Literature DB >> 26857991

Shoulder arthroplasty in Germany: 2005-2012.

Johannes Oppermann1, Erkan Celik2, Jan Bredow2, Frank Beyer3, Michael Hackl2, Christian K Spies4, Lars P Müller2, Klaus J Burkhart5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The field of shoulder endoprothetics has undergone a rapid development in the last years. The purpose of the study was to provide an overview of the development of shoulder arthroplasties in Germany from 2005 until 2012. This study hypothesized that the surgical procedures of the shoulder joint is still increasing and have not reached a plateau until 2012.
METHODS: Data of the German federal statistical office from 2005 until 2012 were analyzed to quantify hemiarthroplasty, anatomic total shoulder and reversed total shoulder arthroplasty rates depending on age, gender and main coded indications. Procedure codes and diagnosis were analyzed for each year. Comparative analyses were used to visualize the difference between the types of shoulder endoprostheses.
RESULTS: A total number of 139.272 shoulder arthroplasties were performed between 2005 and 2012. Total should arthroplasties have increased continuously until 2009. In 2009 more total shoulder arthroplasties have been performed than hemiprothesis implantations, which have culminated in 2008. All in all, women have been treated 3-fold higher than men regarding hemiarthroplasty, total shoulder arthroplasties or reversed total shoulder arthroplasties. Under the age of 60 years the majority of treated patients were male.
CONCLUSION: Since 2005 shoulder arthroplasties are still increasing in Germany, whereas a slight reduction could be detected for shoulder hemiarthroplasty from 2009 up until 2012. Meanwhile total shoulder arthroplasties and reversed total shoulder arthroplasties are still increasing. Women have experienced a 3-fold higher hemiarthroplasty, total shoulder and reversed shoulder arthroplasties than men except for individual younger than 60 years.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; Germany; Reversed shoulder arthroplasty; Shoulder hemiprothesis; Total shoulder arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26857991     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-016-2417-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  10 in total

1.  Is there any influence of humeral component retroversion on range of motion and clinical outcome in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A clinical study.

Authors:  F A de Boer; P M van Kampen; P E Huijsmans
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-12-03

Review 2.  [3D printing in the field of shoulder surgery].

Authors:  Nael Hawi; Nico Bruns; S Razaeian; J D Clausen; Christian Krettek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  A Point-Based Model to Predict Absolute Risk of Revision in Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter Lc Lapner; Meaghan D Rollins; Meltem G Tuna; Caleb Netting; Anan Bader Eddeen; Carl van Walraven
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2019-10-21

4.  Differences in total blood loss and transfusion rate between different indications for shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dominik Malcherczyk; Juliane Hack; Antonio Klasan; Asma Abdelmoula; Thomas J Heyse; Brandon Greene; Bilal F El-Zayat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  The utility of international shoulder joint replacement registries and databases: a comparative analytic review of two hundred and sixty one thousand, four hundred and eighty four cases.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Afanador Bayona; Jeremy S Somerson; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Fretting and Corrosion in Modular Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Retrieval Analysis.

Authors:  Johannes A Eckert; Ulrike Mueller; Sebastian Jaeger; Benjamin Panzram; J Philippe Kretzer
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Use of Patient-Specific Instrumentation (PSI) for glenoid component positioning in shoulder arthroplasty. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guillaume Villatte; Anne-Sophie Muller; Bruno Pereira; Aurélien Mulliez; Peter Reilly; Roger Emery
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Mid-term outcomes of a stemless ceramic head anatomic total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  Maciej J K Simon; Jennifer A Coghlan; Jeff Hughes; Warwick Wright; Richard J Dallalana; Simon N Bell
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Shoulder replacement: an epidemiological nationwide study from 2009 to 2019.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Rocco Papalia; Alessandro Castagna; Sergio De Salvatore; Enrico Guerra; Ilaria Piergentili; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 2.562

10.  International variation in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anne Lübbeke; Jonathan L Rees; Christophe Barea; Christophe Combescure; Andrew J Carr; Alan J Silman
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.717

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.