Literature DB >> 26857275

Examining Variation in Hospice Visits by Professional Staff in the Last 2 Days of Life.

Joan M Teno1, Mike Plotzke2, Thomas Christian2, Pedro Gozalo3.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: In the final days of life, symptoms are exacerbated and often families need both education and emotional support from hospice professional staff. The Medicare Hospice Benefit provides a per-diem payment with no requirements on the frequency of patient visits.
OBJECTIVE: To examine individual characteristics, hospice program, and geographic variation in hospice visits by professional staff during the last 2 days of life. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study of 661 557 Medicare hospice beneficiaries included all patients who died in federal fiscal year 2014 (October 1, 2013-September 30, 2014) in hospice services while receiving routine home care in the last 2 days of life. Data analysis was conducted from March 9 to August 25, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Medicare regulations require that hospice care centers report daily the frequency and duration of patient visits by professional staff, as well as the type of hospice staff who conduct these visits. We examined visit variation by hospice professional staff (physician, nursing staff, and social worker) during the last 2 days of life using a multivariable logistic model adjusting for decedent and hospice program characteristics.
RESULTS: Of the 661 557 patients in the study, 81 478 (12.3%) received no professional staff visits in the last 2 days of life. State variation ranged from 590 of 15 399 patients (3.8%) in Wisconsin to 97 of 492 patients (19.7%) in Alaska, and hospice program interquartile variation ranged from 3.2% (25th percentile) to 19.5% (75th percentile). Black patients were less likely to have any visits than were white patients (7352 of 48 221 [15.2%] vs 70 365 of 585 377 [12.0%]; adjusted odds ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.24-1.37). Those dying in a nursing home were 1.74 times less likely to have any visits than those dying at home (30 880 of 186 649 [16.5%] vs 40 973 of 386 654 [10.6%]; 95% CI, 1.62-1.88). Those dying on a Sunday were 3.35 times less likely to have a visit compared with persons dying on a Tuesday (19 519 of 95 979 [20.3%] vs 6784 of 92 127 [7.4%]; 95% CI, 3.17-3.55). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Hospice visits in the last 2 days of life by professional staff vary by race, hospice program, and geographic region of the country. Visits were less likely when the Medicare beneficiary was black, dying on a Sunday, and receiving care in a nursing home.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26857275     DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  11 in total

1.  Nursing Support of Home Hospice Caregivers on the Day of Patient Death.

Authors:  Margaret F Clayton; Jennifer Hulett; Kirandeep Kaur; Maija Reblin; Andrew Wilson; Lee Ellington
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.172

2.  The Affordable Care Act and End-of-Life Care for Patients With Cancer.

Authors:  Ravi B Parikh; Alexi A Wright
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

3.  Racial Disparities in Hospice Outcomes: A Race or Hospice-Level Effect?

Authors:  Jessica Rizzuto; Melissa D Aldridge
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Association between Hospice Spending on Patient Care and Rates of Hospitalization and Medicare Expenditures of Hospice Enrollees.

Authors:  Melissa D Aldridge; Andrew J Epstein; Abraham A Brody; Eric J Lee; R Sean Morrison; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 5.  Linking Quality and Spending to Measure Value for People with Serious Illness.

Authors:  Andrew M Ryan; Phillip E Rodgers
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 6.  A Decade of Studying Drivers of Disparities in End-of-Life Care for Black Americans: Using the NIMHD Framework for Health Disparities Research to Map the Path Ahead.

Authors:  Elizabeth Chuang; Sandra Yu; Annette Georgia; Jessica Nymeyer; Jessica Williams
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 5.576

7.  Hospice Care Experiences Among Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers.

Authors:  Layla Parast; Anagha A Tolpadi; Joan M Teno; Marc N Elliott; Rebecca Anhang Price
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Receipt of Hospice Aide Visits Among Medicare Beneficiaries Receiving Home Hospice Care.

Authors:  Jennifer M Reckrey; Katherine A Ornstein; Karen McKendrick; Emma K Tsui; R Sean Morrison; Melissa Aldridge
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  Opening the black box: Evaluating the care of people with serious illness in Medicare Advantage.

Authors:  Claire K Ankuda; Lauren J Hunt
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 10.  Hospice Use Among Patients with Heart Failure.

Authors:  Sarah H Cross; Arif H Kamal; Donald H Taylor; Haider J Warraich
Journal:  Card Fail Rev       Date:  2019-05-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.