| Literature DB >> 26859748 |
Eric Siaw Ntiri1,2, Paul-Andre Calatayud1,3, Johnnie Van Den Berg2, Fritz Schulthess4, Bruno Pierre Le Ru1,3.
Abstract
Competition or facilitation characterises intra- and interspecific interactions within communities of species that utilize the same resources. Temperature is an important factor influencing those interactions and eventual outcomes. The noctuid stemborers, Busseola fusca and Sesamia calamistis and the crambid Chilo partellus attack maize in sub-Saharan Africa. They often occur as a community of interacting species in the same field and plant at all elevations. The influence of temperature on the intra- and interspecific interactions among larvae of these species, was studied using potted maize plants exposed to varying temperatures in a greenhouse and artificial stems kept at different constant temperatures (15°C, 20°C, 25°C and 30°C) in an incubator. The experiments involved single- and multi-species infestation treatments. Survival and relative growth rates of each species were assessed. Both intra- and interspecific competitions were observed among all three species. Interspecific competition was stronger between the noctuids and the crambid than between the two noctuids. Temperature affected both survival and relative growth rates of the three species. Particularly at high temperatures, C. partellus was superior in interspecific interactions shown by higher larval survival and relative growth rates. In contrast, low temperatures favoured survival of B. fusca and S. calamistis but affected the relative growth rates of all three species. Survival and relative growth rates of B. fusca and S. calamistis in interspecific interactions did not differ significantly across temperatures. Temperature increase caused by future climate change is likely to confer an advantage on C. partellus over the noctuids in the utilization of resources (crops).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26859748 PMCID: PMC4747504 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148735
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1PVC surrogate stem for rearing stemborer larvae on artificial diet.
(a) halves of pipe before they are joined, (b) full pipe after halves have been joined.
Fig 2Survival (a) and relative growth rates (b) of Means (± SE) with different letters are significantly different at 5% level according to the GLM for survival and the Student-Newman-Keuls test for relative growth rates.
Fig 3Survival (a) and relative growth rates (b) of Means (± SE) with different letters are significantly different at 5% level according to the GLM for survival and the Student-Newman-Keuls test for relative growth rates.
Fig 4Comparison of survival of . Means (± SE) with different letters are significantly different at 5% level. GLM (binomial).
Results of GLM analysis comparing larval survival of each single-species at different constant temperatures.
| Temperature | O.R. (95% CI) | P-value | O.R. (95% CI) | P-value | O.R. (95% CI) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| 2.9 (1.9–4.6) | <0.001 | 2.7 (1.5–5.0) | 0.002 | 0.8 (0.4–1.6) | 0.51 | |
| 1.5 (1.0–2.2) | 0.04 | 0.8 (0.5–1.4) | 0.49 | 0.3 (0.1–0.5) | <0.001 | |
| 1.0 (0.7–1.4) | 0.93 | 1.6 (0.9–2.8) | 0.1 | 0.1 (0.1–0.3) | <0.001 | |
O.R. = Odd Ratios.
Fig 5Comparison of the relative growth rates (RGR) of . Means (± SE) with different letters are significantly different at 5% level according to the Student-Newman-Keuls test.
Results of ANOVA comparing relative growth rates of each single-species at different constant temperatures.
| Species | F | P-value |
|---|---|---|
| 94.1 | <0.001 | |
| 36.5 | <0.001 | |
| 15.0 | <0.001 |
Results of GLM analysis comparing larval survival between borer species in multi-species communities at different constant temperatures.
| Cp+Bf | Cp+Sc | Bf+Sc | Cp+Bf+Sc (Cp | Cp+Bf+Sc (Bf | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature | O.R. (95% CI) | P-value | O.R. (95% CI) | P-value | O.R. (95% CI) | P-value | O.R. (95% CI) | P-value | O.R. (95% CI) | P-value |
| 3.2 (1.6–6.6) | 0.002 | 0.5 (0.2–0.8) | 0.02 | 0.5 (0.3–0.9) | 0.03 | 1.7 (0.9–3.6) | 0.13 | 0.7 (0.3–1.3) | 0.3 | |
| 16.4 (7.7–37.2) | <0.001 | 0.2 (0.1–0.4) | <0.001 | 0.9 (0.4–1.9) | 0.71 | 10.1 (4.2–26) | <0.001 | 0.9 (0.4–2) | 0.78 | |
| 26.5 (11.8–65.9) | <0.001 | 0.2 (0.1–0.5) | <0.001 | 0.6 (0.3–1.3) | 0.21 | 14.9 (6–43.1) | <0.001 | 2.8 (1.1–8.5) | 0.05 | |
| 7.7 (4.1–14.8) | <0.001 | 0.1 (0.1–0.2) | <0.001 | 1.4 (0.7–2.9) | 0.35 | 13 (5.8–31.7) | <0.001 | 1.2 (0.5–3.2) | 0.66 | |
O.R. = Odd Ratios, Chilo partellus (Cp), Busseola fusca (Bf) and Sesamia calamistis (Sc).
