Literature DB >> 23066869

Trait vs. phylogenetic diversity as predictors of competition and community composition in herbivorous marine amphipods.

R J Best1, N C Caulk, J J Stachowicz.   

Abstract

Field studies of community assembly patterns increasingly use phylogenetic relatedness as a surrogate for traits. Recent experiments appear to validate this approach by showing effects of correlated trait and phylogenetic distances on coexistence. However, traits governing resource use in animals are often labile. To test whether feeding trait or phylogenetic diversity can predict competition and production in communities of grazing amphipods, we manipulated both types of diversity independently in mesocosms. We found that increasing the feeding trait diversity of the community increased the number of species coexisting, reduced dominance and changed food availability. In contrast, phylogenetic diversity had no effect, suggesting that whatever additional ecological information it represents was not relevant in this context. Although community phylogenetic structure in the field may result from multiple traits with potential for phylogenetic signal, phylogenetic effects on species interactions in controlled experiments may depend on the lability of fewer key traits.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23066869     DOI: 10.1111/ele.12016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  19 in total

1.  Evolutionary relatedness does not predict competition and co-occurrence in natural or experimental communities of green algae.

Authors:  Markos A Alexandrou; Bradley J Cardinale; John D Hall; Charles F Delwiche; Keith Fritschie; Anita Narwani; Patrick A Venail; Bastian Bentlage; M Sabrina Pankey; Todd H Oakley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The future of evolutionary diversity in reef corals.

Authors:  Danwei Huang; Kaustuv Roy
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Disentangling the effect of body size and phylogenetic distances on zooplankton top-down control of algae.

Authors:  Andros T Gianuca; Jelena H Pantel; Luc De Meester
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Phylogenetic context determines the role of competition in adaptive radiation.

Authors:  Jiaqi Tan; Matthew R Slattery; Xian Yang; Lin Jiang
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Ecosystem functions across trophic levels are linked to functional and phylogenetic diversity.

Authors:  Patrick L Thompson; T Jonathan Davies; Andrew Gonzalez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Assessing insect responses to climate change: What are we testing for? Where should we be heading?

Authors:  Nigel R Andrew; Sarah J Hill; Matthew Binns; Md Habibullah Bahar; Emma V Ridley; Myung-Pyo Jung; Chris Fyfe; Michelle Yates; Mohammad Khusro
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Phylogeny as a proxy for ecology in seagrass amphipods: which traits are most conserved?

Authors:  Rebecca J Best; John J Stachowicz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Historical contingency in species interactions: towards niche-based predictions.

Authors:  Rachel L Vannette; Tadashi Fukami
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 9.492

9.  Relatedness is a poor predictor of negative plant-soil feedbacks.

Authors:  Zia Mehrabi; Sean L Tuck
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 10.323

10.  Morphologically Cryptic Amphipod Species Are "Ecological Clones" at Regional but Not at Local Scale: A Case Study of Four Niphargus Species.

Authors:  Žiga Fišer; Florian Altermatt; Valerija Zakšek; Tea Knapič; Cene Fišer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.