Literature DB >> 26858113

Larger voids in mechanically stable, loose packings of 1.3μm frictional, cohesive particles: Their reconstruction, statistical analysis, and impact on separation efficiency.

Arved E Reising1, Justin M Godinho2, Kristof Hormann1, James W Jorgenson3, Ulrich Tallarek4.   

Abstract

Lateral transcolumn heterogeneities and the presence of larger voids in a packing (comparable to the particle size) can limit the preparation of efficient chromatographic columns. Optimizing and understanding the packing process provides keys to better packing structures and column performance. Here, we investigate the slurry-packing process for a set of capillary columns packed with C18-modified, 1.3μm bridged-ethyl hybrid porous silica particles. The slurry concentration used for packing 75μm i.d. fused-silica capillaries was increased gradually from 5 to 50mg/mL. An intermediate concentration (20mg/mL) resulted in the best separation efficiency. Three capillaries from the set representing low, intermediate, and high slurry concentrations were further used for three-dimensional bed reconstruction by confocal laser scanning microscopy and morphological analysis of the bed structure. Previous studies suggest increased slurry concentrations will result in higher column efficiency due to the suppression of transcolumn bed heterogeneities, but only up to a critical concentration. Too concentrated slurries favour the formation of larger packing voids (reaching the size of the average particle diameter). Especially large voids, which can accommodate particles from>90% of the particle size distribution, are responsible for a decrease in column efficiency at high slurry concentrations. Our work illuminates the increasing difficulty of achieving high bed densities with small, frictional, cohesive particles. As particle size decreases interparticle forces become increasingly important and hinder the ease of particle sliding during column packing. While an optimal slurry concentration is identified with respect to bed morphology and separation efficiency under conditions in this work, our results suggest adjustments of this concentration are required with regard to particle size, surface roughness, column dimensions, slurry liquid, and external effects utilized during the packing process (pressure protocol, ultrasound, electric fields).
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bed reconstruction; Interparticle forces; Packing density; Packing process; Slurry concentration; Wall effects

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26858113     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.01.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  5 in total

1.  Liquid chromatography above 20,000 PSI.

Authors:  Matthew J Sorensen; Brady G Anderson; Robert T Kennedy
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 12.296

2.  Bed morphological features associated with an optimal slurry concentration for reproducible preparation of efficient capillary ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography columns.

Authors:  Arved E Reising; Justin M Godinho; James W Jorgenson; Ulrich Tallarek
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 4.759

3.  Implementation of high slurry concentration and sonication to pack high-efficiency, meter-long capillary ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography columns.

Authors:  Justin M Godinho; Arved E Reising; Ulrich Tallarek; James W Jorgenson
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 4.759

Review 4.  Review of the Use of Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry in Clinical Laboratories: Part I-Development.

Authors:  Brian A Rappold
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  The Way to Ultrafast, High-Throughput Enantioseparations of Bioactive Compounds in Liquid and Supercritical Fluid Chromatography.

Authors:  Omar H Ismail; Simona Felletti; Chiara De Luca; Luisa Pasti; Nicola Marchetti; Valentina Costa; Francesco Gasparrini; Alberto Cavazzini; Martina Catani
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 4.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.