Literature DB >> 26860667

Contrast enhanced pulmonary magnetic resonance angiography for pulmonary embolism: Building a successful program.

Scott K Nagle1, Mark L Schiebler2, Michael D Repplinger3, Christopher J François2, Karl K Vigen2, Rajkumar Yarlagadda4, Thomas M Grist5, Scott B Reeder6.   

Abstract

The performance of contrast enhanced pulmonary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) is an effective non-ionizing alternative to contrast enhanced computed tomography and nuclear medicine ventilation/perfusion scanning. However, the technical success of these exams is very dependent on careful attention to the details of the MRA acquisition protocol and requires reader familiarity with MRI and its artifacts. Most practicing radiologists are very comfortable with the performance and interpretation of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) performed to detect pulmonary embolism but not all are as comfortable with the use of MRA in this setting. The purpose of this review is to provide the general radiologist with the tools necessary to build a successful pulmonary embolism MRA program. This review will cover in detail image acquisition, image interpretation, and some key elements of outreach that help to frame the role of MRA to consulting clinicians and hospital administrators. It is our aim that this resource will help build successful clinical pulmonary embolism MRA programs that are well received by patients and physicians, reduce the burden of medical imaging radiation, and maintain good patient outcomes.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artifacts; Magnetic resonance angiography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pulmonary embolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26860667      PMCID: PMC4751592          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  46 in total

1.  Mortality from pulmonary embolism in the United States: 1962 to 1984.

Authors:  D E Lilienfeld; E Chan; J Ehland; J H Godbold; P J Landrigan; G Marsh
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  No fooling around: direct visualization of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  J W Gurney
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Triage for suspected acute Pulmonary Embolism: Think before opening Pandora's Box.

Authors:  David Levin; Joon Beom Seo; David G Kiely; Hiroto Hatabu; Warren Gefter; Edwin J R van Beek; Mark L Schiebler
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with spiral CT: comparison with pulmonary angiography and scintigraphy.

Authors:  M Remy-Jardin; J Remy; F Deschildre; D Artaud; J P Beregi; C Hossein-Foucher; X Marchandise; A Duhamel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Clinicians' response to radiologists' reports of isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism or inconclusive interpretation of pulmonary embolism using MDCT.

Authors:  Benjamin A Eyer; Lawrence R Goodman; Lacey Washington
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Association between thrombolytic treatment and the prognosis of hemodynamically stable patients with major pulmonary embolism: results of a multicenter registry.

Authors:  S Konstantinides; A Geibel; M Olschewski; F Heinrich; K Grosser; K Rauber; S Iversen; M Redecker; J Kienast; H Just; W Kasper
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-08-05       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study.

Authors:  M D Silverstein; J A Heit; D N Mohr; T M Petterson; W M O'Fallon; L J Melton
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-03-23

8.  The clinical course of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and a negative pulmonary arteriogram.

Authors:  R A Novelline; O H Baltarowich; C A Athanasoulis; A C Waltman; A J Greenfield; K A McKusick
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k-space acquisition order on three-dimensional MR angiography image quality.

Authors:  J H Maki; M R Prince; F J Londy; T L Chenevert
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Acute pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with MR angiography.

Authors:  A Gupta; C K Frazer; J M Ferguson; A B Kumar; S J Davis; M J Fallon; I T Morris; P J Drury; L A Cala
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  16 in total

1.  Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced and unenhanced combined pulmonary artery MRI and magnetic resonance venography techniques in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Furkan Kaya; Furkan Ufuk; Nevzat Karabulut
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Combined MR Imaging for Pulmonary Embolism and Deep Venous Thrombosis by Contrast-enhanced MR Volume Interpolated Body Examination.

Authors:  Qing Fu; Ding-Xi Liu; Xiang-Chuang Kong; Zi-Qiao Lei
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2020-03-13

Review 3.  Cross-sectional imaging of congenital pulmonary artery anomalies.

Authors:  Evan J Zucker
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Contrast-enhanced pulmonary MRA for the primary diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: current state of the art and future directions.

Authors:  Donald G Benson; Mark L Schiebler; Michael D Repplinger; Christopher J François; Thomas M Grist; Scott B Reeder; Scott K Nagle
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism: New Imaging Tools and Modalities.

Authors:  Farbod Nicholas Rahaghi; Jasleen Kaur Minhas; Gustavo A Heresi
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.878

6.  Downstream Imaging Utilization After MR Angiography Versus CT Angiography for the Initial Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  Michael D Repplinger; Rebecca L Bracken; Brian W Patterson; Manish N Shah; Michael S Pulia; John B Harringa; Mark L Schiebler; Scott K Nagle
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Value of MRI in medicine: More than just another test?

Authors:  Edwin J R van Beek; Christiane Kuhl; Yoshimi Anzai; Patricia Desmond; Richard L Ehman; Qiyong Gong; Garry Gold; Vikas Gulani; Margaret Hall-Craggs; Tim Leiner; C C Tschoyoson Lim; James G Pipe; Scott Reeder; Caroline Reinhold; Marion Smits; Daniel K Sodickson; Clare Tempany; H Alberto Vargas; Meiyun Wang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  State-of-the-Art Imaging for the Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  Leonid Roshkovan; Harold Litt
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-08-07

Review 9.  Advances in non-contrast quiescent-interval slice-selective (QISS) magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  R R Edelman; M Carr; I Koktzoglou
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 2.350

10.  Clinical outcomes after magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) versus computed tomographic angiography (CTA) for pulmonary embolism evaluation.

Authors:  Michael D Repplinger; Scott K Nagle; John B Harringa; Aimee T Broman; Christopher R Lindholm; Christopher J François; Thomas M Grist; Scott B Reeder; Mark L Schiebler
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2018-05-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.