| Literature DB >> 25393841 |
Christoph Thiel1, Sebastian Schneckener, Markus Krauss, Ahmed Ghallab, Ute Hofmann, Tobias Kanacher, Sebastian Zellmer, Rolf Gebhardt, Jan G Hengstler, Lars Kuepfer.
Abstract
Transfer of knowledge along the different phases of drug development is a fundamental process in pharmaceutical research. In particular, cross-species extrapolation between different laboratory animals and further on to first-in-human trials is challenging because of the uncertain comparability of physiological processes. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling allows translation of mechanistic knowledge from one species to another by specifically considering physiological and biochemical differences in between. We here evaluated different knowledge-driven approaches for cross-species extrapolation by systematically incorporating specific model parameter domains of a target species into the PBPK model of a reference species. Altogether, 15 knowledge-driven approaches were applied to murine and human PBPK models of 10 exemplary drugs resulting in 300 different extrapolations. Statistical analysis of the quality of the different extrapolations revealed not only species-specific physiology as the key determinant in cross-species extrapolation but also identified a synergistic effect when considering both kinetic rate constants and gene expression profiles of relevant enzymes and transporters. Moreover, we show that considering species-specific physiology, plasma protein binding, enzyme and transport kinetics, as well as tissue-specific gene expression profiles in PBPK modeling increases accuracy of cross-species extrapolations and thus supports first-in-human trials based on prior preclinical knowledge.Entities:
Keywords: Bioinformatics; CYP enzymes; Computational biology; Cross-species extrapolation; First-in-man; Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models; Simulations; Systems pharmacology; Virtual liver; physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25393841 DOI: 10.1002/jps.24214
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pharm Sci ISSN: 0022-3549 Impact factor: 3.534