Daniel L Hertz1, William E Barlow2, Kelley M Kidwell3, Kathy S Albain4, Ted A Vandenberg5, Shaker R Dakhil6, Nagendra R Tirumali7, Robert B Livingston8, Julie Gralow9, Daniel F Hayes10, Gabriel N Hortobagyi11, Rita S Mehta12, James M Rae10. 1. College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 2. SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, WA, USA. 3. University of Michigan, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 4. Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA. 5. London Health Sciences Center/National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical, Trials Group, London, ON, Canada. 6. Wichita NCORP, Wichita, KS, USA. 7. Kaiser Permanente NCORP, Portland, OR, USA. 8. Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. 9. Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 10. Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 11. University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 12. University of California Irvine Medical Center, Chao Family Comprehensive, Cancer Center, Orange, CA, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: In the SWOG S0226 trial the combination of anastrozole plus fulvestrant (n = 349) was superior to anastrozole alone (n = 345) in hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer. Here we report a pharmacokinetic subset analysis investigating a possible drug interaction between anastrozole and fulvestrant. METHODS: Post-menopausal patients with HR-positive metastatic breast cancer were randomized to anastrozole with or without concurrent fulvestrant. Blood samples were collected at 2, 4, 6 and 8 months, just prior to receiving the next dose of anastrozole and fulvestrant. Drug concentrations were measured via LC/MS-MS. Anastrozole concentration was compared in patients on anastrozole alone vs. patients on concomitant fulvestrant. Comparisons were made at each time point using parametric tests and over time using a linear mixed effects model. RESULTS:A total of 483 anastrozole concentration measurements were included, 224 samples from 64 patients on the anastrozole alone arm and 259 from 73 patients on the combination arm. The mean anastrozole concentration in the combination arm was significantly lower than that in the anastrozole alone arm at each sample collection time (all P < 0.01) and in the mixed effects model (an estimated difference of 9.85 ng ml(-1) (95% CI 5.69, 14.00 ng ml(-1) ), P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A significant pharmacokinetic drug interaction was detected, in which the addition of fulvestrant to anastrozole treatment decreased the trough anastrozole concentration. Further research is needed to verify whether this interaction affects treatment efficacy and to determine the pharmacological mechanism by which this interaction occurs.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: In the SWOG S0226 trial the combination of anastrozole plus fulvestrant (n = 349) was superior to anastrozole alone (n = 345) in hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer. Here we report a pharmacokinetic subset analysis investigating a possible drug interaction between anastrozole and fulvestrant. METHODS: Post-menopausal patients with HR-positive metastatic breast cancer were randomized to anastrozole with or without concurrent fulvestrant. Blood samples were collected at 2, 4, 6 and 8 months, just prior to receiving the next dose of anastrozole and fulvestrant. Drug concentrations were measured via LC/MS-MS. Anastrozole concentration was compared in patients on anastrozole alone vs. patients on concomitant fulvestrant. Comparisons were made at each time point using parametric tests and over time using a linear mixed effects model. RESULTS: A total of 483 anastrozole concentration measurements were included, 224 samples from 64 patients on the anastrozole alone arm and 259 from 73 patients on the combination arm. The mean anastrozole concentration in the combination arm was significantly lower than that in the anastrozole alone arm at each sample collection time (all P < 0.01) and in the mixed effects model (an estimated difference of 9.85 ng ml(-1) (95% CI 5.69, 14.00 ng ml(-1) ), P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A significant pharmacokinetic drug interaction was detected, in which the addition of fulvestrant to anastrozole treatment decreased the trough anastrozole concentration. Further research is needed to verify whether this interaction affects treatment efficacy and to determine the pharmacological mechanism by which this interaction occurs.
Authors: Landry K Kamdem; Yong Liu; Vered Stearns; Susan A Kadlubar; Jacqueline Ramirez; Stacie Jeter; Karineh Shahverdi; Bryan A Ward; Evan Ogburn; Mark J Ratain; David A Flockhart; Zeruesenay Desta Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: A Howell; J Cuzick; M Baum; A Buzdar; M Dowsett; J F Forbes; G Hoctin-Boes; J Houghton; G Y Locker; J S Tobias Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Jan 1-7 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Henning Mouridsen; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Aron Goldhirsch; Beat Thürlimann; Robert Paridaens; Ian Smith; Louis Mauriac; John F Forbes; Karen N Price; Meredith M Regan; Richard D Gelber; Alan S Coates Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-08-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A Buzdar; W Jonat; A Howell; S E Jones; C Blomqvist; C L Vogel; W Eiermann; J M Wolter; M Azab; A Webster; P V Plourde Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: James N Ingle; Krishna R Kalari; Aman U Buzdar; Mark E Robson; Matthew P Goetz; Zeruesenay Desta; Poulami Barman; Tanda T Dudenkov; Donald W Northfelt; Edith A Perez; David A Flockhart; Clark V Williard; Liewei Wang; Richard M Weinshilboum Journal: Steroids Date: 2014-08-24 Impact factor: 2.668
Authors: Rita S Mehta; William E Barlow; Kathy S Albain; Ted A Vandenberg; Shaker R Dakhil; Nagendra R Tirumali; Danika L Lew; Daniel F Hayes; Julie R Gralow; Robert B Livingston; Gabriel N Hortobagyi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-08-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Daniel L Hertz; William E Barlow; Kelley M Kidwell; Kathy S Albain; Ted A Vandenberg; Shaker R Dakhil; Nagendra R Tirumali; Robert B Livingston; Julie Gralow; Daniel F Hayes; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Rita S Mehta; James M Rae Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-04-08 Impact factor: 4.335