Results of ANOVA comparing relative growth rates between borer species in multi-species communities at different constant temperatures.
| Cp+Bf | Cp+Sc | Bf+Sc | Cp+Bf+Sc | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature | F | P-value | F | P-value | F | P-value | F | P-value |
| 4.1 | 0.04 | 17.3 | <0.001 | 2.4 | 0.13 | 5.1 | 0.009 | |
| 70.2 | <0.001 | 11.0 | 0.002 | 0.3 | 0.61 | 27.4 | <0.001 | |
| 31.6 | <0.001 | 0.1 | 0.74 | 0.01 | 0.94 | 6.0 | 0.004 | |
| 0.2 | 0.67 | 0.3 | 0.62 | 0.04 | 0.84 | 6.4 | 0.003 | |
Chilo partellus (Cp), Busseola fusca (Bf) and Sesamia calamistis (Sc).
Fig 6Comparative survival (a) and RGR (b) between single-species and multi-species communities of . Statistical comparisons were only made between single- and the corresponding multi-species pairings (see Tables 5 and 6).
Results of GLM analysis comparing survival between single-species and multi-species communities under different constant temperatures.
| Temperature | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15°C | 20°C | 25°C | 30°C | |||||
| Treatment comparisons | O.R. (95% CI) | P-value | O.R. (95% CI) | P-value | O.R. (95% CI) | P-value | O.R. (95% CI) | P-value |
| Cp | 1.4 (1.0–2.1) | 0.08 | 5.4 (3.6–8.2) | <0.001 | 3.5 (2.4–5.2) | <0.001 | 2.3 (1.6–3.3) | <0.001 |
| Cp | 0.7 (0.5–1.1) | 0.17 | 0.2 (0.1–0.3) | <0.001 | 0.3 (0.2–0.5) | <0.001 | 0.5 (0.3–0.6) | <0.001 |
| Cp | 1.8 (1.2–2.7) | 0.007 | 5.5 (3.5–8.5) | <0.001 | 5.8 (3.9–8.6) | <0.001 | 3.5 (2.4–5.2) | <0.001 |
| Bf | 1.7 (1.0–2.9) | 0.05 | 6.1 (3.9–9.6) | <0.001 | 2.4 (1.6–3.5) | <0.001 | 4.5 (2.9–7.3) | <0.001 |
| Bf | 0.8 (0.4–1.3) | 0.37 | 0.3 (0.2–0.6) | <0.001 | 0.6 (0.4–1.0) | 0.06 | 0.2 (0.1–0.3) | <0.001 |
| Bf | 2.2 (1.3–3.7) | 0.007 | 6.2 (3.8–10.2) | <0.001 | 3.9 (2.7–5.7) | <0.001 | 7.0 (4.4–11.3) | <0.001 |
| Sc | 2.2 (1.1–4.1) | 0.02 | 1.6 (0.8–3.2) | 0.17 | 0.8 (0.5–1.4) | 0.4 | 0.8 (0.4–1.4) | 0.4 |
| Sc | 2.7 (1.5–5.3) | 0.003 | 2.4 (1.4–4.2) | 0.002 | 1.1 (0.7–1.7) | 0.71 | 0.6 (0.4–1.0) | 0.05 |
| Sc | 3.6 (1.9–6.9) | <0.001 | 3.0 (1.7–5.3) | <0.001 | 2.0 (1.3–3.2) | 0.005 | 1.0 (0.6–1.6) | 0.9 |
O.R. = Odd Ratios, Chilo partellus (Cp), Busseola fusca (Bf) and Sesamia calamistis (Sc).
Results of ANOVA comparing the relative growth rates between single-species and multi-species communities under different constant temperatures.
| Temperature | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15°C | 20°C | 25°C | 30°C | |||||||||
| Treatment comparisons | F | P-value | F | P-value | F | P-value | F | P-value | ||||
| Cp | 3.9 | 0.05 | 35.2 | <0.001 | 10.8 | 0.002 | 0.6 | 0.43 | ||||
| Cp | 2.7 | 0.11 | 8.0 | 0.007 | 3.9 | 0.05 | 0.8 | 0.37 | ||||
| Cp | 0.8 | 0.39 | 35.3 | <0.001 | 14.9 | <0.001 | 20.7 | <0.001 | ||||
| Bf | 0.1 | 0.74 | 30.1 | <0.001 | 7.3 | 0.01 | 39.9 | <0.001 | ||||
| Bf | 0.1 | 0.81 | 11.1 | 0.001 | 0.2 | 0.69 | 29.1 | <0.001 | ||||
| Bf | 0.8 | 0.39 | 30.6 | <0.001 | 10.9 | 0.002 | 59.8 | <0.001 | ||||
| Sc | 0.0 | 0.94 | 1.0 | 0.31 | 4.3 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 0.80 | ||||
| Sc | 2.3 | 0.14 | 7.9 | 0.007 | 11.5 | 0.001 | 0.4 | 0.54 | ||||
| Sc | 3.6 | 0.06 | 0.3 | 0.60 | 19.6 | <0.001 | 6.9 | 0.01 | ||||
Chilo partellus (Cp), Busseola fusca (Bf) and Sesamia calamistis (Sc).