Literature DB >> 23392142

Complications of transanal endoscopic microsurgery are rare and minor: a single institution's analysis and comparison to existing data.

Anjali S Kumar1, Jasna Coralic, Deirdre C Kelleher, Shafik Sidani, Kirthi Kolli, Lee E Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery, a minimally invasive procedure for treatment of early-stage rectal cancer, carcinoid tumors, and adenomas, is shown to be a safe procedure with very low perioperative morbidity.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the outcomes of transanal endoscopic microsurgery at a large volume tertiary care center with the existing literature.
DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected database of 325 transanal endoscopic microsurgery procedures and looked for risk factors associated with complications. Indications for transanal endoscopic microsurgery included rectal adenocarcinomas, adenomas, and carcinoids.
SETTING: Procedures were performed by a single surgeon at a large-volume tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Patients were enrolled over a 20-year period, and data were collected on demographics, perioperative details, tumor characteristics, and complications.
INTERVENTIONS: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery was performed on all 325 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measures were urinary retention, late bleeding requiring intervention, dehiscence, peritoneal cavity entry, conversion to abdominal approach, fecal soiling, and rectovaginal fistula.
RESULTS: Intraoperative bleeding was associated with larger tumor size, whereas postoperative bleeding requiring intervention was not associated with any factors studied. Peritoneal cavity entry and urinary retention were more likely if the tumor was in either the anterior or lateral position in the rectum. The peritoneal cavity was entered in 9 patients, and conversion to abdominal approach occurred in 1 patient. Intraoperative bleeding, by surgeon's choice, and urinary retention, by patient's choice, were associated with a greater likelihood of admission to the inpatient ward. Fecal soiling was not reported by patients and not recorded. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited because it was a retrospective analysis
CONCLUSIONS: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is an extremely safe procedure, offering very low perioperative morbidity. The overall morbidity found in our study was 10.5%, on par with published data for large series of 21%, 7.7%, and 14.9%. In contrast, complications from radical resection are reported at 18% to 55%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23392142     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827163f7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  21 in total

1.  Transanal endoscopic resection with peritoneal entry: a word of caution.

Authors:  George Molina; Liliana Bordeianou; Paul Shellito; Patricia Sylla
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Transanal endoscopic surgery for complications of prior rectal surgery.

Authors:  Mark G van Vledder; Pascal G Doornebosch; Eelco J R de Graaf
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  [Management of complications in anal and transanal tumor surgery].

Authors:  M Sailer; S Eisoldt; C Möllmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  Should the rectal defect be closed following transanal local excision of rectal tumors? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  B Menahem; A Alves; R Morello; J Lubrano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Risk of complications and long-term functional alterations after local excision of rectal tumors with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM).

Authors:  Angelo Restivo; Luigi Zorcolo; Giuseppe D'Alia; Francesca Cocco; Andrea Cossu; Francesco Scintu; Giuseppe Casula
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Full-thickness excision using transanal endoscopic microsurgery for treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Wei-Jie Chen; Nan Wu; Jiao-Lin Zhou; Guo-Le Lin; Hui-Zhong Qiu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Analysis of local recurrences after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for low risk rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Theodor Junginger; Ursula Goenner; Mirjam Hitzler; Tong T Trinh; Achim Heintz; Wilfried Roth; Maria Blettner; Daniel Wollschlaeger
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Postoperative complications in the treatment of rectal neoplasia by transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a prospective study of risk factors and time course.

Authors:  Carlos Frederico S Marques; Caio Sergio R Nahas; Ulysses Ribeiro; Leonardo A Bustamante; Rodrigo Ambar Pinto; Eduardo Kenzo Mory; Ivan Cecconello; Sergio Carlos Nahas
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery as an outpatient procedure is feasible and safe.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Laliberte; Aude Lebrun; Sebastien Drolet; Philippe Bouchard; Alexandre Bouchard
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Local excision by transanal endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Luis J García-Flórez; Jorge L Otero-Díez
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.