Michael J Johnson1, Lynne S Nemeth, Martina Mueller, Michele J Eliason, Gail W Stuart. 1. Author Affiliations: College of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (Dr Johnson); College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Drs Nemeth, Mueller, and Stuart); and Department of Health Education, San Francisco State University, California (Dr Eliason).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lesbian, bisexual, and queer (LBQ) women, as well as transgender men, are less likely than their heterosexual and female-identifying counterparts to access cervical cancer screening services. Although numerous factors that influence receipt of cervical screening have been identified, several gaps in research and knowledge merit additional research. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to examine cervical cancer screening behaviors of LBQ women and transgender men using American Cancer Society guidelines as the standards for comparison and to determine factors that influence participation in cervical cancer screening. METHODS: A convenience sample of 21- to 65-year-old LBQ women and transgender men was recruited from the Internet and community events. Qualitative data were collected through in-depth telephone interviews and open-ended questions on an online questionnaire. A deductive-inductive content analysis approach was used. RESULTS: The sample was mostly non-Hispanic white women who identified as lesbian. Most were routine cervical cancer screeners. Eighteen factors/themes were identified in the data and were contextualized within a health services theoretical framework. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that although some factors overlap with the general female population, there are other areas that are specific to LBQ women and transgender men. Creating welcoming and inclusive healthcare environments is particularly important to facilitating cervical screening among LBQ women. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Nurse leaders can modify clinical environments, and clinical nurses can be educated to provide safe care for LBQ women and transgender men.
BACKGROUND: Lesbian, bisexual, and queer (LBQ) women, as well as transgender men, are less likely than their heterosexual and female-identifying counterparts to access cervical cancer screening services. Although numerous factors that influence receipt of cervical screening have been identified, several gaps in research and knowledge merit additional research. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to examine cervical cancer screening behaviors of LBQwomen and transgender men using American Cancer Society guidelines as the standards for comparison and to determine factors that influence participation in cervical cancer screening. METHODS: A convenience sample of 21- to 65-year-old LBQwomen and transgender men was recruited from the Internet and community events. Qualitative data were collected through in-depth telephone interviews and open-ended questions on an online questionnaire. A deductive-inductive content analysis approach was used. RESULTS: The sample was mostly non-Hispanic white women who identified as lesbian. Most were routine cervical cancer screeners. Eighteen factors/themes were identified in the data and were contextualized within a health services theoretical framework. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that although some factors overlap with the general female population, there are other areas that are specific to LBQwomen and transgender men. Creating welcoming and inclusive healthcare environments is particularly important to facilitating cervical screening among LBQwomen. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Nurse leaders can modify clinical environments, and clinical nurses can be educated to provide safe care for LBQwomen and transgender men.
Authors: Tara Kiran; Sam Davie; Dhanveer Singh; Sue Hranilovic; Andrew D Pinto; Alex Abramovich; Aisha Lofters Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Madelyne Z Greene; Salimah H Meghani; Marilyn S Sommers; Tonda L Hughes Journal: J Midwifery Womens Health Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Sarah M Peitzmeier; Ida M Bernstein; Michal J McDowell; Dana J Pardee; Madina Agénor; Natalie M Alizaga; Sari L Reisner; Jennifer Potter Journal: Cult Health Sex Date: 2019-10-29
Authors: Madeline B Deutsch; Sari L Reisner; Sarah Peitzmeier; Jennifer Potter; Dana Pardee; Jaclyn M W Hughto Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Marvin E Langston; Lindsay Fuzzell; Marquita W Lewis-Thames; Saira Khan; Justin X Moore Journal: LGBT Health Date: 2019-05-20 Impact factor: 4.151
Authors: Madelyne Z Greene; Tonda L Hughes; Alexandra Hanlon; Liming Huang; Marilyn S Sommers; Salimah H Meghani Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2018-11-12