Literature DB >> 26863242

Acceptability of a Rinse Screening Test for Diagnosing Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Among Black Americans.

Suzanne C Lechner1,2, Lutécia Pereira2, Erika Reategui2, Claudia Gordon2, Margaret Byrne2,3, Monica Webb Hooper2,4, David J Lee2,3, Marianne Abouyared5, Elizabeth Franzmann6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a debilitating and deadly disease. We evaluated an easy-to-administer and innovative rinse that assays soluble CD44 and total protein as HNSCC early detection markers. We examined whether the rinse was acceptable and whether the results would promote screening behavior. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a prospective observational study.
METHODS: Participants (N = 150) from underserved, low-income Black American backgrounds completed assessments of satisfaction, intention to repeat test, and likely screening behavior after receiving results. Descriptive statistics, t tests, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were conducted.
RESULTS: The rinse was highly acceptable to participants and perceived to be acceptable among peers. Participants strongly agreed that they would perform the rinse as prescribed, engage in preventative behaviors if results indicated risk of cancer, and initiate treatment if they had a positive cancer finding. Employed participants slightly disliked the taste of the rinse but were more likely to schedule a follow-up appointment and engage in preventative behaviors based on the results. Those with health-care coverage (including public health insurance) reported that the test was harder to perform than those who were uninsured.
CONCLUSION: An easy-to-use rinse technique is acceptable and likely to promote screening behavior among Black Americans at risk for HNSCC. Given that many cancer screening modalities are considered unpleasant to undergo, this rinse holds promise for promoting screening behaviors and, thereby, may result in early detection of this potentially fatal disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Black Americans; Cancer screening; HNSCC; Head and neck cancer; Screening rinse

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 26863242     DOI: 10.1007/s40615-014-0048-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities        ISSN: 2196-8837


  26 in total

1.  Improving multiple behaviors for colorectal cancer prevention among african american church members.

Authors:  Marci Kramish Campbell; Aimee James; Marlyn A Hudson; Carol Carr; Ethel Jackson; Veronica Oakes; Seleshi Demissie; David Farrell; Irene Tessaro
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Burden of colonoscopy compared to non-cathartic CT-colonography in a colorectal cancer screening programme: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas R de Wijkerslooth; Margriet C de Haan; Esther M Stoop; Patrick M Bossuyt; Maarten Thomeer; Marie-Louise Essink-Bot; Monique E van Leerdam; Paul Fockens; Ernst J Kuipers; Jaap Stoker; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Factors associated with intention to undergo annual prostate cancer screening among African American men in Philadelphia.

Authors:  R E Myers; T A Wolf; L McKee; G McGrory; D Y Burgh; G Nelson; G A Nelson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Perceptions of barriers and facilitators of cancer early detection among low-income minority women in community health centers.

Authors:  Gbenga Ogedegbe; Andrea N Cassells; Christina M Robinson; Katherine DuHamel; Jonathan N Tobin; Carol H Sox; Allen J Dietrich
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  A nationwide analysis of US racial/ethnic disparities in smoking behaviors, smoking cessation, and cessation-related factors.

Authors:  Dennis R Trinidad; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Martha M White; Sherry L Emery; Karen Messer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Ethnicity and cancer outcomes: behavioral and psychosocial considerations.

Authors:  B E Meyerowitz; J Richardson; S Hudson; B Leedham
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Why do men refuse or attend population-based screening for prostate cancer?

Authors:  H G Nijs; M L Essink-Bot; H J DeKoning; W J Kirkels; F H Schröder
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  2000-09

8.  The importance of health insurance as a determinant of cancer screening: evidence from the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  J Hsia; E Kemper; C Kiefe; J Zapka; S Sofaer; M Pettinger; D Bowen; M Limacher; L Lillington; E Mason
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Colorectal cancer screening in older men and women: qualitative research findings and implications for intervention.

Authors:  C Beeker; J M Kraft; B G Southwell; C M Jorgensen
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2000-06

Review 10.  Fear, anxiety, worry, and breast cancer screening behavior: a critical review.

Authors:  Nathan S Consedine; Carol Magai; Yulia S Krivoshekova; Lynn Ryzewicz; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.