Literature DB >> 26854892

Legacy effects of grassland management on soil carbon to depth.

Susan E Ward1, Simon M Smart2, Helen Quirk1, Jerry R B Tallowin3, Simon R Mortimer4, Robert S Shiel5, Andrew Wilby1, Richard D Bardgett6.   

Abstract

The importance of managing land to optimize carbon sequestration for climate change mitigation is widely recognized, with grasslands being identified as having the potential to sequester additional carbon. However, most soil carbon inventories only consider surface soils, and most large-scale surveys group ecosystems into broad habitats without considering management intensity. Consequently, little is known about the quantity of deep soil carbon and its sensitivity to management. From a nationwide survey of grassland soils to 1 m depth, we show that carbon in grassland soils is vulnerable to management and that these management effects can be detected to considerable depth down the soil profile, albeit at decreasing significance with depth. Carbon concentrations in soil decreased as management intensity increased, but greatest soil carbon stocks (accounting for bulk density differences), were at intermediate levels of management. Our study also highlights the considerable amounts of carbon in subsurface soil below 30 cm, which is missed by standard carbon inventories. We estimate grassland soil carbon in Great Britain to be 2097 Tg C to a depth of 1 m, with ~60% of this carbon being below 30 cm. Total stocks of soil carbon (t ha(-1) ) to 1 m depth were 10.7% greater at intermediate relative to intensive management, which equates to 10.1 t ha(-1) in surface soils (0-30 cm), and 13.7 t ha(-1) in soils from 30 to 100 cm depth. Our findings highlight the existence of substantial carbon stocks at depth in grassland soils that are sensitive to management. This is of high relevance globally, given the extent of land cover and large stocks of carbon held in temperate managed grasslands. Our findings have implications for the future management of grasslands for carbon storage and climate mitigation, and for global carbon models which do not currently account for changes in soil carbon to depth with management.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbon inventory; grassland; legacy effect; management intensity; soil carbon; soil carbon stocks; soil depth

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26854892     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  4 in total

1.  A heteroskedastic model of Park Grass spring hay yields in response to weather suggests continuing yield decline with climate change in future decades.

Authors:  John W G Addy; Richard H Ellis; Chloe MacLaren; Andy J Macdonald; Mikhail A Semenov; Andrew Mead
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 4.293

2.  Warming deferentially altered multidimensional soil legacy induced by past land use history.

Authors:  Weiling Dong; Alin Song; Xueduan Liu; Bing Yu; Boren Wang; Yuqiu Lu; Yanling Li; Huaqun Yin; Jianwei Li; Fenliang Fan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Restoration of degraded grasslands, but not invasion by Prosopis juliflora, avoids trade-offs between climate change mitigation and other ecosystem services.

Authors:  Purity Rima Mbaabu; Daniel Olago; Maina Gichaba; Sandra Eckert; René Eschen; Silas Oriaso; Simon Kosgei Choge; Theo Edmund Werner Linders; Urs Schaffner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The main driver of soil organic carbon differs greatly between topsoil and subsoil in a grazing steppe.

Authors:  Yantao Wu; Zhiwei Guo; Zhiyong Li; Maowei Liang; Yongkang Tang; Jinghui Zhang; Bailing Miao; Lixin Wang; Cuizhu Liang
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.167

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.