Literature DB >> 26856796

Prostate cancer diagnosis by optical coherence tomography: First results from a needle based optical platform for tissue sampling.

Berrend G Muller1, Daniel M de Bruin2,3, Martin J Brandt3, Willemien van den Bos2, Suzanne van Huystee2, D J Faber3, Dilaria Savci4, Patricia J Zondervan2, Theo M de Reijke2, M Pilar Laguna-Pes2, Ton G van Leeuwen3, Jean J M C H de la Rosette3.   

Abstract

The diagnostic accuracy of Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) based optical attenuation coefficient analysis is assessed for the detection of prostate cancer. Needle-based OCT-measurements were performed on the prostate specimens. Attenuation coefficients were determined by an earlier described in-house developed software package. The mean attenuation coefficients (benign OCT data; malignant OCT data; p-value Mann-Whitney U test) were: (3.56 mm(-1) ; 3.85 mm(-1) ; p < 0.0001) for all patients combined. The area under the ROC curve was 0.64. In order to circumvent the effect of histopathology mismatching, we performed a sub-analysis on only OCT data in which tumor was visible in two subsequent histopathological prostate slices. This analysis could be performed in 3 patients. The mean attenuation coefficients (benign OCT data; malignant OCT data; p-value Mann-Whitney U test) were: (3.23 mm(-1) ; 4.11 mm(-1) ; p < 0.0001) for all patients grouped together. The area under the ROC curve was 0.89. Functional OCT of the prostate has shown to differentiate between cancer and healthy prostate tissue. The optical attenuation coefficient in malignant tissue was significantly higher in malignant tissue compared to benign prostate tissue. Further studies are required to validate these initial results in a larger group of patients with a more tailored histopathology matching protocol.
© 2016 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Imaging; Optical Coherence Tomography; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26856796     DOI: 10.1002/jbio.201500252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biophotonics        ISSN: 1864-063X            Impact factor:   3.207


  10 in total

1.  Novel fiberoptic-based needle redox imager for cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Udayakumar Kanniyappan; He N Xu; Qinggong Tang; Brandon Gaitan; Yi Liu; Lin Z Li; Yu Chen
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2018-02-26

Review 2.  Towards an Optical Biopsy during Visceral Surgical Interventions.

Authors:  David Benjamin Ellebrecht; Sarah Latus; Alexander Schlaefer; Tobias Keck; Nils Gessert
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2020-03-05

3.  Live volumetric (4D) visualization and guidance of in vivo human ophthalmic surgery with intraoperative optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  O M Carrasco-Zevallos; B Keller; C Viehland; L Shen; G Waterman; B Todorich; C Shieh; P Hahn; S Farsiu; A N Kuo; C A Toth; J A Izatt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy and Optical Coherence Tomography for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Needle-Based, In Vivo Feasibility Study Protocol (IDEAL Phase 2A).

Authors:  Abel Swaan; Christophe K Mannaerts; Matthijs Jv Scheltema; Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen; C Dilara Savci-Heijink; Jean Jmch de la Rosette; R Jeroen A van Moorselaar; Ton G van Leeuwen; Theo M de Reijke; Daniel Martijn de Bruin
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2018-05-21

5.  The clinical usefulness of optical coherence tomography during cancer interventions.

Authors:  Labrinus van Manen; Jouke Dijkstra; Claude Boccara; Emilie Benoit; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Michalina J Gora; J Sven D Mieog
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Novel real-time optical imaging modalities for the detection of neoplastic lesions in urology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Oliver Brunckhorst; Qi Jia Ong; Daniel Elson; Erik Mayer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Editorial for: Bertoni et al. ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy: prostatic and periprostatic tissues atlas and evaluation of the learning curve.

Authors:  Till Braunschweig; Ruth Knüchel-Clarke
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Optical coherence tomography holds promise to transform the diagnostic anatomic pathology gross evaluation process.

Authors:  Diana Mojahed; Matthew Applegate; Hua Guo; Bret Taback; Richard Ha; Hanina Hibshoosh; Christine Hendon
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 3.758

9.  A new method using Raman spectroscopy for in vivo targeted brain cancer tissue biopsy.

Authors:  Joannie Desroches; Michael Jermyn; Michael Pinto; Fabien Picot; Marie-Andrée Tremblay; Sami Obaid; Eric Marple; Kirk Urmey; Dominique Trudel; Gilles Soulez; Marie-Christine Guiot; Brian C Wilson; Kevin Petrecca; Frédéric Leblond
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Histopathology: ditch the slides, because digital and 3D are on show.

Authors:  Ilaria Jansen; Marit Lucas; C Dilara Savci-Heijink; Sybren L Meijer; Henk A Marquering; Daniel M de Bruin; Patricia J Zondervan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.226

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.