Randi Melissa Schuster1,2, Robin J Mermelstein3,4, Donald Hedeker5. 1. Center for Addiction Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 4. Institute for Health Research and Policy, Chicago, IL, USA. 5. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The neuropsychological correlates of simultaneous marijuana and tobacco use are largely unknown, which is surprising as both substances have similar neural substrates and have opposing influences on working memory (WM). This study examined the effects of marijuana alone, tobacco alone and simultaneous marijuana and tobacco use on WM. DESIGN: Primary aims were tested using a within-subject design, controlling for multiple subject- and momentary-level confounds via ecological momentary assessment (EMA). SETTING: Data collection occurred in the Chicago, USA area in participants' natural environments. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 287 community young adults from a larger natural history study, oversampled for ever smoking, all of whom event-recorded at least one substance use occasion during the study week. MEASUREMENTS: Momentary tobacco, marijuana and alcohol use were recorded during multiple EMA across 1 week of data capture. WM was assessed at the end of each EMA assessment. Contextual variables that may influence WM were recorded via EMA. FINDINGS: There were main effects for marijuana and tobacco: WM was poorer with marijuana [odds ratio (OR) = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.84-0.99] and better with tobacco (OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.04-1.18). These effects were not qualified by an interaction (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.84-1.26). Alcohol also reduced WM (OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.79-0.95), and the tobacco × alcohol interaction was significant (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.66-0.99), indicating that the facilitative effect of tobacco disappeared with concurrent alcohol use. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to when individuals did not use these substances, working memory decreased with acute marijuana and alcohol use and increased with acute tobacco use. However, the putative effect of marijuana on working memory and the facilitative effect of tobacco on working memory were no longer present when used simultaneously with tobacco and alcohol, respectively. Data suggest that tobacco use may compensate for working memory decrements from marijuana among young adults and highlight the importance of investigating further the negative impact of alcohol use on cognition.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The neuropsychological correlates of simultaneous marijuana and tobacco use are largely unknown, which is surprising as both substances have similar neural substrates and have opposing influences on working memory (WM). This study examined the effects of marijuana alone, tobacco alone and simultaneous marijuana and tobacco use on WM. DESIGN: Primary aims were tested using a within-subject design, controlling for multiple subject- and momentary-level confounds via ecological momentary assessment (EMA). SETTING: Data collection occurred in the Chicago, USA area in participants' natural environments. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 287 community young adults from a larger natural history study, oversampled for ever smoking, all of whom event-recorded at least one substance use occasion during the study week. MEASUREMENTS: Momentary tobacco, marijuana and alcohol use were recorded during multiple EMA across 1 week of data capture. WM was assessed at the end of each EMA assessment. Contextual variables that may influence WM were recorded via EMA. FINDINGS: There were main effects for marijuana and tobacco: WM was poorer with marijuana [odds ratio (OR) = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.84-0.99] and better with tobacco (OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.04-1.18). These effects were not qualified by an interaction (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.84-1.26). Alcohol also reduced WM (OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.79-0.95), and the tobacco × alcohol interaction was significant (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.66-0.99), indicating that the facilitative effect of tobacco disappeared with concurrent alcohol use. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to when individuals did not use these substances, working memory decreased with acute marijuana and alcohol use and increased with acute tobacco use. However, the putative effect of marijuana on working memory and the facilitative effect of tobacco on working memory were no longer present when used simultaneously with tobacco and alcohol, respectively. Data suggest that tobacco use may compensate for working memory decrements from marijuana among young adults and highlight the importance of investigating further the negative impact of alcohol use on cognition.
Authors: Tom A Schweizer; Muriel Vogel-Sprott; James Danckert; Eric A Roy; Amanda Skakum; Carole E Broderick Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Katherine H Karlsgodt; David Shirinyan; Theo G M van Erp; Mark S Cohen; Tyrone D Cannon Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2005-05-01 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Renee D Goodwin; Lauren R Pacek; Jan Copeland; Scott J Moeller; Lisa Dierker; Andrea Weinberger; Misato Gbedemah; Michael J Zvolensky; Melanie M Wall; Deborah S Hasin Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Andrea H Weinberger; Lauren R Pacek; Melanie M Wall; Michael J Zvolensky; Jan Copeland; Sandro Galea; Shadi Nahvi; Scott J Moeller; Deborah S Hasin; Renee D Goodwin Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 4.492