Joseph S Goveas1, Stephen R Rapp2, Patricia E Hogan3, Ira Driscoll4, Hilary A Tindle5, J Carson Smith6, Shelli R Kesler7, Oleg Zaslavsky8, Rebecca C Rossom9, Judith K Ockene10, Kristine Yaffe11, JoAnn E Manson12, Susan M Resnick13, Mark A Espeland3. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. jgoveas@mcw.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine and. 3. Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. 4. Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee. 5. Division of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 6. Department of Kinesiology, University of Maryland, College Park. 7. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California. 8. Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science and Social Welfare, University of Haifa, Israel. 9. HealthPartners Insitute for Education and Research, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 10. Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester. 11. Department of Psychiatry, Neurology and Epidemiology, University of California, San Francisco. 12. Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 13. Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Independent predictors of preserved cognitive functioning and factors associated with maintaining high preserved cognitive function in women ≥ 80 years remain elusive. METHODS: Two thousand two hundred twenty-eight women with a mean age of 85 years who participated in the Women's Health Initiative Memory Study were classified as cognitively normal (n = 1,905, 85.5%), mild cognitive impairment (n = 88, 3.9%), dementia (n = 121, 5.4%) or other cognitive impairment (n = 114, n = 5.1%) by central adjudication. Global cognitive functioning was assessed using telephone interview for cognitive status-modified in those women who did not meet cognitive impairment criteria. Differences between women grouped by cognitive status with respect to each potential risk factor were assessed using chi-squared tests and t-tests. Backward stepwise logistic regression was used to select factors that were independently associated with cognitive status. RESULTS: Factors associated with preserved cognitive functioning were younger age, higher education, and family incomes, being non-Hispanic white, better emotional wellbeing, fewer depressive symptoms, more insomnia complaints, being free of diabetes, and not carrying the apolipoprotein E-epsilon 4 allele. Cognitively normal women who demonstrated sustained high preserved cognition were younger, more educated, and endorsed better self-reported general health, emotional wellbeing, and higher physical functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing sociodemographic disparities such as income inequality, and targeting interventions to improve depressive symptoms and vascular risk factors, including diabetes, may play an important role in preserving cognition among women who survive to 80 years of age. Person-centered approaches that combine interventions to improve physical, cognitive, and psychosocial functioning may promote maintenance of high preserved cognitive health in the oldest-old.
BACKGROUND: Independent predictors of preserved cognitive functioning and factors associated with maintaining high preserved cognitive function in women ≥ 80 years remain elusive. METHODS: Two thousand two hundred twenty-eight women with a mean age of 85 years who participated in the Women's Health Initiative Memory Study were classified as cognitively normal (n = 1,905, 85.5%), mild cognitive impairment (n = 88, 3.9%), dementia (n = 121, 5.4%) or other cognitive impairment (n = 114, n = 5.1%) by central adjudication. Global cognitive functioning was assessed using telephone interview for cognitive status-modified in those women who did not meet cognitive impairment criteria. Differences between women grouped by cognitive status with respect to each potential risk factor were assessed using chi-squared tests and t-tests. Backward stepwise logistic regression was used to select factors that were independently associated with cognitive status. RESULTS: Factors associated with preserved cognitive functioning were younger age, higher education, and family incomes, being non-Hispanic white, better emotional wellbeing, fewer depressive symptoms, more insomnia complaints, being free of diabetes, and not carrying the apolipoprotein E-epsilon 4 allele. Cognitively normal women who demonstrated sustained high preserved cognition were younger, more educated, and endorsed better self-reported general health, emotional wellbeing, and higher physical functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing sociodemographic disparities such as income inequality, and targeting interventions to improve depressive symptoms and vascular risk factors, including diabetes, may play an important role in preserving cognition among women who survive to 80 years of age. Person-centered approaches that combine interventions to improve physical, cognitive, and psychosocial functioning may promote maintenance of high preserved cognitive health in the oldest-old.
Authors: J C Breitner; B W Wyse; J C Anthony; K A Welsh-Bohmer; D C Steffens; M C Norton; J T Tschanz; B L Plassman; M R Meyer; I Skoog; A Khachaturian Journal: Neurology Date: 1999-07-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Kristine Yaffe; Alison M Laffan; Stephanie Litwack Harrison; Susan Redline; Adam P Spira; Kristine E Ensrud; Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Katie L Stone Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Kristine Yaffe; Laura E Middleton; Li-Yung Lui; Adam P Spira; Katie Stone; Caroline Racine; Kristine E Ensrud; Joel H Kramer Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2011-05
Authors: Jane E Ferrie; Martin J Shipley; Tasnime N Akbaraly; Michael G Marmot; Mika Kivimäki; Archana Singh-Manoux Journal: Sleep Date: 2011-05-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Bryan Howie; Christian Fuchsberger; Matthew Stephens; Jonathan Marchini; Gonçalo R Abecasis Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2012-07-22 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Kathleen M Hayden; Sarah A Gaussoin; Jaimie C Hunter; JoAnn E Manson; Bonnie C Sachs; Aladdin H Shadyab; Hilary A Tindle; Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani; Khyobeni Mozhui; Beverly M Snively; Stephen R Rapp; Susan M Resnick Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Michela Gallagher; Ozioma C Okonkwo; Susan M Resnick; William J Jagust; Tammie L S Benzinger; Peter R Rapp Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Ramon Casanova; Sarah A Gaussoin; Robert Wallace; Laura D Baker; Jiu-Chiuan Chen; JoAnn E Manson; Victor W Henderson; Bonnie C Sachs; Jamie N Justice; Eric A Whitsel; Kathleen M Hayden; Stephen R Rapp Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2021 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Ira Driscoll; Beverly M Snively; Mark A Espeland; Sally A Shumaker; Stephen R Rapp; Joseph S Goveas; Ramon L Casanova; Jean Wactawski-Wende; JoAnn E Manson; Rebecca Rossom; Janet Brooks; Dena G Hernandez; Andrew B Singleton; Susan M Resnick Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Erin L Richard; Donna Kritz-Silverstein; Gail A Laughlin; Teresa T Fung; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Linda K McEvoy Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Achille E Tchalla; Gregory A Wellenius; Farzaneh A Sorond; Margaret Gagnon; Ikechukwu Iloputaife; Thomas G Travison; Thierry Dantoine; Lewis A Lipsitz Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Emily M Briceño; Roshanak Mehdipanah; Xavier Fonz Gonzales; Kenneth M Langa; Deborah A Levine; Nelda M Garcia; Ruth Longoria; Bruno J Giordani; Steven G Heeringa; Lewis B Morgenstern Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2020-04-13 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Khyobeni Mozhui; Beverly M Snively; Stephen R Rapp; Robert B Wallace; Robert W Williams; Karen C Johnson Journal: Front Genet Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 4.599