Danilo Arnone1, Dominic Job2, Sudhakar Selvaraj3, Osamu Abe4, Francesco Amico5, Yuqi Cheng6, Sean J Colloby7, John T O'Brien7, Thomas Frodl5,8, Ian H Gotlib9, Byung-Joo Ham10, M Justin Kim11, P Cédric M P Koolschijn12, Cintia A-M Périco13, Giacomo Salvadore14, Alan J Thomas7, Marie-José Van Tol15, Nic J A van der Wee16, Dick J Veltman17, Gerd Wagner18, Andrew M McIntosh19. 1. Centre for Affective Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. 2. Neuroimaging Sciences, the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas. 4. Department of Radiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, Japan. 5. Trinity College School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Neuroimaging Group, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland. 6. Department of Psychiatry, the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, People's Republic of China. 7. Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. 8. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany. 9. Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California. 10. Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 11. Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire. 12. Dutch Autism & ADHD Research Center Brain and Cognition, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 13. Disciplinas De Psiquiatria E Psicologia Médica Da Faculdade De Medicina Do ABC Coordenadora Da Enfermaria De Psiquiatria Do Hospital Estadual Mário Covas, San Paolo, Brazil. 14. Neuroscience Experimental Medicine, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, New Jersey. 15. Neuroimaging Centre, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. 16. Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition/Psychiatric Neuroimaging, Leiden University and Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. 17. Department of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 18. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany. 19. Division of Psychiatry, the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Several neuroimaging meta-analyses have summarized structural brain changes in major depression using coordinate-based methods. These methods might be biased toward brain regions where significant differences were found in the original studies. In this study, a novel voxel-based technique is implemented that estimates and meta-analyses between-group differences in grey matter from individual MRI studies, which are then applied to the study of major depression. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometry studies were conducted comparing participants with major depression and healthy controls by using statistical parametric maps. Summary effect sizes were computed correcting for multiple comparisons at the voxel level. Publication bias and heterogeneity were also estimated and the excess of heterogeneity was investigated with metaregression analyses. RESULTS: Patients with major depression were characterized by diffuse bilateral grey matter loss in ventrolateral and ventromedial frontal systems extending into temporal gyri compared to healthy controls. Grey matter reduction was also detected in the right parahippocampal and fusiform gyri, hippocampus, and bilateral thalamus. Other areas included parietal lobes and cerebellum. There was no evidence of statistically significant publication bias or heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: The novel computational meta-analytic approach used in this study identified extensive grey matter loss in key brain regions implicated in emotion generation and regulation. Results are not biased toward the findings of the original studies because they include all available imaging data, irrespective of statistically significant regions, resulting in enhanced detection of additional areas of grey matter loss.
OBJECTIVE: Several neuroimaging meta-analyses have summarized structural brain changes in major depression using coordinate-based methods. These methods might be biased toward brain regions where significant differences were found in the original studies. In this study, a novel voxel-based technique is implemented that estimates and meta-analyses between-group differences in grey matter from individual MRI studies, which are then applied to the study of major depression. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometry studies were conducted comparing participants with major depression and healthy controls by using statistical parametric maps. Summary effect sizes were computed correcting for multiple comparisons at the voxel level. Publication bias and heterogeneity were also estimated and the excess of heterogeneity was investigated with metaregression analyses. RESULTS: Patients with major depression were characterized by diffuse bilateral grey matter loss in ventrolateral and ventromedial frontal systems extending into temporal gyri compared to healthy controls. Grey matter reduction was also detected in the right parahippocampal and fusiform gyri, hippocampus, and bilateral thalamus. Other areas included parietal lobes and cerebellum. There was no evidence of statistically significant publication bias or heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: The novel computational meta-analytic approach used in this study identified extensive grey matter loss in key brain regions implicated in emotion generation and regulation. Results are not biased toward the findings of the original studies because they include all available imaging data, irrespective of statistically significant regions, resulting in enhanced detection of additional areas of grey matter loss.
Authors: Sudhakar Selvaraj; Danilo Arnone; Dominic Job; Andrew Stanfield; Tom Fd Farrow; Allison C Nugent; Harald Scherk; Oliver Gruber; Xiaohua Chen; Perminder S Sachdev; Daniel P Dickstein; Gin S Malhi; Tae H Ha; Kyooseob Ha; Mary L Phillips; Andrew M McIntosh Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Amanda K Y Mak; Michael M C Wong; Shi-Hui Han; Tatia M C Lee Journal: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry Date: 2009-07-19 Impact factor: 5.067
Authors: P Cédric M P Koolschijn; Neeltje E M van Haren; Gerty J L M Lensvelt-Mulders; Hilleke E Hulshoff Pol; René S Kahn Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Callie L McGrath; Mary E Kelley; Paul E Holtzheimer; Boadie W Dunlop; W Edward Craighead; Alexandre R Franco; R Cameron Craddock; Helen S Mayberg Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Cynthia H Y Fu; Steve C R Williams; Michael J Brammer; John Suckling; Jieun Kim; Anthony J Cleare; Nicholas D Walsh; Martina T Mitterschiffthaler; Chris M Andrew; Emilio Merlo Pich; Edward T Bullmore Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Geoffroy Laumet; Wenjun Zhou; Robert Dantzer; Jules D Edralin; XiaoJiao Huo; David P Budac; Jason C O'Connor; Anna W Lee; Cobi J Heijnen; Annemieke Kavelaars Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2017-07-11 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Taolin Chen; Keith M Kendrick; Jinhui Wang; Min Wu; Kaiming Li; Xiaoqi Huang; Yuejia Luo; Su Lui; John A Sweeney; Qiyong Gong Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-02-08 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Rachel Upthegrove; Paris Lalousis; Pavan Mallikarjun; Katharine Chisholm; Sian Lowri Griffiths; Mariam Iqbal; Mirabel Pelton; Renate Reniers; Alexandra Stainton; Marlene Rosen; Anne Ruef; Dominic B Dwyer; Marian Surman; Theresa Haidl; Nora Penzel; Lana Kambeitz-Llankovic; Alessandro Bertolino; Paolo Brambilla; Stefan Borgwardt; Joseph Kambeitz; Rebekka Lencer; Christos Pantelis; Stephan Ruhrmann; Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Raimo K R Salokangas; Eva Meisenzahl; Stephen J Wood; Nikolaos Koutsouleris Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2021-01-23 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Thomas Frodl; Deborah Janowitz; Lianne Schmaal; Leonardo Tozzi; Henrik Dobrowolny; Dan J Stein; Dick J Veltman; Katharina Wittfeld; Theo G M van Erp; Neda Jahanshad; Andrea Block; Katrin Hegenscheid; Henry Völzke; Jim Lagopoulos; Sean N Hatton; Ian B Hickie; Eva Maria Frey; Angela Carballedo; Samantha J Brooks; Daniella Vuletic; Anne Uhlmann; Ilya M Veer; Henrik Walter; Knut Schnell; Dominik Grotegerd; Volker Arolt; Harald Kugel; Elisabeth Schramm; Carsten Konrad; Bartosz Zurowski; Bernhard T Baune; Nic J A van der Wee; Marie-Jose van Tol; Brenda W J H Penninx; Paul M Thompson; Derrek P Hibar; Udo Dannlowski; Hans J Grabe Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2016-11-19 Impact factor: 4.791