David Benjamin Ellebrecht1,2, Sarah Latus3, Alexander Schlaefer3, Tobias Keck2, Nils Gessert3. 1. LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Grosshansdorf, Germany. 2. University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Department of Surgery, Lübeck, Germany. 3. Hamburg University of Technology, Institute of Medical Technology, Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cancer will replace cardiovascular diseases as the most frequent cause of death. Therefore, the goals of cancer treatment are prevention strategies and early detection by cancer screening and ideal stage therapy. From an oncological point of view, complete tumor resection is a significant prognostic factor. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and confocal laser microscopy (CLM) are two techniques that have the potential to complement intraoperative frozen section analysis as in vivo and real-time optical biopsies. SUMMARY: In this review we present both procedures and review the progress of evaluation for intraoperative application in visceral surgery. For visceral surgery, there are promising studies evaluating OCT and CLM; however, application during routine visceral surgical interventions is still lacking. KEY MESSAGE: OCT and CLM are not competing but complementary approaches of tissue analysis to intraoperative frozen section analysis. Although intraoperative application of OCT and CLM is at an early stage, they are two promising techniques of intraoperative in vivo and real-time tissue examination. Additionally, deep learning strategies provide a significant supplement for automated tissue detection.
BACKGROUND: Cancer will replace cardiovascular diseases as the most frequent cause of death. Therefore, the goals of cancer treatment are prevention strategies and early detection by cancer screening and ideal stage therapy. From an oncological point of view, complete tumor resection is a significant prognostic factor. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and confocal laser microscopy (CLM) are two techniques that have the potential to complement intraoperative frozen section analysis as in vivo and real-time optical biopsies. SUMMARY: In this review we present both procedures and review the progress of evaluation for intraoperative application in visceral surgery. For visceral surgery, there are promising studies evaluating OCT and CLM; however, application during routine visceral surgical interventions is still lacking. KEY MESSAGE: OCT and CLM are not competing but complementary approaches of tissue analysis to intraoperative frozen section analysis. Although intraoperative application of OCT and CLM is at an early stage, they are two promising techniques of intraoperative in vivo and real-time tissue examination. Additionally, deep learning strategies provide a significant supplement for automated tissue detection.
Authors: Jennifer E Phipps; Taylor Hoyt; Deborah Vela; Tianyi Wang; Joel E Michalek; L Maximilian Buja; Ik-Kyung Jang; Thomas E Milner; Marc D Feldman Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 6.546
Authors: Oleg Nadiarnykh; Valentina Davidoiu; Maximilian G O Gräfe; Machteld Bosscha; Annette C Moll; Johannes F de Boer Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2019-04-03 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Jonathan Lopater; Pierre Colin; Frédéric Beuvon; Mathilde Sibony; Eugénie Dalimier; François Cornud; Nicolas Barry Delongchamps Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: David B Ellebrecht; Maximilian P E Gebhard; Marco Horn; Tobias Keck; Markus Kleemann Journal: Surg Innov Date: 2016-03-13 Impact factor: 2.058
Authors: Júlia Balog; László Sasi-Szabó; James Kinross; Matthew R Lewis; Laura J Muirhead; Kirill Veselkov; Reza Mirnezami; Balázs Dezső; László Damjanovich; Ara Darzi; Jeremy K Nicholson; Zoltán Takáts Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2013-07-17 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Nikolay L Martirosyan; Joseph Georges; Jennifer M Eschbacher; Evgenii Belykh; Alessandro Carotenuto; Robert F Spetzler; Peter Nakaji; Mark C Preul Journal: Clin Neurol Neurosurg Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 1.876
Authors: Abel Swaan; Christophe K Mannaerts; Matthijs Jv Scheltema; Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen; C Dilara Savci-Heijink; Jean Jmch de la Rosette; R Jeroen A van Moorselaar; Ton G van Leeuwen; Theo M de Reijke; Daniel Martijn de Bruin Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2018-05-21
Authors: Arne Westgaard; Svetlana Tafjord; Inger N Farstad; Milada Cvancarova; Tor J Eide; Oystein Mathisen; Ole Petter F Clausen; Ivar P Gladhaug Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2008-01-14 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Jitka Vaculová; Radek Kroupa; Zdeněk Kala; Jiří Dolina; Tomáš Grolich; Jakub Vlažný; David Said; Lydie Izakovičová Hollá; Petra Bořilová Linhartová; Vladimír Procházka; Marek Joukal; Petr Jabandžiev; Ondřej Slabý; Lumír Kunovský Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-07-02