Literature DB >> 26855111

Use of Cefazolin for Group B Streptococci Prophylaxis in Women Reporting a Penicillin Allergy Without Anaphylaxis.

Victoria A Briody1, Catherine M Albright, Phinnara Has, Brenna L Hughes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the proportion of group B streptococci (GBS)-colonized women with a reported penicillin allergy without anaphylaxis receiving appropriate intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of GBS-colonized, penicillin-allergic women delivering at term receiving intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis during labor. Scheduled cesarean deliveries were excluded. The primary outcome was the proportion of women who received appropriate antibiotic coverage, defined as penicillin or cefazolin. Secondary outcomes included neonatal outcomes such as Apgar score, blood draws, antibiotic use, length of hospital stay, and composite morbidity.
RESULTS: Of 165 women reporting a penicillin allergy without anaphylaxis, 73 (44.2%) received an appropriate antibiotic and 92 (55.8%) received an inappropriate antibiotic. Of those receiving an inappropriate antibiotic, 56 (60.9%) were given clindamycin, 1 (1.1%) erythromycin, and 35 (38.0%) vancomycin. Women reporting rash as a penicillin reaction were more likely to receive cefazolin than another antibiotic (44 [60.3%] compared with 24 [26.1%], respectively; P<.001), whereas women whose reaction was not documented were less likely to receive cefazolin (18 [24.7%] compared with 63 [68.5%], respectively; P<.001). Among neonates whose mothers received appropriate compared with inappropriate antibiotics, there were no differences in Apgar score, number of blood draws, antibiotic use, length of hospital stay, or composite morbidity.
CONCLUSION: More than half of women allergic to penicillin without anaphylaxis received an antibiotic other than penicillin or cefazolin as prophylaxis, indicating poor adherence to national guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26855111     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

1.  Morbidity in Pregnant Women Associated with Unverified Penicillin Allergies, Antibiotic Use, and Group B Streptococcus Infections.

Authors:  Shilpa H Desai; Michael S Kaplan; Qiaoling Chen; Eric M Macy
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2017-01-06

Review 2.  The challenge of de-labeling penicillin allergy.

Authors:  Cosby A Stone; Jason Trubiano; David T Coleman; Christine R F Rukasin; Elizabeth J Phillips
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2019-05-26       Impact factor: 13.146

3.  Appropriate Antibiotic Use for Group B Streptococcus Prophylaxis Among Penicillin-Allergic Patients in Academic and Nonacademic Hospitals.

Authors:  Beth L Pineles; Katherine E Goodman; Lisa Pineles; Anthony D Harris
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.423

Review 4.  Adverse events in women and children who have received intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis treatment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Farah Seedat; Chris Stinton; Jacoby Patterson; Julia Geppert; Bee Tan; Esther R Robinson; Noel Denis McCarthy; Olalekan A Uthman; Karoline Freeman; Samantha Ann Johnson; Hannah Fraser; Colin Stewart Brown; Aileen Clarke; Sian Taylor-Phillips
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Time Has Come for Routine Penicillin Allergy Testing in Obstetrics.

Authors:  Elizabeth Cook; Mildred Ramirez; Mark Turrentine
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2020-02-04

6.  Penicillin Allergy Assessment in Pregnancy: Safety and Impact on Antibiotic Use.

Authors:  Anna R Wolfson; Christian M Mancini; Aleena Banerji; Xiaoqing Fu; Allison S Bryant; Neelam A Phadke; Erica S Shenoy; Weaam Arman; Yuqing Zhang; Kimberly G Blumenthal
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2020-11-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.