| Literature DB >> 26856815 |
H R Frost1,2, S K Tsoi3, C A Baker4, D Laho5, M L Sanderson-Smith6, A C Steer7,8,9, P R Smeesters10,11,12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The practice of counting bacterial colony forming units on agar plates has long been used as a method to estimate the concentration of live bacteria in culture. However, due to the laborious and potentially error prone nature of this measurement technique, an alternative method is desirable. Recent technologic advancements have facilitated the development of automated colony counting systems, which reduce errors introduced during the manual counting process and recording of information. An additional benefit is the significant reduction in time taken to analyse colony counting data. Whilst automated counting procedures have been validated for a number of microorganisms, the process has not been successful for all bacteria due to the requirement for a relatively high contrast between bacterial colonies and growth medium. The purpose of this study was to validate an automated counting system for use with group A Streptococcus (GAS).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26856815 PMCID: PMC4745170 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-016-1875-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
GAS Strains analysed on different media in various assays
|
|
| Mid-log phase HBA | Mid-log phase THY-agar | Growth curve | Bactericidal assay |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A-C3 | + | + | − | − |
| 2 | E4 | + | + | + | + |
| 3 | A-C5 | + | + | − | − |
| 4 | E1 | + | + | + | − |
| 11 | E6 | + | + | − | + |
| 12 | A-C4 | − | − | + | + |
| 17 | Clade Y | + | − | − | − |
| 25 | E3 | − | − | − | + |
| 33 | D4 | + | − | + | − |
| 36 | D1 | + | − | − | − |
| 46 | A-C1 | + | − | − | − |
| 58 | E3 | + | − | − | + |
| 60 | E1 | + | − | − | − |
| 65 | E6 | + | − | − | + |
| 66 | E2 | + | − | − | − |
| 75 | E6 | + | − | − | + |
| 81 | E6 | − | − | − | + |
| 89 | E4 | − | − | − | + |
| 100 | D2 | + | − | − | − |
| 103 | E3 | − | − | − | + |
| 230 | D4 | + | − | − | − |
Fig. 3Growth of mid-log phase GAS on different plating media. Bland–Altman percentage difference of THY-agar, HBA and THY-TTC. The plots compare each replicate of each dilution with the sample from the same culture plated on THY-TTC agar and either HBA (a) or THY-agar (b). The Y axis is based on the formula [100 × (THY-TTC agar–HBA or THY agar)/average of the two points] and the X axis is the average of the two points. The biases of −0.30 and −5.02 are less than the cut-off of ±10 % which show plating on THY-TTC is sufficiently analogous to plating on either of the currently accepted methods. The dotted-lines represent the 95 % limits of agreement and range from −69.09 to 68.48 with HBA and −51.83 to 41.80 with THY agar. c–e show representative images of cultures grown on HBA, THY-TTC and THY-agar respectively. For the comparison with HBA, a series of five dilutions was plated for 16 strains in triplicate, of which 70 counts fell between 10 and 200 colonies. For the comparison with THY-agar, a series of five dilutions was plated for five strains in triplicate, of which 26 counts fell between 10 and 200 colonies
Fig. 1Analysis of the effect of different temperature media when TTC is added. a Analysis of variance of colony counts of an M25 culture serially diluted and plated in triplicate on agar prepared with addition of TTC at a range of temperatures. The average colony count from the 10−3 dilution on plates prepared at each temperature were compared with the average colony count of the same culture plated on HBA. The whiskers represent 95 % confidence intervals around the means. b Example of a plate poured when TTC was added at 35 °C and c at 60 °C and used to plate GAS cultures
Fig. 2Comparison between freshly prepared THY-TTC plates and plates stored at 4 °C for 4 weeks. The analysis compares each replicate of each dilution with the sample from the same culture plated on the 4 week old plates and the fresh plates. The Y axis is based on the formula [100 × (4 week old plates–fresh plates)/average of the two points] and the X axis is the average of the two points. The bias of 5.01 indicates that plates maintain their utility for this period. The dotted-lines represent the 95 % limits of agreement and range from −51.79 to 61.80. For the comparison between the plates, a series of three dilutions were plated for four strains in duplicate, of which 17 counts fell between 10 and 200 colonies. Each point represents one dilution point of each replicate
Fig. 4Effect on plating bacteria in blood. a shows the percentage difference between plating the results of a direct bactericidal assay of 10 GAS strains with three donors. The bias of −4.654 % is less than the cut-off of ±10 %. The analysis compares each replicate of each dilution with the sample from the same culture plated on HBA plates and THY-TTC plates. The Y axis is based on the formula [100 × (HBA THY-TTC plates–THY-TTCHBA plates)/average of the two points] and the X axis is the average of the two points. The bias of −4.65 indicates that the presence of blood on the agar does not significantly alter the ability of GAS to grow on both HBA and THY-TTC plates. The dotted-lines represent the 95 % limits of agreement and range from −63.78 to 54.47. A series of three dilutions was plated for the ten strains for each sample in triplicate, of which 36 counts fell between 10 and 200 colonies. b is an example of cultures plated in blood, the decreased contrast between the colonies and surrounding media does not seem to have a detrimental effect on automated counting
Fig. 5Efficacy of automated counting system over growth cycles. a An exemplar growth curve showing the average concentration of bacteria over the different phases of the growth curve for GAS strain M33 plated on THY-TTC and HBA. At each point the standard error of the means are overlapping. b Comparison of the average bias from Bland–Altman analysis at each time point of growth curves performed for four strains in triplicate. The analysis compares each replicate of each dilution with samples from the same culture plated on HBA plates and THY-TTC plates. The bias is based on the formula [100 × (THY-TTC plates–HBA plates)/average of the two counts] and is averaged for each of the 8 h of growth. As none of the biases fall outside the 10 % cut-off this indicates that plating on THY-TTC is not detrimental at any particular phase of the growth cycle. A series of three dilutions was plated for the four strains for each time point, of which 652 counts fell between 10 and 200 colonies (2 h: 90; 3 h: 104; 4 h: 111; 5 h: 103; 6 h 108; 7 h: 86; 8 h: 50). c The percentage biases and standard deviations