Nitish V Thakor; Hong Liu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Physiological properties of brain-machine interface input signals.

Authors:  Marc W Slutzky; Robert D Flint
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Neurophysiology and neural engineering: a review.

Authors:  Arthur Prochazka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  The Potential for a Speech Brain-Computer Interface Using Chronic Electrocorticography.

Authors:  Qinwan Rabbani; Griffin Milsap; Nathan E Crone
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.620

8.  Mood variations decoded from multi-site intracranial human brain activity.

Authors:  Omid G Sani; Yuxiao Yang; Morgan B Lee; Heather E Dawes; Edward F Chang; Maryam M Shanechi
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  A modular high-density μECoG system on macaque vlPFC for auditory cognitive decoding.

Authors:  Chia-Han Chiang; Jaejin Lee; Charles Wang; Ashley J Williams; Timothy H Lucas; Yale E Cohen; Jonathan Viventi
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Robust tactile sensory responses in finger area of primate motor cortex relevant to prosthetic control.

Authors:  Karen E Schroeder; Zachary T Irwin; Autumn J Bullard; David E Thompson; J Nicole Bentley; William C Stacey; Parag G Patil; Cynthia A Chestek
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.