Literature DB >> 26855636

Quality of Life Following ACL Reconstruction: Baseline Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Christine C Johnson1, Grant H Garcia1, Matthew R Garner1, Robert G Marx1.   

Abstract

The study by Dunn et al., "Baseline Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A longitudinal analysis of a multicenter cohort at two and six years," evaluates patient factors that are predictive of outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The current review critically analyzes the findings of this study in light of the current body of literature on the subject and assesses its contribution to the development of evidence-based guidelines. The authors' primary endpoint, the Short Form-36 (SF-36), is used ubiquitously in health care research and allows their results to be compared across different disease states and studies. Despite its widespread use, the SF-36 has been shown to be sensitive to outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The authors' use of generic health-related quality of life outcome as a primary endpoint represents an important contribution to the field, and their findings allow for improved preoperative counseling by identifying baseline patient factors that predict outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Furthermore, by deriving utilities from SF-36 scores, the authors are able to assess the value of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction as compared to other medical and surgical procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON); SF-36; quality of life

Year:  2015        PMID: 26855636      PMCID: PMC4733690          DOI: 10.1007/s11420-015-9473-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  23 in total

1.  No difference in knee function or prevalence of osteoarthritis after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with 4-strand hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon-bone autograft: a randomized study with 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Inger Holm; Britt Elin Oiestad; May Arna Risberg; Arne Kristian Aune
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-01-23       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Clinical outcome at a minimum of five years after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Kurt P Spindler; Todd A Warren; J Claiborne Callison; Michelle Secic; Sheryl B Fleisch; Rick W Wright
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Clinical results and risk factors for reinjury 15 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts.

Authors:  Toby Leys; Lucy Salmon; Alison Waller; James Linklater; Leo Pinczewski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Effects of meniscal and articular surface status on knee stability, function, and symptoms after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a long-term prospective study.

Authors:  W Howard Wu; Thomas Hackett; John C Richmond
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A follow-up report.

Authors:  D B O'Neill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The prognosis and predictors of sports function and activity at minimum 6 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a population cohort study.

Authors:  Kurt P Spindler; Laura J Huston; Rick W Wright; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert G Marx; Annunziato Amendola; Richard D Parker; Jack T Andrish; Emily K Reinke; Frank E Harrell; Warren R Dunn
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Meniscal repair in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a long-term outcome study.

Authors:  J T K Melton; J R Murray; A Karim; H Pandit; F Wandless; N P Thomas
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Increased risk of revision with hamstring tendon grafts compared with patellar tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a study of 12,643 patients from the Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Registry, 2004-2012.

Authors:  Andreas Persson; Knut Fjeldsgaard; Jan-Erik Gjertsen; Asle B Kjellsen; Lars Engebretsen; Randi M Hole; Jonas M Fevang
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  The Swedish National Anterior Cruciate Ligament Register: a report on baseline variables and outcomes of surgery for almost 18,000 patients.

Authors:  Mattias Ahldén; Kristian Samuelsson; Ninni Sernert; Magnus Forssblad; Jón Karlsson; Jüri Kartus
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Lower risk of revision with patellar tendon autografts compared with hamstring autografts: a registry study based on 45,998 primary ACL reconstructions in Scandinavia.

Authors:  Tone Gifstad; Olav A Foss; Lars Engebretsen; Martin Lind; Magnus Forssblad; Grethe Albrektsen; Jon Olav Drogset
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  2 in total

1.  Outside-In vs. Anteromedial Portal Drilling During Primary ACL Reconstruction: Comparison at Two Years.

Authors:  Tyler CarlLee; Zach Ries; Kyle Duchman; Yubo Gao; Brian Wolf; Annunziato Amendola; Carolyn Hettrich; Matthew Bollier
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017

2.  Can a Knee Brace Prevent ACL Reinjury: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Bianca Marois; Xue Wei Tan; Thierry Pauyo; Philippe Dodin; Laurent Ballaz; Marie-Lyne Nault
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.