Recently, Christoph Thiel and colleagues from Aachen University published an improved physiologically based pharmacokinetik modeling (PBPK) technique for mouse to human extrapolation (Thiel et al., 2015[18]). This publication will be awarded by the Ebert Prize 2016 of the American Pharmacist Association, which represents the oldest pharmacy award in the United States.The translation of preclinical knowledge often generated in mice to first-in-human studies represents a critical step (Thiel et al., 2015[18]). More than 30 % of developmental compounds fail due to interspecies differences. To improve the situation, the authors used PBPK modeling to predict human plasma concentration-time profiles based on mouse data. The study was based on 10 exemplary drugs for which a comprehensive pharmacokinetic database is available. Mouse to human extrapolation was achieved by adjustment of four model parameter domains (Thiel et al., 2015[18]):species-specific physiology, such as differences in organ size, perfusion, etc.the species-specific non-protein bound fraction of the test compound,kinetic parameters, such as Vmax and KM for the primary route of excretion, andtissue-specific gene expression of the metabolizing key enzymes and transporters.The authors start with a naïve extrapolation where humans are considered as 'large mice' where the same dose per body weight was administered (Thiel et al., 2015[18]). This naïve extrapolation usually resulted in predictions that strongly deviate from the real human situation. Next the authors showed that knowledge-based adjustment of each of the four model domains leads to an improvement and allows predictions which closely resemble the measured situation in humans. A limitation of the current approach is that gene expression data were used to adjust for interspecies differences in metabolism. In future, predictions may become even more accurate if RNA based data could be replaced by metabolic activities.Interspecies differences represent a major problem in toxicology (Dohnal et al., 2014[5]; Bernauer et al., 2000[1]; Brüning et al., 2014[2]; Gerbracht and Spielmann, 1998[9]; Unkila et al., 1995[19]; Leist and Hartung, 2013[15]). Rodent to human comparisons have often been performed by comparing data in human and mouse or rat hepatocytes (Carmo et al., 2004[3], 2005[4]; Reder-Hilz et al., 2004[16]; Hewitt et al., 2007[12]; Gebhardt et al., 2003[8]; Godoy et al., 2013[10]; Hengstler et al., 1999[11]). However, differences in metabolism represent only one of several aspects which can explain interspecies differences.PBPK modeling has been used since long to predict absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (Sterner et al., 2013[17]; Lee et al., 2007[14]; Jonsson et al., 2001[13]; El-Masri et al., 1996[7][6]). However, the approach presented by Thiel and colleagues (2015[18]), in which all parameter domains relevant for interspecies differences can be stepwise adjusted, represents an important step to improve extrapolations from rodent models to predict the human situation.
Authors: Nicola J Hewitt; María José Gómez Lechón; J Brian Houston; David Hallifax; Hayley S Brown; Patrick Maurel; J Gerald Kenna; Lena Gustavsson; Christina Lohmann; Christian Skonberg; Andre Guillouzo; Gregor Tuschl; Albert P Li; Edward LeCluyse; Geny M M Groothuis; Jan G Hengstler Journal: Drug Metab Rev Date: 2007 Impact factor: 4.518
Authors: Christoph Thiel; Sebastian Schneckener; Markus Krauss; Ahmed Ghallab; Ute Hofmann; Tobias Kanacher; Sebastian Zellmer; Rolf Gebhardt; Jan G Hengstler; Lars Kuepfer Journal: J Pharm Sci Date: 2014-11-12 Impact factor: 3.534
Authors: H A el-Masri; R S Thomas; G R Sabados; J K Phillips; A A Constan; S A Benjamin; M E Andersen; H M Mehendale; R S Yang Journal: Arch Toxicol Date: 1996 Impact factor: 5.153
Authors: Teresa R Sterner; Christopher D Ruark; Tammie R Covington; Kyung O Yu; Jeffery M Gearhart Journal: Arch Toxicol Date: 2013-01-13 Impact factor: 5.153
Authors: Helena Carmo; Jan G Hengstler; Douwe de Boer; Michael Ringel; Félix Carvalho; Eduarda Fernandes; Fernando Remião; Lesseps A dos Reys; Franz Oesch; Maria de Lourdes Bastos Journal: Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol Date: 2003-12-16 Impact factor: 3.000
Authors: M Unkila; M Ruotsalainen; R Pohjanvirta; M Viluksela; E MacDonald; J T Tuomisto; K Rozman; J Tuomisto Journal: Arch Toxicol Date: 1995 Impact factor: 5.153
Authors: Patricio Godoy; Nicola J Hewitt; Ute Albrecht; Melvin E Andersen; Nariman Ansari; Sudin Bhattacharya; Johannes Georg Bode; Jennifer Bolleyn; Christoph Borner; Jan Böttger; Albert Braeuning; Robert A Budinsky; Britta Burkhardt; Neil R Cameron; Giovanni Camussi; Chong-Su Cho; Yun-Jaie Choi; J Craig Rowlands; Uta Dahmen; Georg Damm; Olaf Dirsch; María Teresa Donato; Jian Dong; Steven Dooley; Dirk Drasdo; Rowena Eakins; Karine Sá Ferreira; Valentina Fonsato; Joanna Fraczek; Rolf Gebhardt; Andrew Gibson; Matthias Glanemann; Chris E P Goldring; María José Gómez-Lechón; Geny M M Groothuis; Lena Gustavsson; Christelle Guyot; David Hallifax; Seddik Hammad; Adam Hayward; Dieter Häussinger; Claus Hellerbrand; Philip Hewitt; Stefan Hoehme; Hermann-Georg Holzhütter; J Brian Houston; Jens Hrach; Kiyomi Ito; Hartmut Jaeschke; Verena Keitel; Jens M Kelm; B Kevin Park; Claus Kordes; Gerd A Kullak-Ublick; Edward L LeCluyse; Peng Lu; Jennifer Luebke-Wheeler; Anna Lutz; Daniel J Maltman; Madlen Matz-Soja; Patrick McMullen; Irmgard Merfort; Simon Messner; Christoph Meyer; Jessica Mwinyi; Dean J Naisbitt; Andreas K Nussler; Peter Olinga; Francesco Pampaloni; Jingbo Pi; Linda Pluta; Stefan A Przyborski; Anup Ramachandran; Vera Rogiers; Cliff Rowe; Celine Schelcher; Kathrin Schmich; Michael Schwarz; Bijay Singh; Ernst H K Stelzer; Bruno Stieger; Regina Stöber; Yuichi Sugiyama; Ciro Tetta; Wolfgang E Thasler; Tamara Vanhaecke; Mathieu Vinken; Thomas S Weiss; Agata Widera; Courtney G Woods; Jinghai James Xu; Kathy M Yarborough; Jan G Hengstler Journal: Arch Toxicol Date: 2013-08-23 Impact factor: 5.153