Literature DB >> 26857039

Full 3-dimensional digital workflow for multicomponent dental appliances: A proof of concept.

W Joerd van der Meer, Arjan Vissink, Yijin Ren.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors used a 3-dimensional (3D) printer and a bending robot to produce a multicomponent dental appliance to assess whether 3D digital models of the dentition are applicable for a full digital workflow.
METHODS: The authors scanned a volunteer's dentition with an intraoral scanner (Lava Chairside Oral Scanner C.O.S., 3M). A digital impression was used to design 2 multicomponent orthodontic appliances. Biocompatible acrylic baseplates were produced with the aid of a 3D printer. The metal springs and clasps were produced by a bending robot. The fit of the 2 appliances was assessed by 2 experienced orthodontists.
RESULTS: The authors assessed both orthodontic appliances with the volunteer's dentition and found the fit to be excellent.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians can fully produce a multicomponent dental appliance consisting of both an acrylic baseplate and other parts, such as clasps, springs, or screws, using a digital workflow process without the need for a physical model of the patient's dentition. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Plaster models can be superfluous for orthodontic treatment as digital models can be used in all phases of a full digital workflow in orthodontics. The arduous task of making a multicomponent dental appliance that involves bending wires can possibly be replaced by a computer, design software, a 3D printer, and a bending robot.
Copyright © 2016 American Dental Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Orthodontic appliances; robotics; technology

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26857039     DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2015.11.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8177            Impact factor:   3.634


  5 in total

1.  Effect of Tempol on the prevention of irradiation-induced mucositis in miniature pigs.

Authors:  L Hu; Y Wang; A P Cotrim; Z Zhu; R Gao; C Zheng; C M Goldsmith; L Jin; C Zhang; J B Mitchell; B J Baum; S Wang
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.511

2.  Conventional Vs Digital Impressions: Acceptability, Treatment Comfort and Stress Among Young Orthodontic Patients.

Authors:  Alessandro Mangano; Matteo Beretta; Giuseppe Luongo; Carlo Mangano; Francesco Mangano
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2018-01-31

Review 3.  Cantilevers: Multi-Tool in Orthodontic Treatment.

Authors:  Malgorzata Bilinska; Kasper Dahl Kristensen; Michel Dalstra
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-19

Review 4.  Accuracy of additive manufacturing in stomatology.

Authors:  Yao Tang; Yunfan Zhang; Zhaoqiang Meng; Qiannan Sun; Liying Peng; Lingyun Zhang; Wenhsuan Lu; Wei Liang; Gui Chen; Yan Wei
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-16

Review 5.  Robotic Applications in Orthodontics: Changing the Face of Contemporary Clinical Care.

Authors:  Samar Adel; Abbas Zaher; Nadia El Harouni; Adith Venugopal; Pratik Premjani; Nikhilesh Vaid
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.