Emily M Briceño1, Roshanak Mehdipanah2, Xavier Fonz Gonzales3, Kenneth M Langa4, Deborah A Levine4, Nelda M Garcia5, Ruth Longoria5, Bruno J Giordani6, Steven G Heeringa7, Lewis B Morgenstern8. 1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan Medical School. 2. School of Public Health, University of Michigan. 3. Department of Life Sciences, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi. 4. Development Service (HSR&D), Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR), University of Michigan. 5. Department of Neurology, University of Michigan Medical School. 6. Departments of Psychiatry, Neurology, and Psychology and School of Nursing, University of Michigan. 7. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan. 8. Stroke Program, University of Michigan Medical School.
Abstract
Objective: Latinx populations are rapidly growing and aging in the United States. There is a critical need to accurately and efficiently detect those at risk for dementia, particularly those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). MCI diagnosis often relies on neuropsychological assessment, although cultural, demographic, and linguistic characteristics may impact test scores. This study provides a scoping review of neuropsychological studies on MCI in Hispanic/Latinx populations to evaluate how studies report and account for these factors in diagnosis of MCI. Method: Studies were identified using Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus, using search terms (Hispanic* OR Latin* OR "Mexican American*" OR "Puerto Ric*" OR Caribbean) and ("Mild Cognitive Impairment" OR MCI). Studies using neuropsychological tests in diagnosis of MCI for Latinx individuals in the United States were identified. Sample characterization (e.g., country of origin, literacy, language preference and proficiency), neuropsychological testing methods (e.g., test selection and translation, normative data source), and method of MCI diagnosis were reviewed. Results: Forty-four articles met inclusion criteria. There was considerable variability in reporting of demographic, cultural and linguistic factors across studies of MCI in Latinx individuals. For example, only 5% of studies reported nativity status, 52% reported information on language preference and use, and 34% reported the method and/or source of test translation and adaptation. Conclusions: Future studies of diagnosis of MCI in Latinx individuals should report cultural details and use of appropriate neuropsychological assessment tools and normative data. This is important to accurately estimate the prevalence of MCI in Latinx individuals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Objective: Latinx populations are rapidly growing and aging in the United States. There is a critical need to accurately and efficiently detect those at risk for dementia, particularly those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). MCI diagnosis often relies on neuropsychological assessment, although cultural, demographic, and linguistic characteristics may impact test scores. This study provides a scoping review of neuropsychological studies on MCI in Hispanic/Latinx populations to evaluate how studies report and account for these factors in diagnosis of MCI. Method: Studies were identified using Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus, using search terms (Hispanic* OR Latin* OR "Mexican American*" OR "Puerto Ric*" OR Caribbean) and ("Mild Cognitive Impairment" OR MCI). Studies using neuropsychological tests in diagnosis of MCI for Latinx individuals in the United States were identified. Sample characterization (e.g., country of origin, literacy, language preference and proficiency), neuropsychological testing methods (e.g., test selection and translation, normative data source), and method of MCI diagnosis were reviewed. Results: Forty-four articles met inclusion criteria. There was considerable variability in reporting of demographic, cultural and linguistic factors across studies of MCI in Latinx individuals. For example, only 5% of studies reported nativity status, 52% reported information on language preference and use, and 34% reported the method and/or source of test translation and adaptation. Conclusions: Future studies of diagnosis of MCI in Latinx individuals should report cultural details and use of appropriate neuropsychological assessment tools and normative data. This is important to accurately estimate the prevalence of MCI in Latinx individuals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Yian Gu; Adam M Brickman; Yaakov Stern; Christian G Habeck; Qolamreza R Razlighi; José A Luchsinger; Jennifer J Manly; Nicole Schupf; Richard Mayeux; Nikolaos Scarmeas Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-10-21 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Tedd Judd; Darla Capetillo; José Carrión-Baralt; Leonardo M Mármol; Liza San Miguel-Montes; M Gina Navarrete; Antonio E Puente; Heather Rodas Romero; Jacqueline Valdés Journal: Arch Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2009-03-17 Impact factor: 2.813
Authors: Mai T Pham; Andrijana Rajić; Judy D Greig; Jan M Sargeant; Andrew Papadopoulos; Scott A McEwen Journal: Res Synth Methods Date: 2014-07-24 Impact factor: 5.273
Authors: Emily M Briceño; Roshanak Mehdipanah; Xavier F Gonzales; Steven G Heeringa; Deborah A Levine; Kenneth M Langa; Daniel Zahs; Nelda Garcia; Ruth Longoria; Lewis B Morgenstern Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 7.538