Literature DB >> 26855394

Short-term Outcome of Robot-assisted and Open IPAA: An Observational Single-center Study.

Anders Mark-Christensen1, Frederik Rønne Pachler, Charlotte Buchard Nørager, Peter Jepsen, Søren Laurberg, Anders Tøttrup.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The potential advantages of robot-assisted laparoscopy are being increasingly investigated, although data on its efficacy in benign colorectal surgery are scarce.
OBJECTIVE: We compared the early postoperative outcome in robot-assisted IPAA with open surgery procedures.
DESIGN: This was an observational study based on prospectively collected data obtained from chart reviews.
SETTING: The single-center data set covers patients operated on from January 13, 2004, to September 16, 2014, at a specialist center. PATIENTS: Patients with ulcerative colitis undergoing IPAA surgery were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Study end points included the duration of operation, admission length, complications (Clavien-Dindo), reoperations, and readmissions.
RESULTS: Eighty-one robot-assisted and 170 open IPAA procedures were performed. The duration of operation was significantly longer for robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures (mean difference, 154 minutes; CI, 140-170). During a mean follow-up of 102 days, no significant differences in the distribution of complications were found (Spearman p = 0.12; p = 0.07), and no postoperative deaths occurred in either group. Postoperative admission length was shorter following robot-assisted procedures (mean difference, -1.9; CI, -3.5 to -0.3), whereas 40% of patients were readmitted, compared with 26% of patients who had open surgery (OR, 1.9; CI, 1.1-3.4). Pouch failure occurred in 3 patients (1 following robot-assisted laparoscopy; 2 following open surgery). On multivariate regression analyses, robot-assisted laparoscopy was associated with a significantly longer duration of operation (mean difference, 159 minutes; CI, 144-174), and more readmissions for any cause (OR, 2; CI, 1.1-3.7). LIMITATIONS: This was a nonrandomized, single-center observational study.
CONCLUSION: In this implementation phase, robot-assisted IPAA surgery offers acceptable short-term outcomes. The limitations of this observational study call for randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up and exploration of functional results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26855394     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  9 in total

1.  Primary fecal diversion and bowel dysfunction in restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a nationwide cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Anders Mark-Christensen; Søren Brandsborg; Søren Laurberg
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  The Current Role of Robotics in Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Harith H Mushtaq; Shinil K Shah; Amit K Agarwal
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2019-03-06

Review 3.  Robotic versus laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julie Flynn; Jose T Larach; Joseph C H Kong; Satish K Warrier; Alexander Heriot
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Robotic Surgery in Crohn's Disease.

Authors:  Drew Gunnells; Jamie Cannon
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-09-08

5.  Equivalency of short-term perioperative outcomes after open, laparoscopic, and robotic ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Does procedure complexity override operative approach?

Authors:  Dorcas Opoku; Alexander Hart; Dakota T Thompson; Catherine G Tran; Mohammed O Suraju; Jeremy Chang; Sonja Boatman; Alexander Troester; Paolo Goffredo; Imran Hassan
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-20

Review 6.  Robotic Surgery for Ulcerative Colitis.

Authors:  Marissa Anderson; Alexis Grucela
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2022-01-17

Review 7.  Robotic multiquadrant colorectal procedures: A single-center experience and a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Giorgio Bianchi; Paschalis Gavriilidis; Aleix Martínez-Pérez; Gian Luigi de'Angelis; Mathieu Uzzan; Iradj Sobhani; Federico Coccolini; Carlo Alberto Schena; Maria Clotilde Carra; Giuseppe Spinoglio; Nicola de'Angelis
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-08-17

Review 8.  Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of robotic colorectal resections for inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  S Renshaw; I L Silva; A Hotouras; S D Wexner; J Murphy; C Bhan
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 9.  Ileal-anal pouches: A review of its history, indications, and complications.

Authors:  Kheng-Seong Ng; Simon Joseph Gonsalves; Peter Michael Sagar
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.